Moore E E, Shackford S R, Pachter H L, McAninch J W, Browner B D, Champion H R, Flint L M, Gennarelli T A, Malangoni M A, Ramenofsky M L
Department of Surgery, Denver General Hospital, CO 80204-4507.
J Trauma. 1989 Dec;29(12):1664-6.
The Organ Injury Scaling (O.I.S.) Committee of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (A.A.S.T.) was appointed by President Trunkey at the 1987 Annual Meeting. The principal charge was to devise injury severity scores for individual organs to facilitate clinical research. The resultant classification scheme is fundamentally an anatomic description, scaled from 1 to 5, representing the least to the most severe injury. A number of similar scales have been developed in the past, but none has been uniformly adopted. In fact, this concept was introduced at the A.A.S.T. in 1979 as the Abdominal Trauma Index (A.T.I.) and has proved useful in several areas of clinical research. The enclosed O.I.S.'s for spleen, liver, and kidney represent an amalgamation of previous scales applied for these organs, and a consensus of the O.I.S. Committee as well as the A.A.S.T. Board of Managers. The O.I.S. differs from the Abbreviated Injury Score (A.I.S.), which is also based on an anatomic scale but designed to reflect the impact of a specific organ injury on ultimate patient outcome. The individual A.I.S.'s are, of course, the basic elements used to calculate the Injury Severity Score (I.S.S.) as well as T.R.I.S.S. methodology. To ensure that the O.I.S. interdiffuses with the A.I.S. and I.C.D.-9 codes, these are listed alongside the respective O.I.S. Both the currently used A.I.S. 85 and proposed A.I.S. 90 are provided because of the obligatory transition period. Indeed, A.I.S. 90 contains the identical descriptive text as the current O.I.S.'s. The Abdominal Trauma Index and other similar indices using organ injury scoring can be easily modified by replacing older scores with the O.I.S.'s.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
美国创伤外科协会(A.A.S.T.)的器官损伤分级(O.I.S.)委员会由特伦基主席在1987年年会时任命。主要职责是为各个器官制定损伤严重程度评分,以促进临床研究。最终的分类方案本质上是一种解剖学描述,从1到5分级,代表从最轻到最严重的损伤。过去已开发出一些类似的分级系统,但没有一个被统一采用。事实上,这个概念在1979年的美国创伤外科协会会议上作为腹部创伤指数(A.T.I.)被提出,并已在临床研究的多个领域证明是有用的。随附的脾脏、肝脏和肾脏的O.I.S.代表了先前应用于这些器官的分级系统的融合,以及O.I.S.委员会和美国创伤外科协会管理委员会的共识。O.I.S.与简明损伤评分(A.I.S.)不同,后者也基于解剖学分级,但旨在反映特定器官损伤对最终患者结局的影响。当然,各个A.I.S.是用于计算损伤严重程度评分(I.S.S.)以及创伤严重度特征评分(T.R.I.S.S.)方法的基本要素。为确保O.I.S.与A.I.S.和国际疾病分类第九版(I.C.D.-9)编码相互兼容,这些编码与各自的O.I.S.并列列出。由于必须经历的过渡期,同时提供了当前使用的A.I.S. 85和提议的A.I.S. 90。实际上,A.I.S. 90包含与当前O.I.S.相同的描述性文本。通过用O.I.S.替换旧的评分,腹部创伤指数和其他使用器官损伤评分的类似指数可以轻松修改。(摘要截短至250字)