Suppr超能文献

各种物理非手术治疗方式对膝关节骨关节炎疼痛的影响。

The effects of various physical non-operative modalities on the pain in osteoarthritis of the knee.

作者信息

Cherian J J, Jauregui J J, Leichliter A K, Elmallah R K, Bhave A, Mont M A

机构信息

Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, 2401 W. Belvedere Ave, Baltimore, Maryland, 21215, USA.

Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, 4170 City Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19131, USA.

出版信息

Bone Joint J. 2016 Jan;98-B(1 Suppl A):89-94. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B1.36353.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of various non-operative modalities of treatment (transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS); neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES); insoles and bracing) on the pain of osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. We conducted a systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to identify the therapeutic options which are commonly adopted for the management of osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. The outcome measurement tools used in the different studies were the visual analogue scale and The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index pain index: all pain scores were converted to a 100-point scale. A total of 30 studies met our inclusion criteria: 13 on insoles, seven on TENS, six on NMES, and four on bracing. The standardised mean difference (SMD) in pain after treatment with TENS was 1.796, which represented a significant reduction in pain. The significant overall effect estimate for NMES on pain was similar to that of TENS, with a SMD of 1.924. The overall effect estimate of insoles on pain was a SMD of 0.992. The overall effect of bracing showed a significant reduction in pain of 1.34. Overall, all four non-operative modalities of treatment were found to have a significant effect on the reduction of pain in OA of the knee. This study shows that non-operative physical modalities of treatment are of benefit when treating OA of the knee. However, much of the literature reviewed evaluates studies with follow-up of less than six months: future work should aim to evaluate patients with longer follow-up.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估各种非手术治疗方式(经皮电刺激神经疗法(TENS);神经肌肉电刺激(NMES);鞋垫和支具)对膝关节骨关节炎(OA)疼痛的影响。我们根据系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目指南进行了一项系统评价,以确定膝关节骨关节炎(OA)管理中常用的治疗选择。不同研究中使用的结果测量工具是视觉模拟量表和西安大略和麦克马斯特大学关节炎指数疼痛指数:所有疼痛评分均转换为100分制。共有30项研究符合我们的纳入标准:13项关于鞋垫,7项关于TENS,6项关于NMES,4项关于支具。TENS治疗后疼痛的标准化平均差(SMD)为1.796,这表明疼痛显著减轻。NMES对疼痛的显著总体效应估计与TENS相似,SMD为1.924。鞋垫对疼痛的总体效应估计为SMD 0.992。支具的总体效应显示疼痛显著减轻1.34。总体而言,发现所有四种非手术治疗方式对减轻膝关节OA疼痛均有显著效果。本研究表明,非手术物理治疗方式在治疗膝关节OA时是有益的。然而,所审查的许多文献评估的研究随访时间不到六个月:未来的工作应旨在评估随访时间更长的患者。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验