• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于团队的学习对护生神经系统检查知识的影响。

The Impact of Team-Based Learning on Nervous System Examination Knowledge of Nursing Students.

作者信息

Hemmati Maslakpak Masomeh, Parizad Naser, Zareie Farzad

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran.

Department of Nursing, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

出版信息

J Caring Sci. 2015 Dec 1;4(4):331-9. doi: 10.15171/jcs.2015.033. eCollection 2015 Dec.

DOI:10.15171/jcs.2015.033
PMID:26744732
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4699503/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Team-based learning is one of the active learning approaches in which independent learning is combined with small group discussion in the class. This study aimed to determine the impact of team-based learning in nervous system examination knowledge of nursing students.

METHODS

This quasi-experimental study was conducted on 3(rd) grade nursing students, including 5th semester (intervention group) and 6(th) semester (control group). The traditional lecture method and the team-based learning method were used for educating the examination of the nervous system for intervention and control groups, respectively. The data were collected by a test covering 40-questions (multiple choice, matching, gap-filling and descriptive questions) before and after intervention in both groups. Individual Readiness Assurance Test (RAT) and Group Readiness Assurance Test (GRAT) used to collect data in the intervention group. In the end, the collected data were analyzed by SPSS ver. 13 using descriptive and inferential statistical tests.

RESULTS

In team-based learning group, mean and standard deviation was 13.39 (4.52) before the intervention, which had been increased to 31.07 (3.20) after the intervention and this increase was statistically significant. Also, there was a statistically significant difference between the scores of RAT and GRAT in team-based learning group.

CONCLUSION

Using team-based learning approach resulted in much better improvement and stability in the nervous system examination knowledge of nursing students compared to traditional lecture method; therefore, this method could be efficiently used as an effective educational approach in nursing education.

摘要

引言

基于团队的学习是一种主动学习方法,它将自主学习与课堂上的小组讨论相结合。本研究旨在确定基于团队的学习对护理专业学生神经系统检查知识的影响。

方法

本准实验研究针对三年级护理专业学生开展,包括第五学期(干预组)和第六学期(对照组)。分别采用传统讲授法和基于团队的学习法对干预组和对照组进行神经系统检查的教学。通过在两组干预前后进行的一项包含40道题(多项选择题、匹配题、填空题和描述题)的测试收集数据。干预组使用个人准备度保证测试(RAT)和小组准备度保证测试(GRAT)收集数据。最后,使用SPSS 13.0版通过描述性和推断性统计检验对收集到的数据进行分析。

结果

在基于团队的学习组中,干预前的均值和标准差为13.39(4.52),干预后增至31.07(3.20),且这种增长具有统计学意义。此外,基于团队的学习组中RAT和GRAT的分数之间存在统计学显著差异。

结论

与传统讲授法相比,采用基于团队的学习方法能使护理专业学生在神经系统检查知识方面有更好的提高和稳定性;因此,该方法可有效地用作护理教育中的一种有效教学方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbd4/4699503/984f0c51c31a/JCS-4-331-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbd4/4699503/984f0c51c31a/JCS-4-331-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbd4/4699503/984f0c51c31a/JCS-4-331-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The Impact of Team-Based Learning on Nervous System Examination Knowledge of Nursing Students.基于团队的学习对护生神经系统检查知识的影响。
J Caring Sci. 2015 Dec 1;4(4):331-9. doi: 10.15171/jcs.2015.033. eCollection 2015 Dec.
2
Effects of team-based learning on perceived teamwork and academic performance in a health assessment subject.基于团队的学习对健康评估课程中团队协作认知及学业成绩的影响。
Collegian. 2015;22(3):299-305. doi: 10.1016/j.colegn.2014.05.001.
3
The impact of a team-based learning group readiness assurance test on nursing students' problem solving, learning satisfaction, and team efficacy: A crossover study.基于团队学习的小组准备情况保证测试对护生解决问题能力、学习满意度和团队效能的影响:一项交叉研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 May;100:104819. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104819. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
4
Comparison of the effect of lecture and blended teaching methods on students' learning and satisfaction.讲座式教学法与混合式教学法对学生学习及满意度影响的比较
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2014 Oct;2(4):146-50.
5
Applying team-based learning of diagnostics for undergraduate students: assessing teaching effectiveness by a randomized controlled trial study.对本科生应用基于团队的诊断学习法:通过随机对照试验研究评估教学效果。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2017 Mar 9;8:211-218. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S127626. eCollection 2017.
6
Roles of Two Learning Methods in the Perceived Competence of Surgery and Quality of Teaching: A Quasi-experimental Study among Operating Room Nursing Students.两种学习方法在手术认知能力和教学质量中的作用:一项针对手术室护生的准实验研究
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2024 Jul 1;12(3):180-188. doi: 10.30476/JAMP.2024.101481.1932. eCollection 2024 Jul.
7
The effect of team-based learning on public health students' educational outcomes.基于团队的学习对公共卫生专业学生教育成果的影响。
J Educ Health Promot. 2018 Nov 27;7:140. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_124_17. eCollection 2018.
8
Comparison of individual and team readiness assurance tests in a modified team based learning method.个体和团队准备情况保证测试在改良的团队为基础的学习方法中的比较。
J Dent Educ. 2020 Sep;84(9):1032-1036. doi: 10.1002/jdd.12190. Epub 2020 May 23.
9
The effect of interprofessional team-based learning among nursing students: A quasi-experimental study.跨专业团队学习对护理专业学生的影响:一项准实验研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Jun;53:13-18. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.03.004. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
10
Application of Case-Based Readiness Assurance Process as a Model for Case-Based Pedagogy and Collaborative Learning in Physiology.基于案例的准备保证过程作为生理学中基于案例的教学法和协作学习模型的应用。
Med Sci Educ. 2020 May 6;30(2):869-877. doi: 10.1007/s40670-020-00967-4. eCollection 2020 Jun.

