Nielsen Henrik Krarup, Garcia Javier, Væth Michael, Schlafer Sebastian
Department of Dentistry, HEALTH, Aarhus University, Aarhus, 8000, Denmark.
Department of Biostatistics, HEALTH, Aarhus University, Aarhus, 8000, Denmark.
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 15;10(10):e0140720. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140720. eCollection 2015.
Photoactivated disinfection has a strong local antimicrobial effect. In the field of dentistry it is an emerging adjunct to mechanical debridement during endodontic and periodontal treatment. In the present study, we investigate the effect of photoactivated disinfection using riboflavin as a photosensitizer and blue LED light for activation, and compare it to photoactivated disinfection with the widely used combination of toluidine blue O and red light. Riboflavin is highly biocompatible and can be activated with LED lamps at hand in the dental office. To date, no reports are available on the antimicrobial effect of photoactivated disinfection using riboflavin/blue light on oral microorganisms. Planktonic cultures of eight organisms frequently isolated from periodontal and/or endodontic lesions (Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Candida albicans, Enterococcus faecalis, Escherischia coli, Lactobacillus paracasei, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia and Propionibacterium acnes) were subjected to photoactivated disinfection with riboflavin/blue light and toluidine blue O/red light, and survival rates were determined by CFU counts. Within the limited irradiation time of one minute, photoactivated disinfection with riboflavin/blue light only resulted in minor reductions in CFU counts, whereas full kills were achieved for all organisms when using toluidine blue O/red light. The black pigmented anaerobes P. gingivalis and P. intermedia were eradicated completely by riboflavin/blue light, but also by blue light treatment alone, suggesting that endogenous chromophores acted as photosensitizers in these bacteria. On the basis of our results, riboflavin cannot be recommended as a photosensitizer used for photoactivated disinfection of periodontal or endodontic infections.
光活化消毒具有强大的局部抗菌作用。在牙科领域,它是牙髓病和牙周病治疗中机械清创的一种新兴辅助手段。在本研究中,我们研究了以核黄素作为光敏剂并用蓝色发光二极管(LED)光激活的光活化消毒效果,并将其与广泛使用的甲苯胺蓝O和红光组合的光活化消毒效果进行比较。核黄素具有高度生物相容性,并且可以在牙科诊所使用手头的LED灯进行激活。迄今为止,尚无关于使用核黄素/蓝光进行光活化消毒对口腔微生物抗菌作用的报道。对从牙周和/或牙髓病变中频繁分离出的8种微生物(伴放线聚集杆菌、白色念珠菌、粪肠球菌、大肠杆菌、副干酪乳杆菌、牙龈卟啉单胞菌、中间普氏菌和痤疮丙酸杆菌)的浮游培养物进行核黄素/蓝光和甲苯胺蓝O/红光的光活化消毒,并通过菌落形成单位(CFU)计数确定存活率。在一分钟的有限照射时间内,核黄素/蓝光的光活化消毒仅导致CFU计数略有减少,而使用甲苯胺蓝O/红光时所有微生物均实现了完全杀灭。黑色色素厌氧菌牙龈卟啉单胞菌和中间普氏菌被核黄素/蓝光完全根除,但单独用蓝光处理也能根除,这表明内源性发色团在这些细菌中充当了光敏剂。根据我们的结果,核黄素不能被推荐作为用于牙周或牙髓感染光活化消毒的光敏剂。