Suppr超能文献

药物自我管理量表的开发与评估

Development and evaluation of the Measure of Drug Self-Management.

作者信息

Bailey Stacy Cooper, Annis Izabela E, Reuland Daniel S, Locklear Autumn D, Sleath Betsy L, Wolf Michael S

机构信息

Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

出版信息

Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015 Jul 31;9:1101-8. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S85411. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Current adherence scales often fail to assess the full spectrum of behaviors associated with safe and appropriate drug use and may be unsuitable for patients with limited health literacy. We sought to develop and evaluate a comprehensive yet brief Measure of Drug Self-Management (MeDS) for use in research and clinical settings among diverse patient groups.

METHODS

Expert opinion, literature reviews, and interviews with patients and providers were utilized to create and revise potential items. Item performance testing was then conducted among 193 adult English-speaking patients with hypertension and diabetes. Factor analysis was used to inform item selection. Reliability was assessed via calculations of internal consistency. To assess construct and predictive validity, MeDS scores were compared with scores from the 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale and relevant clinical measures (HbA1c, blood pressure, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol).

RESULTS

The MeDS demonstrated adequate internal consistency with a Cronbach's α of 0.72. The MeDS was significantly correlated with the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (r= -0.62; P<0.001). The MeDS was also associated with clinical measures, with statistically significant correlations found between MeDS scores and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (r= -0.27, P≤0.001) and diastolic blood pressure (r= -0.18, P=0.01).

CONCLUSION

The MeDS seems to be a valid and reliable tool that can be used to assess medication self-management skills among diverse patients, including those with limited literacy skills. Future studies are needed to test the tool in actual use and explore clinical applications.

摘要

背景

目前的依从性量表往往无法全面评估与安全合理用药相关的所有行为,可能不适用于健康素养有限的患者。我们试图开发并评估一种全面且简洁的药物自我管理量表(MeDS),用于不同患者群体的研究和临床环境。

方法

利用专家意见、文献综述以及对患者和医护人员的访谈来创建和修订潜在条目。随后在193名成年英语-speaking高血压和糖尿病患者中进行条目性能测试。采用因子分析来指导条目选择。通过计算内部一致性来评估信度。为评估结构效度和预测效度,将MeDS得分与8项Morisky药物依从性量表得分及相关临床指标(糖化血红蛋白、血压和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇)进行比较。

结果

MeDS显示出足够的内部一致性,Cronbach's α为0.72。MeDS与Morisky药物依从性量表显著相关(r = -0.62;P < 0.001)。MeDS还与临床指标相关,MeDS得分与低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(r = -0.27,P≤0.001)和舒张压(r = -0.18,P = 0.01)之间存在统计学显著相关性。

结论

MeDS似乎是一种有效且可靠的工具,可用于评估不同患者(包括那些识字技能有限的患者)的药物自我管理技能。未来需要进行研究以测试该工具在实际使用中的情况并探索其临床应用。

相似文献

1
Development and evaluation of the Measure of Drug Self-Management.药物自我管理量表的开发与评估
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015 Jul 31;9:1101-8. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S85411. eCollection 2015.
2
Development and Validation of the Consumer Health Activation Index.消费者健康激活指数的制定与验证。
Med Decis Making. 2018 Apr;38(3):334-343. doi: 10.1177/0272989X17753392. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
7
Development of the medication adherence estimation and differentiation scale (MEDS).用药依从性评估和区分量表(MEDS)的研制。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2019 Apr;35(4):577-585. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1512478. Epub 2018 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

10

本文引用的文献

1
Nurse overestimation of patients' health literacy.护士高估患者的健康素养。
J Health Commun. 2013;18 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):62-9. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2013.825670.
4
Medication adherence: a call for action.药物依从性:行动的呼吁。
Am Heart J. 2011 Sep;162(3):412-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.06.007.
9
Interventions to enhance medication adherence.提高药物依从性的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19(4):CD000011. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000011.pub2.
10
Adherence to medication.药物依从性
N Engl J Med. 2005 Aug 4;353(5):487-97. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra050100.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验