• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Protocol for the End-of-Life Social Action Study (ELSA): a randomised wait-list controlled trial and embedded qualitative case study evaluation assessing the causal impact of social action befriending services on end of life experience.临终社会行动研究(ELSA)方案:一项随机等待名单对照试验及嵌入式定性案例研究评估,旨在评估社会行动交友服务对临终体验的因果影响。
BMC Palliat Care. 2016 Jul 13;15:60. doi: 10.1186/s12904-016-0134-3.
2
How effective are volunteers at supporting people in their last year of life? A pragmatic randomised wait-list trial in palliative care (ELSA).志愿者在帮助处于生命最后一年的人方面效果如何?一项姑息治疗中的实用随机等待名单试验(ELSA)。
BMC Med. 2016 Dec 9;14(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0746-8.
3
'Being with' or 'doing for'? How the role of an end-of-life volunteer befriender can impact patient wellbeing: interviews from a multiple qualitative case study (ELSA).“陪伴”还是“做事”?终末期志愿者陪伴者的角色如何影响患者的幸福感:来自一项多案例定性研究(ELSA)的访谈。
Support Care Cancer. 2018 Sep;26(9):3163-3172. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4169-2. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
4
INSPIRE (INvestigating Social and PractIcal suppoRts at the End of life): Pilot randomised trial of a community social and practical support intervention for adults with life-limiting illness.激励(临终时社会与实际支持调查):针对患有生命受限疾病的成年人的社区社会与实际支持干预的试点随机试验
BMC Palliat Care. 2015 Nov 24;14:65. doi: 10.1186/s12904-015-0060-9.
5
Erratum to: Protocol for the End-of-Life Social Action Study (ELSA): a randomised wait-list controlled trial and embedded qualitative case study evaluation assessing the causal impact of social action befriending services on end of life experience.
BMC Palliat Care. 2016 Dec 29;15(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12904-016-0170-z.
6
A novel Family Dignity Intervention (FDI) for enhancing and informing holistic palliative care in Asia: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.一种用于加强和指导亚洲整体姑息治疗的新型家庭尊严干预措施(FDI):一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2017 Dec 4;18(1):587. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2325-5.
7
BEFRIENding for Depression, Anxiety and Social support in older adults living in Australian residential aged care facilities (BEFRIENDAS): randomised controlled trial protocol.老年人友好促进抑郁、焦虑和社会支持计划(BEFRIENDAS):一项在澳大利亚养老院中开展的随机对照试验方案。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 May 12;21(1):305. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02233-7.
8
Effectiveness of one-to-one volunteer support for patients with psychosis: protocol of a randomised controlled trial.一对一志愿者支持对精神病患者的效果:一项随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2016 Aug 3;6(8):e011582. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011582.
9
Supporting family caregivers to identify their own needs in end-of-life care: Qualitative findings from a stepped wedge cluster trial.支持家庭护理人员确定其在临终关怀中的自身需求:一项阶梯式楔形整群试验的定性研究结果
Palliat Med. 2015 Jun;29(6):508-17. doi: 10.1177/0269216314566061. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
10
Resiliency Engagement and Care in Health (REaCH): a telephone befriending intervention for upskilled rural youth in the context of COVID-19 pandemic-study protocol for a multi-centre cluster randomised controlled trial.韧性融入与关怀健康项目(REaCH):一项在 COVID-19 大流行背景下针对农村青年技能提升者的电话陪伴干预措施——一项多中心集群随机对照试验研究方案。
Trials. 2021 Jul 28;22(1):500. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05465-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Caring toward end of life through acute hospital and community partnerships: A scoping review.通过急症医院与社区合作实现临终关怀:一项范围综述
Palliat Med. 2025 Mar;39(3):346-357. doi: 10.1177/02692163241310692. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
2
Researching two Compassionate Cities: study protocol for a mixed-methods process and outcome evaluation.研究两座关爱之城:一项混合方法的过程与结果评估研究方案。
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2022 Nov 26;16:26323524221137601. doi: 10.1177/26323524221137601. eCollection 2022.
3
A mixed-method evaluation of a volunteer navigation intervention for older persons living with chronic illness (Nav-CARE): findings from a knowledge translation study.一项针对慢性病老年患者志愿者导航干预措施(Nav-CARE)的混合方法评价:一项知识转化研究的结果。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Oct 15;19(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00666-2.
4
Implementation Models of Compassionate Communities and Compassionate Cities at the End of Life: A Systematic Review.生命末期的慈悲社区和慈悲城市实施模式:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 28;17(17):6271. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176271.
5
Trained volunteers to support chronically ill, multimorbid elderly between hospital and domesticity - a systematic review of one-on-one-intervention types, effects, and underlying training concepts.培训志愿者在医院和家庭之间为患有慢性病和多种疾病的老年患者提供支持 - 对一对一干预类型、效果和潜在培训概念的系统评价。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 May 2;19(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1130-2.
6
'Being with' or 'doing for'? How the role of an end-of-life volunteer befriender can impact patient wellbeing: interviews from a multiple qualitative case study (ELSA).“陪伴”还是“做事”?终末期志愿者陪伴者的角色如何影响患者的幸福感:来自一项多案例定性研究(ELSA)的访谈。
Support Care Cancer. 2018 Sep;26(9):3163-3172. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4169-2. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
7
Volunteer navigation partnerships: Piloting a compassionate community approach to early palliative care.志愿者导航伙伴关系:探索早期姑息治疗的富有同情心的社区方法。
BMC Palliat Care. 2017 Jul 3;17(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12904-017-0210-3.
8
Erratum to: Protocol for the End-of-Life Social Action Study (ELSA): a randomised wait-list controlled trial and embedded qualitative case study evaluation assessing the causal impact of social action befriending services on end of life experience.
BMC Palliat Care. 2016 Dec 29;15(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12904-016-0170-z.
9
How effective are volunteers at supporting people in their last year of life? A pragmatic randomised wait-list trial in palliative care (ELSA).志愿者在帮助处于生命最后一年的人方面效果如何?一项姑息治疗中的实用随机等待名单试验(ELSA)。
BMC Med. 2016 Dec 9;14(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0746-8.

