• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国政府任命的检查员对英国动物园动物福利的评估。

The Assessment of Animal Welfare in British Zoos by Government-Appointed Inspectors.

机构信息

Born Free Foundation, 3 Grove House, Foundry Lane, Horsham, West Sussex, RH13 5PL, UK.

School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Woodland Road, Bristol, BS8 1UG, UK.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2012 Sep 28;2(4):507-28. doi: 10.3390/ani2040507.

DOI:10.3390/ani2040507
PMID:26487161
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4494277/
Abstract

We analysed the reports of government-appointed inspectors from 192 zoos between 2005-2008 to provide the first review of how animal welfare was assessed in British zoos since the enactment of the Zoo Licensing Act 1981. We examined the effects of whether or not a veterinarian was included in the inspection team, type of inspection, licence status of the zoo and membership of a zoo association on the inspectors' assessments of animal welfare standards in five areas that approximate to the Five Freedoms. At least 11% of full licence inspections did not comply with the legal requirement for two inspectors. The inspectors' reports were unclear as to how animal welfare was assessed, whether all animals or only a sub-sample had been inspected, and were based predominantly on welfare inputs rather than outcomes. Of 9,024 animal welfare assessments across the 192 zoos, 7,511 (83%) were graded as meeting the standards, 782 (9%) as substandard and the rest were not graded. Of the 192 zoos, 47 (24%) were assessed as meeting all the animal welfare standards. Membership of a zoo association was not associated with a higher overall assessment of animal welfare standards, and specialist collections such as Farm Parks and Other Bird collections performed least well. We recommend a number of changes to the inspection process that should lead to greater clarity in the assessment of animal welfare in British zoos.

摘要

我们分析了 2005-2008 年间政府任命的检查员的报告,首次审查了自 1981 年《动物园许可法》颁布以来英国动物园的动物福利评估情况。我们研究了兽医是否纳入检查小组、检查类型、动物园许可证状况以及动物园协会成员资格对检查员在五个接近“五大自由”的领域评估动物福利标准的影响。至少有 11%的全面许可证检查不符合要求两名检查员的法律规定。检查员的报告不清楚动物福利是如何评估的,是否检查了所有动物或仅检查了部分动物,并且主要基于福利投入而不是结果。在 192 家动物园的 9024 项动物福利评估中,有 7511 项(83%)被评为符合标准,782 项(9%)被评为低于标准,其余未评级。在 192 家动物园中,有 47 家(24%)被评为符合所有动物福利标准。动物园协会的成员资格与动物福利标准的整体评估之间没有关联,而农场公园和其他鸟类收藏等专业收藏的表现最差。我们建议对检查过程进行一些更改,以提高英国动物园动物福利评估的清晰度。

