Papapanou Panos N
Section of Oral and Diagnostic Sciences, Division of Periodontics, Columbia University College of Dental Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Int Dent J. 2015 Dec;65(6):283-91. doi: 10.1111/idj.12185. Epub 2015 Sep 20.
Studies conducted over the past 25 years have focussed on the role of periodontitis, an inflammatory condition of microbial aetiology that destroys the tooth-supporting tissues, as a systemic inflammatory stressor that can act as an independent risk factor of atherosclerotic vascular disease (AVSD) and adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs). It has been suggested that periodontitis-associated bacteraemias and systemic dissemination of inflammatory mediators produced in the periodontal tissues may result in systemic inflammation and endothelial dysfunction, and that bacteria of oral origin may translocate into the feto-placental unit. Epidemiological studies largely support an association between periodontitis and ASVD/APOs, independently of known confounders; indeed, periodontitis has been shown to confer statistically significantly elevated risk for clinical events associated with ASVD and APOs in multivariable adjustments. On the other hand, intervention studies demonstrate that although periodontal therapy reduces systemic inflammation and improves endothelial function, it has no positive effect on the incidence of APOs. Studies of the effects of periodontal interventions on ASVD-related clinical events are lacking. This review summarises key findings from mechanistic, association and intervention studies and attempts to reconcile the seemingly contradictory evidence that originates from different lines of investigation.
过去25年进行的研究聚焦于牙周炎的作用,牙周炎是一种由微生物病因引起的炎症性疾病,会破坏牙齿支持组织,它作为一种全身性炎症应激源,可成为动脉粥样硬化性血管疾病(AVSD)和不良妊娠结局(APO)的独立危险因素。有人提出,与牙周炎相关的菌血症以及牙周组织中产生的炎症介质的全身扩散可能导致全身炎症和内皮功能障碍,并且口腔来源的细菌可能转移至胎儿-胎盘单位。流行病学研究在很大程度上支持牙周炎与ASVD/APO之间的关联,且独立于已知的混杂因素;事实上,在多变量调整中,牙周炎已被证明会使与ASVD和APO相关的临床事件的风险在统计学上显著升高。另一方面,干预研究表明,尽管牙周治疗可减轻全身炎症并改善内皮功能,但对APO的发生率没有积极影响。目前缺乏关于牙周干预对ASVD相关临床事件影响的研究。本综述总结了机制、关联和干预研究的主要发现,并试图调和来自不同研究方向的看似矛盾的证据。