Carson Dean B, Schoo Adrian, Berggren Peter
Northern Institute, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia; Glesbygdsmedicinskt Centrum, Storuman, Sweden; Arctic Research Centre at Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Flinders University Rural Clinical School, Renmark, Australia.
Health Policy. 2015 Dec;119(12):1550-6. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.08.001. Epub 2015 Aug 14.
The major advance in informing rural workforce policy internationally over the past 25 years has been the recognition of the importance of the 'rural pipeline'. The rural pipeline suggests that people with 'rural origin' (who spent some childhood years in rural areas) and/or 'rural exposure' (who do part of their professional training in rural areas) are more likely to select rural work locations. What is not known is whether the rural pipeline also increases the length of time professionals spend in rural practice throughout their careers. This paper analyses data from a survey of rural health professionals in six countries in the northern periphery of Europe in 2013 to examine the relationship between rural origin and rural exposure and the intention to remain in the current rural job or to preference rural jobs in future. Results are compared between countries, between different types of rural areas (based on accessibility to urban centres), different occupations and workers at different stages of their careers. The research concludes that overall the pipeline does impact on retention, and that both rural origin and rural exposure make a contribution. However, the relationship is not strong in all contexts, and health workforce policy should recognise that retention may in some cases be improved by recruiting beyond the pipeline.
在过去25年里,国际上为农村劳动力政策提供信息方面的主要进展是认识到“农村人才输送渠道”的重要性。农村人才输送渠道表明,具有“农村出身”(童年时期在农村度过一些时光)和/或“农村经历”(在农村地区接受部分专业培训)的人更有可能选择在农村工作地点就业。尚不清楚的是,农村人才输送渠道是否也会增加专业人员在整个职业生涯中在农村执业的时间长度。本文分析了2013年对欧洲北部边缘六个国家农村卫生专业人员的一项调查数据,以研究农村出身和农村经历与留在当前农村工作岗位或未来倾向于农村工作岗位的意愿之间的关系。比较了不同国家、不同类型农村地区(基于与城市中心的可达性)、不同职业以及处于职业生涯不同阶段的工作人员之间的结果。研究得出结论,总体而言,人才输送渠道确实对留任意愿有影响,农村出身和农村经历都有作用。然而,这种关系在所有情况下并不都很强,卫生人力政策应认识到,在某些情况下,通过从人才输送渠道之外招募人员,留任意愿可能会得到改善。