El Ouali El Mokhtar, Zouhal Hassane, Bahije Loubna, Ibrahimi Azeddine, Benamar Bahae, Kartibou Jihan, Saeidi Ayoub, Laher Ismail, El Harane Sanae, Granacher Urs, Mesfioui Abdelhalem
Laboratory of Biology and Health, Department of Biology, Ibn Tofail University of Kenitra, Kénitra 14000, Morocco.
Movement, Sport, Health and Sciences Laboratory (M2S), UFR-STAPS, University of Rennes 2-ENS Cachan, Av. Charles Tillon, 35044 Rennes, France.
Sports (Basel). 2023 Mar 20;11(3):71. doi: 10.3390/sports11030071.
Oral pathologies can cause athletic underperformance. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of malocclusion on maximal aerobic capacity in young athletes with the same anthropometric data, diet, training mode, and intensity from the same athletics training center. Sub-elite track and field athletes (middle-distance runners) with malocclusion (experimental group (EG); n = 37; 21 girls; age: 15.1 ± 1.5 years) and without malocclusion (control group (CG); n = 13; 5 girls; age: 14.7 ± 1.9 years) volunteered to participate in this study. Participants received an oral diagnosis to examine malocclusion, which was defined as an overlapping of teeth that resulted in impaired contact between the teeth of the mandible and the teeth of the upper jaw. Maximal aerobic capacity was assessed using the VAMEVAL test (calculated MAS and estimated VO). The test consisted of baseline values that included the following parameters: maximum aerobic speed (MAS), maximal oxygen uptake (VO), heart rate frequency, systolic (SAP) and diastolic arterial pressure (DAP), blood lactate concentration (LBP), and post-exercise blood lactate assessment (LAP) after the performance of the VAMEVAL test. There were no statistically significant differences between the two study groups related to either anthropometric data (age: EG = 15.1 ± 1.5 vs. CC = 14.7 ± 1.9 years ( = 0.46); BMI: EG = 19.25 ± 1.9 vs. CC = 19.42 ± 1.7 kg/m ( = 0.76)) or for the following physical fitness parameters and biomarkers: MAS: EG = 15.5 (14.5-16.5) vs. CG = 15.5 (15-17) km/h ( = 0.47); VO: EG = 54.2 (52.5-58.6) vs. CG = 54.2 (53.4-59.5) mL/kg/min ( = 0.62) (IQR (Q1-Q3)); heart rate before the physical test: EG = 77.1 ± 9.9 vs. CG = 74.3 ± 14.0 bpm ( = 0.43); SAP: EG = 106.6 ± 13.4 vs. CG = 106.2 ± 14.8 mmHg ( = 0.91); DAP: EG = 66.7 ± 9.1 vs. CG = 63.9 ± 10.2 mmHg ( = 0.36); LBP: EG = 1.5 ± 0.4 vs. CG = 1.3 ± 0.4 mmol/L ( = 0.12); and LAP: EG = 4.5 ± 2.36 vs. CG = 4.06 ± 3.04 mmol/L ( = 0.60). Our study suggests that dental malocclusion does not impede maximal aerobic capacity and the athletic performance of young track and field athletes.
口腔疾病会导致运动员表现不佳。本研究的目的是确定在来自同一田径训练中心、具有相同人体测量数据、饮食、训练模式和强度的年轻运动员中,错牙合对最大有氧能力的影响。患有错牙合的次精英田径运动员(中长跑运动员)(实验组(EG);n = 37;21名女孩;年龄:15.1±1.5岁)和没有错牙合的(对照组(CG);n = 13;5名女孩;年龄:14.7±1.9岁)自愿参加本研究。参与者接受口腔诊断以检查错牙合,错牙合被定义为牙齿重叠,导致下颌牙齿与上颌牙齿之间接触受损。使用VAMEVAL测试(计算MAS和估计VO)评估最大有氧能力。该测试包括基线值,这些基线值包括以下参数:最大有氧速度(MAS)、最大摄氧量(VO)、心率频率、收缩压(SAP)和舒张压(DAP)、血乳酸浓度(LBP)以及VAMEVAL测试后运动后血乳酸评估(LAP)。两个研究组在人体测量数据(年龄:EG = 15.1±1.5岁 vs. CC = 14.7±1.9岁(P = 0.46);BMI:EG = 19.25±1.9 vs. CC = 19.42±1.7 kg/m²(P = 0.76))或以下身体素质参数和生物标志物方面均无统计学显著差异:MAS:EG = 第15.5(14.5 - 16.5) vs. CG = 15.5(15 - 17)km/h(P = 0.47);VO:EG = 54.2(52.5 - 58.6) vs. CG = 54.2(53.4 - 59.5)mL/kg/min(P = 0.62)(四分位距(Q1 - Q3));体能测试前心率:EG = 77.1±9.9 vs. CG = 74.3±14.0次/分钟(P = 0.43);SAP:EG = 106.6±13.4 vs. CG = 106.2±14.8 mmHg(P = 0.91);DAP:EG = 66.7±9.1 vs. CG = 63.9±10.2 mmHg(P = 0.36);LBP:EG = 1.5±0.4 vs. CG = 1.3±0.4 mmol/L(P = 0.12);以及LAP:EG = 4.5±2.36 vs. CG = 4.06±3.04 mmol/L(P = 0.60)。我们的研究表明,牙齿错牙合不会妨碍年轻田径运动员的最大有氧能力和运动表现。