Bailey Stacy Cooper, Annis Izabela E, Reuland Daniel S, Locklear Autumn D, Sleath Betsy L, Wolf Michael S
Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015 Jul 31;9:1101-8. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S85411. eCollection 2015.
Current adherence scales often fail to assess the full spectrum of behaviors associated with safe and appropriate drug use and may be unsuitable for patients with limited health literacy. We sought to develop and evaluate a comprehensive yet brief Measure of Drug Self-Management (MeDS) for use in research and clinical settings among diverse patient groups.
Expert opinion, literature reviews, and interviews with patients and providers were utilized to create and revise potential items. Item performance testing was then conducted among 193 adult English-speaking patients with hypertension and diabetes. Factor analysis was used to inform item selection. Reliability was assessed via calculations of internal consistency. To assess construct and predictive validity, MeDS scores were compared with scores from the 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale and relevant clinical measures (HbA1c, blood pressure, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol).
The MeDS demonstrated adequate internal consistency with a Cronbach's α of 0.72. The MeDS was significantly correlated with the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (r= -0.62; P<0.001). The MeDS was also associated with clinical measures, with statistically significant correlations found between MeDS scores and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (r= -0.27, P≤0.001) and diastolic blood pressure (r= -0.18, P=0.01).
The MeDS seems to be a valid and reliable tool that can be used to assess medication self-management skills among diverse patients, including those with limited literacy skills. Future studies are needed to test the tool in actual use and explore clinical applications.
目前的依从性量表往往无法全面评估与安全合理用药相关的所有行为,可能不适用于健康素养有限的患者。我们试图开发并评估一种全面且简洁的药物自我管理量表(MeDS),用于不同患者群体的研究和临床环境。
利用专家意见、文献综述以及对患者和医护人员的访谈来创建和修订潜在条目。随后在193名成年英语-speaking高血压和糖尿病患者中进行条目性能测试。采用因子分析来指导条目选择。通过计算内部一致性来评估信度。为评估结构效度和预测效度,将MeDS得分与8项Morisky药物依从性量表得分及相关临床指标(糖化血红蛋白、血压和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇)进行比较。
MeDS显示出足够的内部一致性,Cronbach's α为0.72。MeDS与Morisky药物依从性量表显著相关(r = -0.62;P < 0.001)。MeDS还与临床指标相关,MeDS得分与低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(r = -0.27,P≤0.001)和舒张压(r = -0.18,P = 0.01)之间存在统计学显著相关性。
MeDS似乎是一种有效且可靠的工具,可用于评估不同患者(包括那些识字技能有限的患者)的药物自我管理技能。未来需要进行研究以测试该工具在实际使用中的情况并探索其临床应用。