• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

随着时间推移个体内部的情感与框架效应:动态投资模拟中的风险承担

AFFECT AND THE FRAMING EFFECT WITHIN INDIVIDUALS OVER TIME: RISK TAKING IN A DYNAMIC INVESTMENT SIMULATION.

作者信息

Seo Myeong-Gu, Goldfarb Brent, Barrett Lisa Feldman

机构信息

University of Maryland.

Boston College.

出版信息

Acad Manage J. 2010 Apr;53(2):411-431. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2010.49389383.

DOI:10.5465/AMJ.2010.49389383
PMID:26412860
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4580376/
Abstract

We examined the role of affect (pleasant or unpleasant feelings) and decision frames (gains or losses) in risk taking in a 20-day stock investment simulation in which 101 participants rated their current feelings while making investment decisions. As predicted, affect attenuated the relationships between decision frames and risk taking. After experiencing losses, individuals made more risky choices, in keeping with the framing effect. However, this tendency decreased and/or disappeared when loss was simultaneously experienced with either pleasant or unpleasant feelings. Similarly, individuals' tendency to avoid risk after experiencing gains disappeared or even reversed when they simultaneously experienced pleasant feelings.

摘要

我们在一项为期20天的股票投资模拟实验中,研究了情感(愉快或不愉快的感觉)和决策框架(收益或损失)在冒险行为中的作用。该实验中,101名参与者在做出投资决策时对自己当前的感受进行了评分。正如预测的那样,情感减弱了决策框架与冒险行为之间的关系。经历损失后,个体做出了更多的冒险选择,这与框架效应相符。然而,当损失与愉快或不愉快的感觉同时出现时,这种倾向会减弱和/或消失。同样,个体在经历收益后避免风险的倾向在同时体验到愉快感觉时会消失甚至逆转。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3fb/4580376/5b76c9b95c16/nihms244275f2a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3fb/4580376/4b1d2aed8126/nihms244275f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3fb/4580376/5b76c9b95c16/nihms244275f2a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3fb/4580376/4b1d2aed8126/nihms244275f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3fb/4580376/5b76c9b95c16/nihms244275f2a.jpg

