Yarber Laura, Brownson Carol A, Jacob Rebekah R, Baker Elizabeth A, Jones Ellen, Baumann Carsten, Deshpande Anjali D, Gillespie Kathleen N, Scharff Darcell P, Brownson Ross C
College for Public Health & Social Justice, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Prevention Research Center in St. Louis, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Dec 12;15:547. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1224-2.
Evidence-based public health gives public health practitioners the tools they need to make choices based on the best and most current evidence. An evidence-based public health training course developed in 1997 by the Prevention Research Center in St. Louis has been taught by a transdisciplinary team multiple times with positive results. In order to scale up evidence-based practices, a train-the-trainer initiative was launched in 2010.
This study examines the outcomes achieved among participants of courses led by trained state-level faculty. Participants from trainee-led courses in four states (Indiana, Colorado, Nebraska, and Kansas) over three years were asked to complete an online survey. Attempts were made to contact 317 past participants. One-hundred forty-four (50.9 %) reachable participants were included in analysis. Outcomes measured include frequency of use of materials, resources, and other skills or tools from the course; reasons for not using the materials and resources; and benefits from attending the course. Survey responses were tabulated and compared using Chi-square tests.
Among the most commonly reported benefits, 88 % of respondents agreed that they acquired knowledge about a new subject, 85 % saw applications for the knowledge to their work, and 78 % agreed the course also improved abilities to make scientifically informed decisions at work. The most commonly reported reasons for not using course content as much as intended included not having enough time to implement evidence-based approaches (42 %); other staff/peers lack training (34 %); and not enough funding for continued training (34 %). The study findings suggest that utilization of course materials and teachings remains relatively high across practitioner groups, whether they were taught by the original trainers or by state-based trainers.
The findings of this study suggest that train-the-trainer is an effective method for broadly disseminating evidence-based public health principles. Train-the-trainer is less costly than the traditional method and allows for courses to be tailored to local issues, thus making it a viable approach to dissemination and scale up of new public health practices.
循证公共卫生为公共卫生从业者提供了所需工具,使其能够依据最佳和最新证据做出选择。圣路易斯预防研究中心于1997年开发的一门循证公共卫生培训课程,由一个跨学科团队多次授课,取得了积极成果。为了扩大循证实践的规模,2010年发起了一项培训培训师的倡议。
本研究考察了由受过培训的州级教员授课的课程参与者所取得的成果。三年内来自四个州(印第安纳州、科罗拉多州、内布拉斯加州和堪萨斯州)由学员授课的课程的参与者被要求完成一项在线调查。试图联系317名过去的参与者。144名(50.9%)能够联系上的参与者被纳入分析。所测量的成果包括课程材料、资源以及其他技能或工具的使用频率;不使用这些材料和资源的原因;以及参加课程的益处。调查回复被制成表格,并使用卡方检验进行比较。
在最常报告的益处中,88%的受访者同意他们获得了关于一个新主题的知识,85%的人看到了该知识在其工作中的应用,78%的人同意该课程还提高了他们在工作中做出基于科学依据的决策的能力。最常报告的未按预期充分使用课程内容的原因包括没有足够时间实施循证方法(42%);其他工作人员/同行缺乏培训(34%);以及没有足够资金用于持续培训(34%)。研究结果表明,无论课程是由最初的培训师还是由州级培训师授课,从业者群体对课程材料和教学内容的利用率仍然相对较高。
本研究结果表明,培训培训师是广泛传播循证公共卫生原则的一种有效方法。培训培训师比传统方法成本更低,并且能够使课程针对当地问题进行调整,因此使其成为传播和扩大新公共卫生实践的一种可行方法。