本文引用的文献

1
The clinical and cost effectiveness of a Breathlessness Intervention Service for patients with advanced non-malignant disease and their informal carers: mixed findings of a mixed method randomised controlled trial.针对晚期非恶性疾病患者及其非正式照护者的呼吸急促干预服务的临床和成本效益:一项混合方法随机对照试验的混合结果。
Trials. 2016 Apr 4;17:185. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1304-6.
2
Is dying in hospital better than home in incurable cancer and what factors influence this? A population-based study.在患有无法治愈的癌症时,在医院死亡比在家中死亡更好吗?哪些因素会对此产生影响?一项基于人群的研究。
BMC Med. 2015 Oct 9;13:235. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0466-5.
3
Is a specialist breathlessness service more effective and cost-effective for patients with advanced cancer and their carers than standard care? Findings of a mixed-method randomised controlled trial.对于晚期癌症患者及其护理人员而言,专科呼吸困难服务是否比标准护理更有效且更具成本效益?一项混合方法随机对照试验的结果。
BMC Med. 2014 Oct 31;12:194. doi: 10.1186/s12916-014-0194-2.
4
Does involving volunteers in the provision of palliative care make a difference to patient and family wellbeing? A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative evidence.让志愿者参与提供姑息治疗对患者和家属的幸福感有影响吗?定量和定性证据的系统评价。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2015 Mar;52(3):756-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.08.007. Epub 2014 Aug 23.
5
Hospice palliative care volunteers: the benefits for patients, family caregivers, and the volunteers.临终关怀志愿者:对患者、家庭护理人员及志愿者的益处
Palliat Support Care. 2015 Jun;13(3):809-13. doi: 10.1017/S1478951514000674. Epub 2014 Jun 5.
6
Volunteers in Palliative Care - A Comparison of Seven European Countries: A Descriptive Study.姑息治疗志愿者——七个欧洲国家的比较:一项描述性研究
Pain Pract. 2015 Jul;15(6):572-9. doi: 10.1111/papr.12209. Epub 2014 Apr 28.
7
Understanding the role of the volunteer in specialist palliative care: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.理解志愿者在专科姑息治疗中的作用:定性研究的系统评价和主题综合。
BMC Palliat Care. 2014 Feb 10;13(1):3. doi: 10.1186/1472-684X-13-3.
8
Volunteers in specialist palliative care: a survey of adult services in the United Kingdom.志愿者在专科姑息治疗中的作用:英国成人服务调查。
J Palliat Med. 2014 May;17(5):568-74. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2013.0157. Epub 2014 Jan 29.
9
Dying at home--is it better: a narrative appraisal of the state of the science.在家中离世——是否更好:对科学现状的叙述性评估。
Palliat Med. 2013 Dec;27(10):918-24. doi: 10.1177/0269216313487940. Epub 2013 May 22.
10
Recommendations for managing missing data, attrition and response shift in palliative and end-of-life care research: part of the MORECare research method guidance on statistical issues.在姑息治疗和临终关怀研究中管理缺失数据、损耗和反应转移的建议:MORECare 研究方法关于统计问题指南的一部分。
Palliat Med. 2013 Dec;27(10):899-907. doi: 10.1177/0269216313486952. Epub 2013 May 7.

