Takemura Shin-ya, Xu C Shan, Lu Zhiyuan, Rivlin Patricia K, Parag Toufiq, Olbris Donald J, Plaza Stephen, Zhao Ting, Katz William T, Umayam Lowell, Weaver Charlotte, Hess Harald F, Horne Jane Anne, Nunez-Iglesias Juan, Aniceto Roxanne, Chang Lei-Ann, Lauchie Shirley, Nasca Ashley, Ogundeyi Omotara, Sigmund Christopher, Takemura Satoko, Tran Julie, Langille Carlie, Le Lacheur Kelsey, McLin Sari, Shinomiya Aya, Chklovskii Dmitri B, Meinertzhagen Ian A, Scheffer Louis K
Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA 20147;
Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA 20147; Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 4R2;
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Nov 3;112(44):13711-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1509820112. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
We reconstructed the synaptic circuits of seven columns in the second neuropil or medulla behind the fly's compound eye. These neurons embody some of the most stereotyped circuits in one of the most miniaturized of animal brains. The reconstructions allow us, for the first time to our knowledge, to study variations between circuits in the medulla's neighboring columns. This variation in the number of synapses and the types of their synaptic partners has previously been little addressed because methods that visualize multiple circuits have not resolved detailed connections, and existing connectomic studies, which can see such connections, have not so far examined multiple reconstructions of the same circuit. Here, we address the omission by comparing the circuits common to all seven columns to assess variation in their connection strengths and the resultant rates of several different and distinct types of connection error. Error rates reveal that, overall, <1% of contacts are not part of a consensus circuit, and we classify those contacts that supplement (E+) or are missing from it (E-). Autapses, in which the same cell is both presynaptic and postsynaptic at the same synapse, are occasionally seen; two cells in particular, Dm9 and Mi1, form ≥ 20-fold more autapses than do other neurons. These results delimit the accuracy of developmental events that establish and normally maintain synaptic circuits with such precision, and thereby address the operation of such circuits. They also establish a precedent for error rates that will be required in the new science of connectomics.
我们重建了果蝇复眼后方第二个神经纤维层即髓质中七个柱状结构的突触回路。这些神经元体现了动物界最小化大脑之一中一些最具刻板模式的回路。据我们所知,这些重建首次使我们能够研究髓质相邻柱状结构中回路之间的差异。突触数量及其突触伙伴类型的这种差异此前很少被探讨,因为可视化多个回路的方法尚未解析出详细连接,而能够看到此类连接的现有连接组学研究,到目前为止尚未对同一回路的多个重建进行研究。在这里,我们通过比较所有七个柱状结构共有的回路来解决这一疏漏,以评估它们连接强度的差异以及几种不同且独特类型连接错误的发生率。错误率表明,总体而言,不到1%的接触不属于共有回路,我们将那些对共有回路有补充作用(E+)或缺失的接触(E-)进行了分类。偶尔会观察到自突触,即同一细胞在同一位点既是突触前又是突触后的情况;特别是Dm9和Mi1这两个细胞形成的自突触比其他神经元多20倍以上。这些结果界定了精确建立和正常维持突触回路的发育事件的准确性,从而探讨了此类回路的运作。它们还为连接组学这一新兴科学所需的错误率树立了一个先例。