Nakano Kaoru, Ishii Naoki, Ikeya Takashi, Ego Mai, Shimamura Yuto, Takagi Koichi, Nakamura Kenji, Fukuda Katsuyuki, Fujita Yoshiyuki
Department of Gastroenterology, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Endosc Int Open. 2015 Oct;3(5):E529-33. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1392510. Epub 2015 Aug 11.
Long-term outcomes of endoscopic band ligation (EBL) for colonic diverticular hemorrhage have not been reported to date. The aim of this study was to determine the long-term outcomes of EBL and to retrospectively compare them with those of endoscopic clipping (EC) in the treatment of colonic diverticular hemorrhage.
The study included patients with colonic diverticular hemorrhage who were treated with EBL or EC from January 2004 to November 2014 and followed up more than 1 year (61 patients in the EBL group and 39 patients in the EC group). Time-to-event analysis of rebleeding was performed with the Kaplan-Meier method. A follow-up colonoscopy was performed to confirm the disappearance of the banded diverticula in the EBL group.
Rebleeding occurred in 21 patients in the EBL group and in 26 patients in the EC group. The cumulative incidence of rebleeding at 1, 12, 24, and 36 months after first treatments was 14 %, 23 %, 26 %, and 41 % in the EBL group and 38 %, 49 %, 59 %, and 68 % in the EC group, respectively. Time-to-event analysis revealed statistically significant data (Log-rank test, P = 0.0036). Scar formation with fold convergence at the previously banded site was observed in 11 of 24 patients who underwent follow-up colonoscopy (46 %). However, late rebleeding (rebleeding more than 30 days after EBL) occurred in five of these 11 cases.
EBL was superior to EC in the treatment of colonic diverticular hemorrhage. However, the risk of rebleeding was not avoided even after the diverticula had been resolved using EBL.
迄今为止,尚未有关于内镜下套扎术(EBL)治疗结肠憩室出血的长期疗效报道。本研究旨在确定EBL的长期疗效,并回顾性地将其与内镜下钳夹术(EC)治疗结肠憩室出血的疗效进行比较。
本研究纳入了2004年1月至2014年11月期间接受EBL或EC治疗且随访时间超过1年的结肠憩室出血患者(EBL组61例,EC组39例)。采用Kaplan-Meier法对再出血进行事件发生时间分析。对EBL组患者进行随访结肠镜检查,以确认套扎憩室是否消失。
EBL组有21例患者发生再出血,EC组有26例患者发生再出血。首次治疗后1、12、24和36个月时,EBL组再出血的累积发生率分别为14%、23%、26%和41%,EC组分别为38%、49%、59%和68%。事件发生时间分析显示差异具有统计学意义(对数秩检验,P = 0.0036)。在24例接受随访结肠镜检查的患者中,有11例(46%)在先前套扎部位观察到瘢痕形成且皱襞融合。然而,在这11例患者中有5例发生了迟发性再出血(EBL后30天以上再出血)。
在治疗结肠憩室出血方面,EBL优于EC。然而,即使使用EBL使憩室消失后,再出血风险仍未避免。