临终社会行动研究(ELSA)方案:一项随机等待名单对照试验及嵌入式定性案例研究评估,旨在评估社会行动交友服务对临终体验的因果影响。

Protocol for the End-of-Life Social Action Study (ELSA): a randomised wait-list controlled trial and embedded qualitative case study evaluation assessing the causal impact of social action befriending services on end of life experience.

作者信息

Walshe Catherine, Algorta Guillermo Perez, Dodd Steven, Hill Matthew, Ockenden Nick, Payne Sheila, Preston Nancy

机构信息

International Observatory on End of Life Care, Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Bailrigg, Lancaster, LA1 4YW, UK.

Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Bailrigg, Lancaster, LA1 4YW, UK.

出版信息

BMC Palliat Care. 2016 Jul 13;15:60. doi: 10.1186/s12904-016-0134-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12904-016-0134-3
PMID:27412459
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4944471/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Compassionate support at the end of life should not be the responsibility of health and social care professionals alone and requires a response from the wider community. Volunteers, as community members, are a critical part of many end-of-life care services. The impact of their services on important outcomes such as quality of life is currently poorly understood. The purpose of this study is to evaluate a series of social action initiatives which use volunteers to deliver befriending services to people anticipated to be in their last year of life. The aim is to determine if receiving care from a social action volunteer befriending service plus usual care significantly improves quality of life in the last year of life.

METHODS/DESIGN: The research questions will be addressed through a wait-list randomised controlled trial (WLRCT) and qualitative case study evaluation across 12 sites in England. Participants will be randomly allocated to either receive the social action volunteer befriending service straight away or receive the intervention after a four week wait (wait-list arm). The impact of the intervention on end-of-life experience (quality of life as primary outcome, loneliness, social support) will be measured. Repeated assessments will be carried out at baseline and weeks 4 and 8 for the intervention arm and weeks 4, 8 and 12 for the wait-list arm. For selected sites case study evaluation will include interviews, observation and documentary analysis to understand the mechanisms underpinning any found impact.

DISCUSSION

This study will address the need to both provide services which use social action models to support end-of-life care in community settings, and to robustly evaluate these models to determine if they influence the experience of end-of-life care. Such services could work to reduce isolation, help meet emotional needs and maintain a sense of connectedness to the community. ISRCTN 12929812 Registered 20.5.15.

摘要

背景

临终关怀不应仅是健康和社会护理专业人员的责任,还需要更广泛的社区做出回应。志愿者作为社区成员,是许多临终关怀服务的关键组成部分。目前人们对他们的服务对生活质量等重要结果的影响了解甚少。本研究的目的是评估一系列社会行动倡议,这些倡议利用志愿者为预计处于生命最后一年的人提供陪伴服务。目的是确定接受社会行动志愿者陪伴服务加常规护理是否能显著提高生命最后一年的生活质量。

方法/设计:研究问题将通过等待名单随机对照试验(WLRCT)以及对英格兰12个地点的定性案例研究评估来解决。参与者将被随机分配,要么立即接受社会行动志愿者陪伴服务,要么在等待四周后接受干预(等待名单组)。将测量干预对临终体验(以生活质量为主要结果、孤独感、社会支持)的影响。干预组将在基线、第4周和第8周进行重复评估,等待名单组将在第4周、第8周和第12周进行重复评估。对于选定的地点,案例研究评估将包括访谈、观察和文献分析,以了解任何已发现影响背后的机制。

讨论

本研究将满足以下两方面需求,一是提供利用社会行动模式支持社区临终关怀的服务,二是对这些模式进行严格评估,以确定它们是否会影响临终关怀体验。此类服务有助于减少孤立感,满足情感需求,并维持与社区的联系感。国际标准随机对照试验编号12929812,于2015年5月20日注册。