Minozzi Silvia, Amato Laura, Pani Pier Paolo, Solimini Renata, Vecchi Simona, De Crescenzo Franco, Zuccaro Piergiorgio, Davoli Marina
Department of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service, Via di Santa Costanza, 53, Rome, Italy, 00198.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 May 27;2015(5):CD003352. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003352.pub4.
Cocaine misuse is a disorder for which no pharmacological treatment of proven efficacy exists. Advances in neurobiology could guide future medication development.
To investigate the efficacy and acceptability of dopamine agonists alone or in combination with any psychosocial intervention for the treatment of of people who misuse cocaine.
We run the search on 12 January 2015. We searched the Cochrane Drugs and Alcohol Group (CDAG) Specialized Register, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, ICTRP, clinicaltrials.gov and screened reference lists.
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) comparing dopamine agonists alone or associated with psychosocial intervention with placebo, no treatment or other pharmacological interventions.
We used standard Cochrane methodological procedures.
Twenty four studies, including 2147 participants, met the inclusion criteria. Comparing any dopamine agonist versus placebo, we found no differences for any of the outcomes considered: dropout (moderate quality of evidence), abstinence (low quality of evidence), severity of dependence (low quality of evidence), adverse events (moderate quality of evidence). This was also observed when single dopamine agonists were compared against placebo. Comparing amantadine versus antidepressants, we found low quality of evidence that antidepressants performed better for abstinence (RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.53) based on two studies with 44 participants. No differences were found for dropout or adverse events, for both moderate quality of evidence.The major flaws of the included studies concerned selection bias because most studies did not report information about sequence generation (80%) and allocation concealment methods (86%): half of the included studies were judged at unclear risk of performance bias and 62.5% at unclear risk of detection bias for what concerns subjective outcomes.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence from RCTs does not support the use of dopamine agonists for treating cocaine misuse. This absence of evidence may leave to clinicians the alternative of balancing the possible benefits against the potential adverse effects of the treatment. Even the potential benefit of combining a dopamine agonist with a more potent psychosocial intervention, which was suggested by the previous Cochrane Review (Soares 2003), is not supported by the results of this Cochrane Review update.
可卡因滥用是一种尚无经证实有效的药物治疗方法的疾病。神经生物学的进展可为未来的药物研发提供指导。
研究多巴胺激动剂单独使用或与任何心理社会干预措施联合使用治疗可卡因滥用者的疗效和可接受性。
我们于2015年1月12日进行检索。检索了考科蓝药物与酒精研究组(CDAG)专业注册库、PubMed、EMBASE、CINAHL、PsycINFO、ICTRP、clinicaltrials.gov,并筛选了参考文献列表。
比较单独使用多巴胺激动剂或与心理社会干预联合使用与安慰剂、不治疗或其他药物干预措施的随机对照试验(RCT)和对照临床试验(CCT)。
我们采用了标准的考科蓝方法学程序。
24项研究(包括2147名参与者)符合纳入标准。比较任何多巴胺激动剂与安慰剂,我们发现所考虑的任何结局均无差异:脱落率(证据质量中等)、戒断率(证据质量低)、依赖严重程度(证据质量低)、不良事件(证据质量中等)。单独比较多巴胺激动剂与安慰剂时也观察到了这一点。比较金刚烷胺与抗抑郁药,基于两项有44名参与者的研究,我们发现证据质量低,抗抑郁药在戒断方面表现更好(RR 0.25,95%CI 0.12至0.53)。对于脱落率或不良事件,证据质量中等,未发现差异。纳入研究的主要缺陷涉及选择偏倚,因为大多数研究未报告序列产生(80%)和分配隐藏方法(86%)的信息:对于主观结局,纳入研究中有一半被判定为执行偏倚风险不明,62.5%被判定为检测偏倚风险不明。
随机对照试验的现有证据不支持使用多巴胺激动剂治疗可卡因滥用。缺乏这方面的证据可能使临床医生只能权衡治疗的潜在益处与潜在不良反应。考科蓝系统评价的本次更新结果也不支持此前考科蓝系统评价(Soares,2003年)所提出的将多巴胺激动剂与更有效的心理社会干预联合使用的潜在益处。