相似文献

1
The Assessment of Animal Welfare in British Zoos by Government-Appointed Inspectors.英国政府任命的检查员对英国动物园动物福利的评估。
Animals (Basel). 2012 Sep 28;2(4):507-28. doi: 10.3390/ani2040507.
2
Do Formal Inspections Ensure that British Zoos Meet and Improve on Minimum Animal Welfare Standards?正式检查能确保英国动物园达到并提升最低动物福利标准吗?
Animals (Basel). 2013 Nov 8;3(4):1058-72. doi: 10.3390/ani3041058.
3
Animal Welfare Assessment in 16 Zoos in South Korea Using the Modified Animal Welfare Assessment Grid.使用改良动物福利评估量表对韩国16家动物园进行动物福利评估
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Apr 26;9:860741. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.860741. eCollection 2022.
4
It's a sign: Animal welfare and zoo type are predictors of animal identification signage usage and quality at zoo exhibits.这是一个信号:动物福利和动物园类型是动物园展品中动物识别标识使用情况和质量的预测因素。
Zoo Biol. 2023 Mar;42(2):283-295. doi: 10.1002/zoo.21734. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
5
Using Zoo Welfare Assessments to Identify Common Issues in Developing Country Zoos.利用动物园福利评估来识别发展中国家动物园的常见问题。
Animals (Basel). 2020 Nov 12;10(11):2101. doi: 10.3390/ani10112101.
6
An Animal Welfare Risk Assessment Process for Zoos.动物园动物福利风险评估流程
Animals (Basel). 2018 Jul 28;8(8):130. doi: 10.3390/ani8080130.
7
Unraveling the complexity of the zoo community: identifying the variables related to conservation performance in zoological parks.解读动物园群落的复杂性:识别与动物园保护成效相关的变量。
Zoo Biol. 2012 Jan-Feb;31(1):55-70. doi: 10.1002/zoo.20386. Epub 2011 Apr 7.
8
Animal welfare official inspections: farmers and inspectors shared concerns.动物福利官方检查:养殖户和检查人员共同关注。
Animal. 2021 Jan;15(1):100038. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2020.100038. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
9
Welfare evaluations of nonhuman animals in selected zoos in the Philippines.菲律宾部分动物园中非人类动物的福利评估。
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2005;8(1):59-68. doi: 10.1207/s15327604jaws0801_5.
10
Adaptation of the animal welfare assessment grid (AWAG) for monitoring animal welfare in zoological collections.动物福利评估网格(AWAG)在动物园动物福利监测中的应用。
Vet Rec. 2017 Aug 5;181(6):143. doi: 10.1136/vr.104309. Epub 2017 May 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Animal Welfare Assessment in 16 Zoos in South Korea Using the Modified Animal Welfare Assessment Grid.使用改良动物福利评估量表对韩国16家动物园进行动物福利评估
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Apr 26;9:860741. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.860741. eCollection 2022.
2
Longitudinal Improvements in Zoo-Housed Elephant Welfare: A Case Study at ZSL Whipsnade Zoo.圈养大象福利的纵向改善:以伦敦动物学会惠普斯奈德动物园为例
Animals (Basel). 2020 Nov 4;10(11):2029. doi: 10.3390/ani10112029.
3
A Review of Welfare Assessment Methods in Reptiles, and Preliminary Application of the Welfare Quality Protocol to the Pygmy Blue-Tongue Skink, , Using Animal-Based Measures.爬行动物福利评估方法综述,以及福利质量协议在侏儒蓝舌石龙子中的初步应用:基于动物指标的研究
Animals (Basel). 2019 Jan 17;9(1):27. doi: 10.3390/ani9010027.
4
The Science of Animal Behavior and Welfare: Challenges, Opportunities, and Global Perspective.动物行为与福利科学:挑战、机遇与全球视角
Front Vet Sci. 2015 May 28;2:16. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2015.00016. eCollection 2015.
5
Do Formal Inspections Ensure that British Zoos Meet and Improve on Minimum Animal Welfare Standards?正式检查能确保英国动物园达到并提升最低动物福利标准吗?
Animals (Basel). 2013 Nov 8;3(4):1058-72. doi: 10.3390/ani3041058.

本文引用的文献

1
Aggregation of measures to produce an overall assessment of animal welfare. Part 2: analysis of constraints.汇总各项措施以对动物福利进行全面评估。第二部分:限制因素分析。
Animal. 2007 Sep;1(8):1188-97. doi: 10.1017/S1751731107000547.
2
Aggregation of measures to produce an overall assessment of animal welfare. Part 1: a review of existing methods.汇总措施以对动物福利进行全面评估。第 1 部分:现有方法综述。
Animal. 2007 Sep;1(8):1179-87. doi: 10.1017/S1751731107000535.
3
Species differences in responses to captivity: stress, welfare and the comparative method.物种对圈养的反应差异:应激、福利和比较方法。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2010 Dec;25(12):713-21. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2010.08.011. Epub 2010 Oct 16.
4
Introduction to the special issue on zoo animal welfare.动物园动物福利特刊引言。
Zoo Biol. 2009 Nov;28(6):501-6. doi: 10.1002/zoo.20287.
5
There are big gaps in our knowledge, and thus approach, to zoo animal welfare: a case for evidence-based zoo animal management.我们在动物园动物福利的认知以及相应方法上存在巨大差距:这表明需要基于证据的动物园动物管理。
Zoo Biol. 2009 Nov;28(6):574-88. doi: 10.1002/zoo.20288.
6
Animal-based welfare monitoring: using keeper ratings as an assessment tool.基于动物的福利监测:使用饲养员评分作为评估工具。
Zoo Biol. 2009 Nov;28(6):545-60. doi: 10.1002/zoo.20281.
7
Programmatic approaches to assessing and improving animal welfare in zoos and aquariums.评估和改善动物园及水族馆动物福利的系统性方法。
Zoo Biol. 2009 Nov;28(6):519-30. doi: 10.1002/zoo.20260.
8
Assessment of positive welfare: a review.积极福利评估:综述
Vet J. 2008 Mar;175(3):293-300. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.05.009. Epub 2007 Jul 5.
9
Visitors' effects on the welfare of animals in the zoo: a review.游客对动物园动物福利的影响:综述
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2007;10(2):169-83. doi: 10.1080/10888700701313595.
10
Animal welfare: captivity effects on wide-ranging carnivores.动物福利:圈养对大型食肉动物的影响。
Nature. 2003 Oct 2;425(6957):473-4. doi: 10.1038/425473a.