• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

话轮转换与修补的交叉:会话中他人修补启动的时机。

The intersection of turn-taking and repair: the timing of other-initiations of repair in conversation.

机构信息

Language and Cognition Department, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen Netherlands.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2015 Mar 12;6:250. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00250. eCollection 2015.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00250
PMID:25814968
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4357221/
Abstract

The transitions between turns at talk in conversation tend to occur quickly, with only a slight gap of ∼100-300 ms between them. This estimate of central tendency, however, hides a wealth of complex variation, as a number of factors, such as the type of turns involved, have been shown to influence the timing of turn transitions. This article considers one specific type of turn that does not conform to the statistical trend, namely turns that deal with troubles of speaking, hearing, and understanding, known as other-initiations of repair (OIR). The results of a quantitative analysis of 169 OIRs in face-to-face conversation reveal that the most frequent cases occur after gaps of ∼700 ms. Furthermore, OIRs that locate a source of trouble in a prior turn specifically tend to occur after shorter gaps than those that do not, and those that correct errors in a prior turn, while rare, tend to occur without delay. An analysis of the transitions before OIRs, using methods of conversation analysis, suggests that speakers use the extra time (i) to search for a late recognition of the problematic turn, (ii) to provide an opportunity for the speaker of the problematic turn to resolve the trouble independently, and (iii) to produce visual signals, such as facial gestures. In light of these results, it is argued that OIRs take priority over other turns at talk in conversation and therefore are not subject to the same rules and constraints that motivate fast turn transitions in general.

摘要

在会话中,谈话之间的转换往往很快,它们之间只有大约 100-300 毫秒的微小间隙。然而,这种集中趋势的估计掩盖了大量复杂的变化,因为一些因素,如涉及的轮次类型,已经被证明会影响轮次转换的时间。本文考虑了一种不符合统计趋势的特定类型的轮次,即处理说话、听力和理解困难的轮次,称为其他启动的修复(OIR)。对面对面会话中 169 个 OIR 的定量分析结果表明,最常见的情况发生在大约 700 毫秒的间隙之后。此外,在先行轮次中明确定位问题源的 OIR 比不明确定位问题源的 OIR 更倾向于发生在较短的间隙之后,而在先行轮次中纠正错误的 OIR 虽然很少见,但往往会立即发生。对 OIR 之前的过渡进行的会话分析方法分析表明,说话者利用额外的时间:(i) 寻找对有问题的轮次的后期识别;(ii) 为有问题的轮次的说话者提供独立解决困难的机会;(iii) 产生视觉信号,如面部手势。鉴于这些结果,有人认为 OIR 在会话中的其他谈话轮次中具有优先权,因此不受一般情况下推动快速轮次转换的相同规则和约束的限制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87d7/4357221/b572d5092bb1/fpsyg-06-00250-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87d7/4357221/c54b7557cbd7/fpsyg-06-00250-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87d7/4357221/af7df1f3adc9/fpsyg-06-00250-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87d7/4357221/621cd4ee6bb3/fpsyg-06-00250-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87d7/4357221/e538174b2112/fpsyg-06-00250-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87d7/4357221/08555de3a372/fpsyg-06-00250-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87d7/4357221/64d708fa3065/fpsyg-06-00250-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87d7/4357221/b572d5092bb1/fpsyg-06-00250-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87d7/4357221/c54b7557cbd7/fpsyg-06-00250-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87d7/4357221/af7df1f3adc9/fpsyg-06-00250-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87d7/4357221/621cd4ee6bb3/fpsyg-06-00250-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87d7/4357221/e538174b2112/fpsyg-06-00250-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87d7/4357221/08555de3a372/fpsyg-06-00250-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87d7/4357221/64d708fa3065/fpsyg-06-00250-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87d7/4357221/b572d5092bb1/fpsyg-06-00250-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
The intersection of turn-taking and repair: the timing of other-initiations of repair in conversation.话轮转换与修补的交叉:会话中他人修补启动的时机。
Front Psychol. 2015 Mar 12;6:250. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00250. eCollection 2015.
2
Expanded transition spaces: the case of Garrwa.扩展的过渡空间:以 Garrwa 为例。
Front Psychol. 2015 Mar 10;6:251. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00251. eCollection 2015.
3
Word frequency and cognitive effort in turns-at-talk: turn structure affects processing load in natural conversation.轮流交谈中的词频与认知努力:话轮结构影响自然对话中的处理负荷。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jun 5;15:1208029. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1208029. eCollection 2024.
4
Turn-taking in human face-to-face interaction is multimodal: gaze direction and manual gestures aid the coordination of turn transitions.人类面对面互动中的话轮转换是多模态的:注视方向和手动手势有助于协调话轮转换。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 Apr 24;378(1875):20210473. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0473. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
5
Overrated gaps: Inter-speaker gaps provide limited information about the timing of turns in conversation.被高估的间隙:说话者之间的间隙提供的关于对话中轮次时间的信息有限。
Cognition. 2022 Jun;223:105037. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105037. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
6
Competition Reduces Response Times in Multiparty Conversation.竞争会缩短多方对话中的反应时间。
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 16;12:693124. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.693124. eCollection 2021.
7
An oscillator model of the timing of turn-taking.轮流发言时机的振荡器模型。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Dec;12(6):957-68. doi: 10.3758/bf03206432.
8
The occurrence of 'what', 'where', 'what house' and other repair initiations in the home environment of hearing-impaired individuals.听障人士家庭环境中“什么”、“哪里”、“什么房子”等维修启动的发生情况。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2013 Jan;48(1):66-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-6984.2012.00187.x. Epub 2012 Oct 4.
9
Turn-timing in signed conversations: coordinating stroke-to-stroke turn boundaries.手语对话中的轮次转换:协调逐轮次的轮次界限
Front Psychol. 2015 Mar 24;6:268. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00268. eCollection 2015.
10
Visual bodily signals and conversational context benefit the anticipation of turn ends.视觉身体信号和会话语境有利于话语结束的预测。
Cognition. 2024 Jul;248:105806. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105806. Epub 2024 May 14.

