Vaschetto Rosanna, Frigerio Pamela, Sommariva Maurizio, Boggero Arianna, Rondi Valentina, Grossi Francesca, Cavuto Silvio, Nava Stefano, Corte Francesco Della, Navalesi Paolo
Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Maggiore della Carità Hospital, Corso Mazzini 18, 28100, Novara, Italy.
Dipartimento di Neuroscienze, Azienda Ospedaliera Niguarda Ca' Granda, Piazza Dell'Ospedale Maggiore 3, 20162, Milano, Italy.
Ann Intensive Care. 2015 Dec;5(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s13613-015-0098-0. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
While a systematic approach to weaning reduces the rate of extubation failure in intubated brain-injured patients, no data are available on the weaning outcome of these patients after tracheotomy. We aimed to assess whether a systematic approach to disconnect tracheotomized neurological and neurosurgical patients off the ventilator (intervention) is superior to the sole physician's judgment (control). Based on previous work in intubated patients, we hypothesized a reduction of the rate of failure within 48 h from 15 to 5 %. Secondary endpoints were duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU length of stay and mortality.
We designed a single center randomized controlled study. Since no data are available on tracheotomized patients, we based our a priori power analysis on results derived from intubated patients and calculated an overall sample size of 280 patients.
After inclusion of 168 consecutive patients, the trial was interrupted because the attending physicians judged the observed rate of reconnection to be much greater than expected. The overall rate of failure was 29 %, confirming the physicians' judgment. Twenty-one patients (24 %) in the intervention group and 27 (33 %) controls were reconnected to the ventilator within 48 h (p = 0.222). The main reasons for failure were respiratory distress (80 and 88 % in the treatment and control group, respectively), hemodynamic impairment (15 and 4 % in the treatment and control group, respectively), neurological deterioration (4 % in the control group only). The duration of mechanical ventilation was of 412 ± 202 h and 402 ± 189 h, in the control and intervention group, respectively. ICU length of stay was on average of 23 days for both groups. ICU mortality was 6 % in the control and 2 % in the intervention group without significant differences.
We found no difference between the two groups under evaluation, with a rate of failure much higher than expected. Consequent to the early interruption, our study results to be underpowered. Based on the results of the present study, a further trial should overall enroll 790 patients.
ACTRN12612000372886.
虽然采用系统的撤机方法可降低插管脑损伤患者的拔管失败率,但关于这些患者气管切开术后的撤机结果尚无数据。我们旨在评估对气管切开的神经科和神经外科患者进行系统的脱机方法(干预)是否优于单纯医生的判断(对照)。基于之前对插管患者的研究,我们假设48小时内失败率从15%降至5%。次要终点为机械通气时间、重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间和死亡率。
我们设计了一项单中心随机对照研究。由于尚无气管切开患者的数据,我们根据插管患者的结果进行了先验功效分析,并计算出总样本量为280例患者。
纳入168例连续患者后,试验中断,因为主治医生判断观察到的重新连接率远高于预期。总体失败率为29%,证实了医生的判断。干预组21例患者(24%)和对照组27例患者(33%)在48小时内重新连接呼吸机(p = 0.222)。失败的主要原因是呼吸窘迫(治疗组和对照组分别为80%和88%)、血流动力学损害(治疗组和对照组分别为15%和4%)、神经功能恶化(仅对照组为4%)。对照组和干预组的机械通气时间分别为412±202小时和402±189小时。两组的ICU平均住院时间均为23天。ICU死亡率在对照组为6%,在干预组为2%,无显著差异。
我们发现评估的两组之间无差异,失败率远高于预期。由于早期中断,我们的研究结果效力不足。根据本研究结果,进一步的试验总体应纳入790例患者。
ACTRN12612000372886。