Yang Su-Yin, McCracken Lance M, Moss-Morris Rona
Health Psychology Section, Psychology Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, 5th Floor Bermondsey Wing, Guy's Campus, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
Pain Management Clinic, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, 11 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, Singapore, 308433, Singapore.
Int J Behav Med. 2016 Aug;23(4):473-84. doi: 10.1007/s12529-015-9481-3.
Psychological treatments are recognised as generally effective for chronic pain. However, little is known about the evidence for psychological treatments for chronic pain in Asia.
This study aimed (1) to identify all treatment outcome studies in the area of psychological approaches to chronic pain in adult populations of East Asia and Southeast Asia and (2) to evaluate the treatment types, the evidence for treatment outcomes and research design quality with regard to these studies.
We identified all psychologically based treatment outcome studies for chronic pain in East and Southeast Asia by searching CENTRAL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, MEDLINE (via Ovid), Global Health and Web of Science from the beginning of each abstracting service until December 2014 (week 4).
Seventeen studies met inclusion criteria including a total of N = 1,890 participants. Four were randomised controlled trials (RCTs), five controlled clinical trials (CCTs) and eight cohort studies. Treatment outcomes included pain, disability, depression and anxiety. Overall, the studies included in this review showed small to medium within-group effect sizes for all four outcomes. A majority of the studies were rated as weak in design quality. Three RCTs were found to be of strong quality, one of moderate quality and only one CCT of moderate quality.
The current available literature on psychological treatments for chronic pain in East and Southeast Asia is generally small in scale, mostly preliminary and lags behind on some developments occurring in North America and Europe. Further development of treatment methods and research designs is warranted.
心理治疗被认为对慢性疼痛总体有效。然而,对于亚洲慢性疼痛心理治疗的证据了解甚少。
本研究旨在(1)识别东亚和东南亚成年人群慢性疼痛心理治疗领域的所有治疗结果研究,以及(2)评估这些研究的治疗类型、治疗结果证据和研究设计质量。
我们通过检索Cochrane系统评价数据库(CENTRAL)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(EMBASE)、心理学文摘数据库(PsycINFO)、医学期刊数据库(MEDLINE,通过Ovid平台)、全球健康数据库和科学引文索引数据库(Web of Science),从各数据库开始收录摘要起至2014年12月第4周,识别东亚和东南亚所有基于心理治疗的慢性疼痛治疗结果研究。
17项研究符合纳入标准,共纳入1890名参与者。其中4项为随机对照试验(RCT),5项为对照临床试验(CCT),8项为队列研究。治疗结果包括疼痛、残疾、抑郁和焦虑。总体而言,本综述纳入的研究显示,所有这四项结果的组内效应量均为小到中等。大多数研究的设计质量被评为较弱。发现3项RCT质量较高,1项中等质量,只有1项CCT为中等质量。
目前关于东亚和东南亚慢性疼痛心理治疗的现有文献规模普遍较小,大多为初步研究,且落后于北美和欧洲的一些发展。治疗方法和研究设计的进一步发展是必要的。