Dube Shanta R, Pathak Sarita, Nyman Amy L, Eriksen Michael P
Prev Med Rep. 2015;2:953-958. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2015.10.012.
Since the introduction of e-cigarettes into the U.S. market, the number and variety of vaping products has proliferated. E-hookahs are long, pen-like vaping devices that debuted in U.S. markets in 2014. By applying the Host, Agent, Vector, Environment (HAVE) Model, the objective of this exploratory study was to assess differences between e-cigarettes and e-hookahs to help inform tobacco regulatory science and practice.
In June-August 2014, a total of 54 unique manufactured e-cigarette and e-hookah products were identified at point of sales (POS) around three college campuses in Southeast U.S. Documented characteristics included brand name, disposable, rechargeable, nicotine containing, packaging, and flavor type. Statistical analyses were conducted October to November 2014 to assess frequency and percent of product type across POS and specific characteristics.
Among 54 products, 70.4% were e-cigarettes and 29.6% were e-hookahs. Across POS, drug stores and grocery stores carried e-cigarettes exclusively, while gas stations carried the greatest proportion of e-hookahs. Compared to e-hookahs, a greater proportion of e-cigarettes were non-disposable and contained nicotine; a greater proportion of e-hookahs came in fruit and other types of flavors compared to e-cigarettes.
The present study suggests that e-cigarettes and e-hookahs differ by specific product characteristics and by places where they are sold. Despite these differences, the products are used for similar purposes warranting careful monitoring of industry manufacturing and marketing, because the safety of both products is still undetermined. Additional research is needed to understand the uptake and continued use of these products.
自电子烟进入美国市场以来,雾化产品的数量和种类激增。电子水烟是一种笔状的长型雾化设备,于2014年在美国市场首次亮相。本探索性研究旨在通过应用宿主、媒介、载体、环境(HAVE)模型来评估电子烟和电子水烟之间的差异,为烟草监管科学与实践提供参考。
2014年6月至8月,在美国东南部三所大学校园周边的销售点(POS)共识别出54种独特的电子烟和电子水烟产品。记录的特征包括品牌名称、一次性、可充电、含尼古丁、包装和口味类型。2014年10月至11月进行了统计分析,以评估各销售点产品类型的频率和百分比以及具体特征。
在54种产品中,70.4%为电子烟,29.6%为电子水烟。在各销售点中,药店和杂货店仅销售电子烟,而加油站销售的电子水烟比例最高。与电子水烟相比,更大比例的电子烟为非一次性且含尼古丁;与电子烟相比,更大比例的电子水烟有水果和其他口味。
本研究表明,电子烟和电子水烟在特定产品特征和销售地点方面存在差异。尽管存在这些差异,但这些产品用于相似目的,鉴于两种产品的安全性仍未确定,因此有必要对行业制造和营销进行仔细监测。需要进一步研究以了解这些产品的使用情况和持续使用情况。