Mansouri Kaweh, Weinreb Robert N, Liu John H K
Hamilton Glaucoma Center and Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America; Glaucoma Sector, Department of Ophthalmology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Hamilton Glaucoma Center and Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2015 May 5;10(5):e0125530. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125530. eCollection 2015.
To study performance of a contact lens sensor (CLS) for 24-hour monitoring of IOP-related short-term patterns and compare with IOP obtained by pneumatonometry.
Prospective clinical trial. Thirty-one healthy volunteers and 2 glaucoma patients were housed for 24 hours in a sleep laboratory. One randomly selected eye was fitted with a CLS (Triggerfish, Sensimed, Switzerland), which measures changes in ocular circumference. In the contralateral eye, IOP measurements were taken using a pneumatonometer every two hours with subjects in the habitual body positions. Heart rate (HR) was measured 3 times during the night for periods of 6 minutes separated by 2 hours. Performance of CLS was defined in two ways: 1) recording the known pattern of IOP increase going from awake (sitting position) to sleep (recumbent), defined as the wake/sleep (W/S) slope and 2) accuracy of the ocular pulse frequency (OPF) concurrent to that of the HR interval. Strength of association between overall CLS and pneumatonometer curves was assessed using coefficients of determination (R2).
The W/S slope was statistically significantly positive in both eyes of each subject (CLS, 57.0 ± 40.5 mVeq/h, p<0.001 and 1.6 ± 0.9 mmHg/h, p<0.05 in the contralateral eye). In all, 87 CLS plots concurrent to the HR interval were evaluated. Graders agreed on evaluability for OPF in 83.9% of CLS plots. Accuracy of the CLS to detect the OPF was 86.5%. Coefficient of correlation between CLS and pneumatonometer for the mean 24-h curve was R2 = 0.914.
CLS measurements compare well to the pneumatonometer and may be of practical use for detection of sleep-induced IOP changes. The CLS also is able to detect ocular pulsations with good accuracy in a majority of eyes.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01390779.
研究用于24小时监测眼压相关短期模式的隐形眼镜传感器(CLS)的性能,并与眼压计测量的眼压进行比较。
前瞻性临床试验。31名健康志愿者和2名青光眼患者在睡眠实验室中停留24小时。随机选择一只眼睛佩戴CLS(Triggerfish,Sensimed,瑞士),该传感器测量眼周长的变化。在对侧眼,在受试者处于习惯体位时,每两小时使用眼压计测量眼压。夜间测量心率(HR)3次,每次持续6分钟,间隔2小时。CLS的性能通过两种方式定义:1)记录从清醒(坐姿)到睡眠(卧位)眼压升高的已知模式,定义为清醒/睡眠(W/S)斜率;2)眼脉搏频率(OPF)与心率间隔的准确性。使用决定系数(R2)评估CLS和眼压计曲线之间的总体关联强度。
每位受试者双眼的W/S斜率在统计学上均显著为正(CLS,57.0±40.5 mVeq/h,p<0.001;对侧眼为1.6±0.9 mmHg/h,p<0.05)。总共评估了87条与心率间隔同时出现的CLS曲线。分级者对83.9%的CLS曲线的OPF可评估性达成一致。CLS检测OPF的准确率为86.5%。24小时平均曲线下CLS与眼压计之间的相关系数为R2 = 0.9