Ament Stephanie M C, de Groot Jeanny J A, Maessen José M C, Dirksen Carmen D, van der Weijden Trudy, Kleijnen Jos
Department of Family Medicine, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands School for Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW), Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Department of Family Medicine, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
BMJ Open. 2015 Dec 29;5(12):e008073. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008073.
To evaluate (1) the state of the art in sustainability research and (2) the outcomes of professionals' adherence to guideline recommendations in medical practice.
Systematic review.
Searches were conducted until August 2015 in MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and the Guidelines International Network (GIN) library. A snowball strategy, in which reference sections of other reviews and of included papers were searched, was used to identify additional papers.
Studies needed to be focused on sustainability and on professionals' adherence to clinical practice guidelines in medical care. Studies had to include at least 2 measurements: 1 before (PRE) or immediately after implementation (EARLY POST) and 1 measurement longer than 1 year after active implementation (LATE POST).
The search retrieved 4219 items, of which 14 studies met the inclusion criteria, involving 18 sustainability evaluations. The mean timeframe between the end of active implementation and the sustainability evaluation was 2.6 years (minimum 1.5-maximum 7.0). The studies were heterogeneous with respect to their methodology. Sustainability was considered to be successful if performance in terms of professionals' adherence was fully maintained in the late postimplementation phase. Long-term sustainability of professionals' adherence was reported in 7 out of 18 evaluations, adherence was not sustained in 6 evaluations, 4 evaluations showed mixed sustainability results and in 1 evaluation it was unclear whether the professional adherence was sustained.
(2) Professionals' adherence to a clinical practice guideline in medical care decreased after more than 1 year after implementation in about half of the cases. (1) Owing to the limited number of studies, the absence of a uniform definition, the high risk of bias, and the mixed results of studies, no firm conclusion about the sustainability of professionals' adherence to guidelines in medical practice can be drawn.
评估(1)可持续性研究的现状,以及(2)医疗实践中专业人员遵循指南建议的结果。
系统评价。
截至2015年8月,在MEDLINE、CINAHL、EMBASE、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)和指南国际网络(GIN)图书馆进行检索。采用滚雪球策略,检索其他综述和纳入论文的参考文献部分,以识别更多论文。
研究需聚焦于可持续性以及医疗保健中专业人员对临床实践指南的遵循情况。研究必须包括至少2次测量:1次在实施前(PRE)或实施后立即进行(早期POST),以及1次在积极实施后1年以上进行的测量(晚期POST)。
检索到4219篇文献,其中14项研究符合纳入标准,涉及18项可持续性评估。积极实施结束至可持续性评估的平均时间为2.6年(最短1.5年 - 最长7.0年)。这些研究在方法上存在异质性。如果在实施后期专业人员遵循方面的表现得到充分维持,则认为可持续性是成功的。18项评估中有7项报告了专业人员遵循情况的长期可持续性,6项评估中遵循情况未得到维持,4项评估显示可持续性结果不一,1项评估中不清楚专业人员的遵循情况是否得到维持。
(2)在实施1年以上后,约一半的情况下,医疗保健中专业人员对临床实践指南的遵循情况有所下降。(1)由于研究数量有限、缺乏统一的定义、存在较高的偏倚风险以及研究结果不一,无法就医疗实践中专业人员遵循指南的可持续性得出确凿结论。