Heaton Janet, Day Jo, Britten Nicky
University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Qual Health Res. 2015 Nov;25(11):1477-91. doi: 10.1177/1049732315580104. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
In this article, we present the findings of a participatory realistic evaluation of a 5-year program of health care research intended to promote the translation of knowledge into routine clinical practice. The program was one of the nine pilot Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care funded by the English National Institute for Health Research between 2008 and 2013. Our aim was to delineate the mechanisms by which, and circumstances in which, some projects carried out under the program achieved success in knowledge translation while others were frustrated. Using qualitative methods, we examined how closer collaboration between academics and clinicians worked in four purposefully chosen case studies. In a synthesis of the findings, we produced a "black box" model of how knowledge translation was enabled by the activation of nine mechanisms. These are summarized in the form of five simple rules for promoting knowledge translation through collaborations based on principles of coproduction.
在本文中,我们展示了一项针对旨在促进知识转化为常规临床实践的为期5年的医疗保健研究项目的参与式现实评估结果。该项目是2008年至2013年间由英国国家卫生研究院资助的九个应用健康研究与照护领导力试点合作项目之一。我们的目的是描绘出该项目下开展的一些项目在知识转化方面取得成功而另一些项目却遭遇挫折的机制及情形。我们运用定性方法,在四个经过特意挑选的案例研究中考察了学者与临床医生之间更紧密的合作是如何发挥作用的。在对研究结果进行综合分析时,我们构建了一个 “黑箱” 模型,用以说明通过激活九种机制实现知识转化的过程。这些机制以五条基于共同生产原则促进合作知识转化的简单规则的形式进行了总结。