引用本文的文献

1
The Use of Conversational Repairs in Interactions Involving People With Parkinson's Disease: A Large Corpus Comparison Study.帕金森病患者互动中会话修正的使用:一项大型语料库比较研究
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2025 Jul 8;68(7):3090-3106. doi: 10.1044/2025_JSLHR-24-00802. Epub 2025 Jun 4.
2
Eyebrow movements as signals of communicative problems in human face-to-face interaction.在人类面对面互动中,眉毛运动作为交流问题的信号。
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 Mar 12;12(3):241632. doi: 10.1098/rsos.241632. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
The Limitations of Large Language Models for Understanding Human Language and Cognition.

本文引用的文献

1
Unaddressed participants' gaze in multi-person interaction: optimizing recipiency.多人互动中未被关注的参与者目光:优化接受度。
Front Psychol. 2015 Feb 9;6:98. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00098. eCollection 2015.
2
Variation in dual-task performance reveals late initiation of speech planning in turn-taking.双重任务表现的差异揭示了轮流对话中言语规划的延迟启动。
Cognition. 2015 Mar;136:304-24. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.10.008. Epub 2014 Dec 15.
3
Early anticipation lies behind the speed of response in conversation.对话中的快速反应背后是提前预判。
大语言模型在理解人类语言和认知方面的局限性。
Open Mind (Camb). 2024 Aug 31;8:1058-1083. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00160. eCollection 2024.
4
An Active-Inference Approach to Second-Person Neuroscience.主动推理视角下的第二人称神经科学
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2024 Nov;19(6):931-951. doi: 10.1177/17456916231188000. Epub 2023 Aug 11.
5
Specific facial signals associate with categories of social actions conveyed through questions.特定的面部信号与通过问题传达的社会行为类别相关联。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 19;18(7):e0288104. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288104. eCollection 2023.
6
Turn-timing in conversations between autistic adults: Typical short-gap transitions are preferred, but not achieved instantly.自闭症成人对话中的转场时机:虽然更喜欢典型的短间隙转场,但无法立即实现。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 6;18(4):e0284029. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284029. eCollection 2023.
7
Visual bodily signals as core devices for coordinating minds in interaction.视觉身体信号作为互动中协调思维的核心装置。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 Sep 12;377(1859):20210094. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0094. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
8
Competition Reduces Response Times in Multiparty Conversation.竞争会缩短多方对话中的反应时间。
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 16;12:693124. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.693124. eCollection 2021.
9
The Kinematics of Social Action: Visual Signals Provide Cues for What Interlocutors Do in Conversation.社会行为的运动学:视觉信号为对话中交谈者的行为提供线索。
Brain Sci. 2021 Jul 28;11(8):996. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11080996.
10
When Speech Stops, Gesture Stops: Evidence From Developmental and Crosslinguistic Comparisons.言语停止时,手势亦停止:来自发展性及跨语言比较的证据。
Front Psychol. 2018 Jun 1;9:879. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00879. eCollection 2018.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 Nov;26(11):2530-9. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00673. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
4
Identifying a temporal threshold of tolerance for silent gaps after requests.确定请求后无声间隙的容忍时间阈值。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Jun;133(6):EL471-7. doi: 10.1121/1.4802900.
5
Prediction of turn-ends based on anticipation of upcoming words.基于对即将到来的单词的预测来预测转折词。
Front Psychol. 2012 Oct 1;3:376. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00376. eCollection 2012.
6
The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components: a critical update.词汇产生成分的时空特征:批判性更新。
Front Psychol. 2011 Oct 12;2:255. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00255. eCollection 2011.
7
Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation.对话中轮流发言的普遍性与文化差异。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jun 30;106(26):10587-92. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903616106. Epub 2009 Jun 24.
8
Effects of gaze-aversion on visual-spatial imagination.目光回避对视觉空间想象力的影响。
Br J Psychol. 2009 Aug;100(Pt 3):553-63. doi: 10.1348/000712608X371762. Epub 2008 Nov 19.
9
Gaze aversion: a response to cognitive or social difficulty?目光回避:对认知或社交困难的一种反应?
Mem Cognit. 2005 Jun;33(4):727-33. doi: 10.3758/bf03195338.
10
The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components.词汇生成成分的时空特征。
Cognition. 2004 May-Jun;92(1-2):101-44. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2002.06.001.