Uhlmann R F, Rees T S, Psaty B M, Duckert L G
Department of Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle 98104.
J Gen Intern Med. 1989 Mar-Apr;4(2):90-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02602346.
The validity and reliability of auditory screening tests were evaluated in 34 demented and 31 non-demented elderly outpatients. In reference to an audiometric gold standard (40-dB HL hearing loss in speech frequencies), 512-Hz and 1024-Hz tuning forks, finger rub, and whispered voice tests performed well (ROC curve areas = 0.82 to 0.94). Simultaneously high (greater than 0.80) sensitivities and specificities were achievable for all these tests in demented patients. In non-demented patients, however, only the whispered voice test achieved simultaneously high specificity and sensitivity. The most accurate rule for air conduction screening audiometry was the inability to hear greater than or equal to two of four 40-dB HL speech frequencies (sensitivity = 1.0, specificity = 0.75 in non-demented patients; sensitivity = 0.97, specificity = 0.74 in demented patients). Interobserver/test-retest reliability was generally high for tuning forks, finger rub, and whispered voice tests (range of intraclass correlation coefficients = 0.38 to 0.90), and was somewhat higher in demented than in non-demented patients. These results suggest that some of the simple, traditional methods of auditory screening may have considerable validity and reliability in demented and non-demented older adults.
