Tranberg Rona, Alexander Susan, Hatcher Deborah, Mackey Sandra, Shahid Shaouli, Holden Lynda, Kwok Cannas
School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Western Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Western Australian Centre for Rural Health (WACRH), University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Psychooncology. 2016 Feb;25(2):131-41. doi: 10.1002/pon.3900. Epub 2015 Jul 7.
We aim to systematically review studies that identify factors influencing cancer treatment decision-making among indigenous peoples.
Following the outline suggested by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis, a rigorous systematic review and meta-synthesis were conducted of factors that influence cancer treatment decision-making by indigenous peoples. A total of 733 articles were retrieved from eight databases and a manual search. After screening the titles and abstracts, the full text of 26 articles were critically appraised, resulting in five articles that met inclusion criteria for the review. Because the five articles to be reviewed were qualitative studies, the Critical Appraisal Skills Program toolkit was used to evaluate the methodological quality. A thematic synthesis was employed to identify common themes across the studies.
Multiple socio-economic and cultural factors were identified that all had the potential to influence cancer treatment decision-making by indigenous people. These factors were distilled into four themes: spiritual beliefs, cultural influences, communication and existing healthcare systems and structures.
Although existing research identified multiple factors influencing decision-making, this review identified that quality studies in this domain are scarce. There is scope for further investigation, both into decision-making factors and into the subsequent design of culturally appropriate programmes and services that meet the needs of indigenous peoples.
我们旨在系统回顾那些确定影响原住民癌症治疗决策因素的研究。
按照系统评价与Meta分析的首选报告项目所建议的大纲,对影响原住民癌症治疗决策的因素进行了严格的系统回顾和Meta综合分析。通过八个数据库检索及手工检索,共获取733篇文章。在筛选标题和摘要后,对26篇文章的全文进行了严格评估,最终有5篇文章符合该综述的纳入标准。由于要回顾的这5篇文章均为定性研究,因此使用批判性评估技能计划工具包来评估其方法学质量。采用主题综合分析来确定各项研究中的共同主题。
确定了多个社会经济和文化因素,所有这些因素都有可能影响原住民的癌症治疗决策。这些因素被归纳为四个主题:精神信仰、文化影响、沟通以及现有的医疗保健系统和结构。
尽管现有研究确定了多个影响决策的因素,但本次综述发现该领域的高质量研究稀缺。对于决策因素以及后续设计符合文化特点、满足原住民需求的项目和服务,仍有进一步研究的空间。