Bliemel C, Sielski R, Doering B, Dodel R, Balzer-Geldsetzer M, Ruchholtz S, Buecking B
Center for Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35043, Marburg, Germany.
Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Philipps-University, Marburg, Germany.
Osteoporos Int. 2016 Jun;27(6):1979-87. doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3472-8. Epub 2016 Jan 5.
Hip fractures are common in elderly people. Despite great progress in surgical care, the outcome of patients with hip fracture remains disappointing. This study determined four prognostic factors (lower ASA score, higher pre-fracture EQ-5D index, higher MMSE score, and female gender) to predict 1-year survival in patients with hip fracture.
This study determined the prognostic factors for 1-year survival in patients with hip fracture. Based on these predictors, a scoring system was developed for use upon patients' admission to the hospital.
Hip fracture patients, aged ≥60 years, were prospectively enrolled. Upon admission, patients' sociodemographic data, type of fracture, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, health-related quality of life scores (EQ-5D index) and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores were recorded, among other parameters. Correlational analysis was performed on all potential variables to identify relevant predictor variables of 1-year survival. Univariate regression analysis was performed on all selected variables, followed by a multivariate analysis for variables that were significant in the univariate analysis. The final score was developed by converting the β-coefficients of each variable from the multivariate analysis into a scoring system.
For 391 hip fracture patients, complete data were available at the time of the 1-year follow-up. In multivariate regression analysis, independent predictors of 1-year survival were lower ASA score, higher pre-fracture EQ-5D index, higher MMSE score, and female gender. The different variables were weighted according to their β-coefficient to build the prognostic score, which ranged from 0 to 10 points. The ROC curve for 1-year mortality after hip fracture showed an area under the curve of 0.74 (R (2) = 0.272; 95 % CI 0.68-0.79; p < 0.001).
With only four instruments, the new score represents a useful tool for estimating 1-year survival in elderly patients with hip fractures. At present, the score is limited due to a lack of validation. A validation study is currently underway to prove its reliability.
髋部骨折在老年人中很常见。尽管外科治疗取得了很大进展,但髋部骨折患者的预后仍然令人失望。本研究确定了四个预后因素(较低的美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分、较高的骨折前EQ-5D指数、较高的简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)评分和女性性别)来预测髋部骨折患者的1年生存率。
本研究确定了髋部骨折患者1年生存的预后因素。基于这些预测因素,开发了一种评分系统,用于患者入院时。
前瞻性纳入年龄≥60岁的髋部骨折患者。入院时,记录患者的社会人口统计学数据、骨折类型、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分、健康相关生活质量评分(EQ-5D指数)和简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)评分等参数。对所有潜在变量进行相关性分析,以确定1年生存的相关预测变量。对所有选定变量进行单因素回归分析,然后对单因素分析中有意义的变量进行多因素分析。通过将多因素分析中每个变量的β系数转换为评分系统来制定最终评分。
对于391例髋部骨折患者,在1年随访时可获得完整数据。在多因素回归分析中,1年生存的独立预测因素是较低的ASA评分、较高的骨折前EQ-5D指数、较高的MMSE评分和女性性别。根据不同变量的β系数进行加权,构建预后评分,范围为0至10分。髋部骨折后1年死亡率的ROC曲线显示曲线下面积为0.74(R(2)=0.272;95%CI 0.68 - 0.79;p<0.001)。
仅用四个指标,新评分是评估老年髋部骨折患者1年生存率的有用工具。目前,由于缺乏验证,该评分存在局限性。目前正在进行一项验证研究以证明其可靠性。