Abe Takanori, Saitoh Jun-ichi, Kobayashi Daijiro, Shibuya Kei, Koyama Yoshinori, Shimada Hirohumi, Shirai Katsuyuki, Ohno Tatsuya, Nakano Takashi
Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22, Showa-machi, Maebashi, Gunma, 371-8511, Japan.
Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, 3-39-22, Showa-machi, Maebashi, Gunma, 371-8511, Japan.
Radiat Oncol. 2015 Sep 17;10:187. doi: 10.1186/s13014-015-0491-8.
The purpose of this study was to compare carbon ion radiotherapy (C-ion RT) and stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) with photon beams for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), specifically with regard to the dose volume parameters for target coverage and normal tissue sparing.
Data of 10 patients who were treated using C-ion RT with a total dose of 60 Gy(RBE) in four fractions were used. The virtual plan of SBRT was simulated on the treatment planning computed tomography images of C-ion RT. Dose volume parameters such as minimum dose covering 90% of the planning target volume (PTV D90), homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), mean liver dose (MLD), volume of the liver receiving 5 to 60 Gy (V5-60), and max point dose (Dmax) of gastrointestinal (GI) tract were calculated from both treatment plans.
The PTV D90 was 59.6 ± 0.2 Gy(RBE) in C-ion RT, as compared to 56.6 ± 0.3 Gy in SBRT (p < 0.05). HI and CI were 1.19 ± 0.03 and 0.79 ± 0.06, respectively in C-ion RT, as compared to 1.21 ± 0.01 and 0.37 ± 0.02, respectively in SBRT. Only CI showed a significant difference between two modalities. Mean liver dose was 8.1 ± 1.4 Gy(RBE) in C-ion RT, as compared to 16.1 ± 2.5 Gy in SBRT (p < 0.05). V5 to V50 of liver were higher in SBRT than C-ion RT and significant differences were observed for V5, V10 and V20. Dmax of the GI tract was higher in SBRT than C-ion RT, but did not show a significantly difference.
C-ion RT provides an advantage in both target conformity and normal liver sparing compared with SBRT.
本研究的目的是比较碳离子放疗(C离子放疗)和立体定向放疗(SBRT)联合光子束治疗肝细胞癌(HCC)的效果,特别是在靶区覆盖和正常组织保护的剂量体积参数方面。
使用10例接受总剂量60 Gy(RBE)分4次治疗的C离子放疗患者的数据。在C离子放疗的治疗计划计算机断层扫描图像上模拟SBRT的虚拟计划。从两个治疗计划中计算剂量体积参数,如覆盖90%计划靶体积(PTV D90)的最小剂量、均匀性指数(HI)、适形指数(CI)、平均肝脏剂量(MLD)、接受5至60 Gy的肝脏体积(V5 - 60)以及胃肠道(GI)的最大点剂量(Dmax)。
C离子放疗中PTV D90为59.6±0.2 Gy(RBE),而SBRT中为56.6±0.3 Gy(p < 0.05)。C离子放疗中HI和CI分别为1.19±0.03和0.79±0.06,而SBRT中分别为1.21±0.01和0.37±0.02。只有CI在两种治疗方式之间显示出显著差异。C离子放疗中平均肝脏剂量为8.1±1.4 Gy(RBE),而SBRT中为16.1±2.5 Gy(p < 0.05)。SBRT中肝脏的V5至V50高于C离子放疗,且在V5、V10和V20方面观察到显著差异。SBRT中胃肠道的Dmax高于C离子放疗,但未显示出显著差异。
与SBRT相比,C离子放疗在靶区适形性和正常肝脏保护方面均具有优势。