Suppr超能文献

儿童伤害的情境决定因素:采用多水平分析方法的研究系统评价

Contextual Determinants of Childhood Injury: A Systematic Review of Studies With Multilevel Analytic Methods.

作者信息

McClure Rod, Kegler Scott, Davey Tamzyn, Clay Fiona

机构信息

Rod McClure and Scott Kegler are with the Division of Analysis, Research, and Practice Integration, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. Tamzyn Davey is with the School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. Fiona Clay is with the Department of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing, and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2015 Dec;105(12):e37-43. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302883. Epub 2015 Oct 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The definition of injury that underpins the contemporary approach to injury prevention is an etiological definition relating to bodily damage arising from transfer of energy to tissues of the body beyond the limits compatible with physiological function. Causal factors proximal to the energy transfer are nested within a more complex set of contextual determinants. For effective injury control, understanding of these determinants is critical.

OBJECTIVES

The primary aims of this study were to describe the area-level determinants that have been included in multilevel analyses of childhood injury and to quantify the relationships between these area-level exposures and injury outcomes.

SEARCH METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of peer-reviewed, English-language literature published in scientific journals between January 1997 and July 2014, reporting studies that employed multilevel analyses to quantify the eco-epidemiological causation of physical unintentional injuries to children aged 16 years and younger. We conducted and reported the review in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included etiological studies of causal risk factors for unintentional traumatic injuries to children aged 0 to 16 years. Methodological inclusion criteria were as follows: Epidemiological studies quantifying the relationship between risk factors (at various levels) and injury occurrence in the individual; Studies that recognized individual exposure and at least 1 higher level of exposure with units at lower levels or microunits (e.g., individuals) nested within units at higher levels or macrounits (e.g., areas or neighborhoods); Injury outcomes (dependent variable) examined at the individual level; and Central analytic techniques belonging to the following categories: multilevel models, hierarchical models, random effects models, random coefficient models, covariance components models, variance components models, and mixed models. We combined criteria from the checklist described by the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Review Group with factors in the STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) statement, and we used several quality assessment items from other injury-related systematic reviews to create a quality assessment checklist for this review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted data and selected analysis features for the included studies by using preformatted tables. They extracted information as reported in the articles. We determined statistical significance of estimates and effects by using the conventional threshold, P < .05. Any differences in the information extracted were resolved by discussion between authors and by specifically rereading and rechecking the facts as reported in the relevant articles. We tabulated results from the final multilevel model(s) in each of the included articles with key aspects summarized in text. Interpretations of the results and identification of key issues raised by the collated material are reported in the Discussion section of this article.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 11,967 articles from the electronic search with only 14 being included in the review after a detailed screening and selection process. Nine of the 14 studies identified significant fixed effects at both the area and individual levels. The area-level variables most consistently associated with child injury rates related to poverty, education, employment, and access to services. There was some evidence that injury rates were lower in areas scoring well on area-level summary measures of neighborhood safety. There was marked variation in the methods used and in the mapping of measured variables onto the conceptual model of ecological causation. AUTHOR CONCLUSIONS: These results help establish the scope for the public policy approach to injury prevention. More consistent reporting of multilevel study results would aid future interpretation and translation of such findings.

摘要

背景

支撑当代伤害预防方法的伤害定义是一种病因学定义,涉及因能量传递至身体组织而导致的身体损伤,且这种能量传递超出了与生理功能相适应的限度。能量传递的近端因果因素嵌套于一系列更为复杂的背景决定因素之中。对于有效的伤害控制而言,理解这些决定因素至关重要。

目的

本研究的主要目的是描述纳入儿童伤害多层次分析的地区层面决定因素,并量化这些地区层面暴露因素与伤害结局之间的关系。

检索方法

我们对1997年1月至2014年7月期间发表在科学期刊上的同行评审英文文献进行了系统综述,报告了采用多层次分析来量化16岁及以下儿童身体意外伤害的生态流行病学因果关系的研究。我们按照PRISMA指南进行并报告了该综述。

选择标准

我们纳入了对0至16岁儿童意外伤害的因果风险因素的病因学研究。方法学纳入标准如下:量化(不同层面)风险因素与个体伤害发生之间关系的流行病学研究;认识到个体暴露以及至少一个更高层面暴露的研究,其中较低层面的单位或微单位(如个体)嵌套于较高层面的单位或宏单位(如地区或社区)之中;在个体层面检查伤害结局(因变量);以及属于以下类别的核心分析技术:多层次模型、分层模型、随机效应模型、随机系数模型、协方差成分模型、方差成分模型和混合模型。我们将Cochrane有效实践与护理审查小组描述的清单标准与STROBE(加强流行病学观察性研究报告)声明中的因素相结合,并使用其他与伤害相关的系统综述中的几个质量评估项目来创建本综述的质量评估清单。

数据收集与分析

两位作者使用预先格式化的表格,独立为纳入研究提取数据并选择分析特征。他们按照文章中报告的内容提取信息。我们使用传统阈值P < 0.05来确定估计值和效应的统计学显著性。提取信息中的任何差异通过作者之间的讨论以及特别重新阅读和核对相关文章中报告的事实来解决。我们将纳入文章中每个最终多层次模型的结果制成表格,并在正文中总结关键方面。本文的讨论部分报告了对结果的解释以及对整理材料提出的关键问题的识别。

主要结果

通过电子检索我们识别出11967篇文章,经过详细的筛选和选择过程后,仅有14篇被纳入综述。14项研究中的9项在地区和个体层面均识别出显著的固定效应。与儿童伤害率最一致相关的地区层面变量涉及贫困、教育、就业和服务可及性。有一些证据表明,在邻里安全地区层面汇总指标得分较高的地区,伤害率较低。在所用方法以及将测量变量映射到生态因果概念模型方面存在显著差异。

作者结论

这些结果有助于确定伤害预防公共政策方法的范围。更一致地报告多层次研究结果将有助于未来对这些发现的解释和转化。

相似文献

2
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Social Determinants of Health and Injury Among Children.儿童健康与伤害的社会决定因素
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jun 2;8(6):e2513584. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.13584.
5
Tailoring a Child Injury Prevention Program for Low-Income U.S. Families.为美国低收入家庭量身定制儿童伤害预防计划。
Clin Pract Pediatr Psychol. 2022 Sep;10(3):284-294. doi: 10.1037/cpp0000421. Epub 2021 Sep 16.

本文引用的文献

5
The public policy approach to injury prevention.预防伤害的公共政策方法。
Inj Prev. 2011 Feb;17(1):63-5. doi: 10.1136/ip.2010.030619.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验