Suppr超能文献

两种用于前房角测量的光谱域光学相干断层扫描设备之间的可重复性和一致性

Reproducibility and Agreement Between 2 Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Devices for Anterior Chamber Angle Measurements.

作者信息

Marion Kenneth M, Maram Jyotsna, Pan Xiaojing, Dastiridou Anna, Zhang ZhouYuan, Ho Alex, Francis Brian A, Sadda Srinivas R, Chopra Vikas

机构信息

*Doheny Image Reading Center, Doheny Eye Institute ‡Department of Ophthalmology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA †The Affiliated Hospital of Medical College, Qingdao University Qingdao, Shandong, P.R. China.

出版信息

J Glaucoma. 2015 Dec;24(9):642-6. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000303.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare anterior chamber angle parameters based on the location of Schwalbe line (SL) from 2 spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) instruments and to measure their reproducibility.

METHODS

Forty-two eyes from 21 normal, healthy participants underwent imaging of the inferior irido-corneal angle with the Spectralis and Cirrus SD-OCT under tightly controlled low-light conditions. SL-angle opening distance (SL-AOD) and SL-trabecular iris space area (SL-TISA) were measured by masked, certified graders at the Doheny Imaging Reading Center using customized grading software. Interinstrument and intrainstrument, as well as interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility of SL-AOD and SL-TISA measurements were evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman plots with limits of agreement (LoA).

RESULTS

The mean SL-AOD was 0.662±0.191 mm in Spectralis and 0.677±0.213 mm in Cirrus. The mean SL-TISA was 0.250±0.073 mm in Spectralis and 0.256±0.082 mm in Cirrus. The agreement for intrainstrument (ICCs>0.979), intragrader (ICCs>0.992), and intergrader (ICCs>0.929) was excellent. Excellent agreement between the 2 devices was also documented with a mean difference of -0.016 (LoA -0.125 to 0.092) mm for SL-AOD and -0.007 (LoA -0.056 to 0.043) mm in SL-TISA.

CONCLUSIONS

Both SD-OCTs provided comparable measurements and permitted calculation of SL-based angle metrics. There was excellent interinstrument and intrainstrument and intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility for Spectralis and Cirrus SD-OCTs, suggesting true interchangeability between SD-OCT devices. This has the potential to lead to development of standardized grading assessments and quantification of angle parameters that would be valid across various SD-OCT devices.

摘要

目的

基于2种光谱域光学相干断层扫描(SD - OCT)仪器中施瓦贝线(SL)的位置比较前房角参数,并测量其可重复性。

方法

21名正常健康参与者的42只眼睛在严格控制的低光照条件下,使用Spectralis和Cirrus SD - OCT对下方虹膜角膜角进行成像。在多希尼影像阅读中心,由经过认证的掩蔽分级人员使用定制的分级软件测量SL - 房角开放距离(SL - AOD)和SL - 小梁虹膜空间面积(SL - TISA)。通过组内相关系数(ICC)和带有一致性界限(LoA)的布兰德 - 奥特曼图评估SL - AOD和SL - TISA测量的仪器间、仪器内以及观察者间和观察者内的可重复性。

结果

Spectralis中SL - AOD的平均值为0.662±0.191毫米,Cirrus中为0.677±0.213毫米。Spectralis中SL - TISA的平均值为0.250±0.073毫米,Cirrus中为0.256±0.082毫米。仪器内(ICC>0.979)、分级人员内(ICC>0.992)和分级人员间(ICC>0.929)的一致性极佳。两种设备之间的一致性也很出色,SL - AOD的平均差异为 - 0.016(LoA - 0.125至0.092)毫米,SL - TISA的平均差异为 - 0.007(LoA - 0.056至0.043)毫米。

结论

两种SD - OCT均提供了可比的测量结果,并允许计算基于SL的房角指标。Spectralis和Cirrus SD - OCT在仪器间、仪器内以及观察者间和观察者内具有出色的可重复性,表明SD - OCT设备之间具有真正的互换性。这有可能导致开发标准化的分级评估方法以及对房角参数进行量化,这些参数在各种SD - OCT设备上都是有效的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02c9/4667752/49df5049bccc/ijg-24-642-g005.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验