相似文献

1
AFFECT AND THE FRAMING EFFECT WITHIN INDIVIDUALS OVER TIME: RISK TAKING IN A DYNAMIC INVESTMENT SIMULATION.随着时间推移个体内部的情感与框架效应:动态投资模拟中的风险承担
Acad Manage J. 2010 Apr;53(2):411-431. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2010.49389383.
2
The sure thing: The role of integral affect in risky choice framing.确定无疑的是:整体情感在风险选择框架中的作用。
Emotion. 2019 Sep;19(6):1035-1043. doi: 10.1037/emo0000505. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
3
Framing effects in group investment decision making: role of group polarization.群体投资决策中的框架效应:群体极化的作用。
Psychol Rep. 2008 Feb;102(1):283-92. doi: 10.2466/pr0.102.1.283-292.
4
To risk or not: The impact of socioeconomic status on preschoolers' risky decision-making for gains and losses.是否冒险:社会经济地位对学龄前儿童获得和失去风险决策的影响。
Dev Sci. 2024 Jul;27(4):e13485. doi: 10.1111/desc.13485. Epub 2024 Feb 13.
5
A neuropsychological approach to understanding risk-taking for potential gains and losses.一种从神经心理学角度理解对潜在收益和损失的冒险行为的方法。
Front Neurosci. 2012 Feb 7;6:15. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2012.00015. eCollection 2012.
6
BEING EMOTIONAL DURING DECISION MAKING-GOOD OR BAD? AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION.决策过程中情绪化——是好是坏?一项实证研究。
Acad Manage J. 2007 Aug;50(4):923-940. doi: 10.5465/amj.2007.26279217.
7
Working memory loads differentially influence frame-induced bias and normative choice in risky decision making.工作记忆负荷对风险决策中的框架诱导偏差和规范选择有差异影响。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 28;14(3):e0214571. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214571. eCollection 2019.
8
Thinking Fast Increases Framing Effects in Risky Decision Making.快速思考会增加风险决策中的框架效应。
Psychol Sci. 2017 Apr;28(4):530-543. doi: 10.1177/0956797616689092. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
9
Conceptualizing and experiencing compassion.概念化和体验同情心。
Emotion. 2013 Oct;13(5):817-21. doi: 10.1037/a0033747. Epub 2013 Aug 5.
10
Altered risk-aversion and risk-taking behaviour in patients with Alzheimer's disease.阿尔茨海默病患者风险规避和冒险行为的改变。
Psychogeriatrics. 2012 Sep;12(3):151-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-8301.2011.00396.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Changing Decisions: The Interaction between Framing and Decoy Effects.改变决策:框架效应与诱饵效应之间的相互作用
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Sep 12;13(9):755. doi: 10.3390/bs13090755.
2
Voice vs. silence: the role of cognitive appraisal of and emotional response to stressors.发声与沉默:对应激源的认知评估及情绪反应的作用
Front Psychol. 2023 Apr 25;14:1079244. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1079244. eCollection 2023.
3
Replicating the Disease framing problem during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic: A study of stress, worry, trust, and choice under risk.在 2020 年 COVID-19 大流行期间复制疾病框架问题:一项关于风险下的压力、担忧、信任和选择的研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 10;16(9):e0257151. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257151. eCollection 2021.
4
: A Framework to Capture and Analyze Personal Life Experiences and the Ways that Technology Shapes Them.一个捕捉和分析个人生活经历以及技术塑造这些经历方式的框架。
Hum Comput Interact. 2021;36(2):150-201. doi: 10.1080/07370024.2019.1578652. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
5
Training in statistical analysis reduces the framing effect among medical students and residents in Argentina.在阿根廷,统计分析培训减少了医学生和住院医师的框架效应。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2020;17:25. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2020.17.25. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
6
Older and wiser? An affective science perspective on age-related challenges in financial decision making.更年长、更明智?情感科学视角下与年龄相关的金融决策挑战。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2011 Apr;6(2):195-206. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsq056. Epub 2010 Jun 29.

本文引用的文献

1
What is an unconscious emotion?(The case for unconscious "liking").什么是无意识情绪?(无意识“喜欢”的例证)
Cogn Emot. 2003 Mar;17(2):181-211. doi: 10.1080/02699930302289.
2
Are Emotions Natural Kinds?情绪是自然种类吗?
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2006 Mar;1(1):28-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00003.x.
3
BEING EMOTIONAL DURING DECISION MAKING-GOOD OR BAD? AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION.决策过程中情绪化——是好是坏?一项实证研究。
Acad Manage J. 2007 Aug;50(4):923-940. doi: 10.5465/amj.2007.26279217.
4
Computer science. Science 2.0.计算机科学。科学2.0。
Science. 2008 Mar 7;319(5868):1349-50. doi: 10.1126/science.1153539.
5
THE ROLE OF AFFECTIVE EXPERIENCE IN WORK MOTIVATION.情感体验在工作动机中的作用。
Acad Manage Rev. 2004 Jul;29(3):423-439.
6
Investment behavior and the negative side of emotion.投资行为与情绪的负面影响。
Psychol Sci. 2005 Jun;16(6):435-9. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01553.x.
7
The intensity of emotion.情感的强度。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 1999;3(1):2-22. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0301_1.
8
Feelings or words? Understanding the content in self-report ratings of experienced emotion.感受还是言语?理解自我报告的情感体验评分中的内容。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Aug;87(2):266-81. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.266.
9
Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations.实验性研究与非实验性研究中的中介作用:新程序与建议
Psychol Methods. 2002 Dec;7(4):422-45.
10
Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion.核心情感与情绪的心理建构。
Psychol Rev. 2003 Jan;110(1):145-72. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.110.1.145.