引用本文的文献

1
Team based learning pedagogy enhances the education quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.基于团队的学习教学法提高教育质量:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Apr 21;25(1):580. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07175-x.
2
Clinical Instructors Experiences with Team Working in Clinical Education: A Descriptive Qualitative Study.临床教师在临床教育中团队合作的经历:一项描述性定性研究。
J Caring Sci. 2024 Nov 30;13(4):276-285. doi: 10.34172/jcs.33397. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
In-Person or Online? The Effect of Delivery Mode on Team-Based Learning of Clinical Reasoning in a Family Medicine Clerkship.

本文引用的文献

1
Implementing team based learning in large classes: nurse educators' experiences.在大班中实施基于团队的学习:护士教育工作者的经验
Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2011 Dec 21;8:/j/ijnes.2011.8.issue-1/1548-923X.2197/1548-923X.2197.xml. doi: 10.2202/1548-923X.2197.
2
The impact of team-based learning on a foundational pharmacokinetics course.团队学习对基础药代动力学课程的影响。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2012 Mar 12;76(2):31. doi: 10.5688/ajpe76231.
3
An active-learning strategies primer for achieving ability-based educational outcomes.
面授或在线?教学模式对家庭医学实习中基于团队的临床推理学习的影响。
Med Sci (Basel). 2022 Aug 8;10(3):41. doi: 10.3390/medsci10030041.
4
Team-Based Learning Among Health Care Professionals: A Systematic Review.医疗保健专业人员的基于团队的学习:一项系统综述。
Cureus. 2022 Jan 14;14(1):e21252. doi: 10.7759/cureus.21252. eCollection 2022 Jan.
5
Applying team-based learning of diagnostics for undergraduate students: assessing teaching effectiveness by a randomized controlled trial study.对本科生应用基于团队的诊断学习法:通过随机对照试验研究评估教学效果。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2017 Mar 9;8:211-218. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S127626. eCollection 2017.
实现基于能力的教育成果的主动学习策略基础
Am J Pharm Educ. 2011 Nov 10;75(9):186. doi: 10.5688/ajpe759186.
4
A controlled study of team-based learning for undergraduate clinical neurology education.团队学习在本科临床神经病学教育中的对照研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2011 Oct 30;11:91. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-11-91.
5
Team-based learning: systematic research review.团队学习:系统研究综述。
J Nurs Educ. 2011 Dec;50(12):665-9. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20111017-01. Epub 2011 Oct 17.
6
Team-based learning in anatomy: an efficient, effective, and economical strategy.团队学习在解剖学中的应用:一种高效、有效的策略。
Anat Sci Educ. 2011 Nov-Dec;4(6):333-9. doi: 10.1002/ase.257. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
7
Could lectures be stimulating? An approach to encourage active learning.讲座能具有启发性吗?一种鼓励主动学习的方法。
Libyan J Med. 2008 Jun 1;3(2):62. doi: 10.4176/080313.
8
A controlled trial of team-based learning in an ambulatory medicine clerkship for medical students.一项针对医学生在门诊医学实习中基于团队的学习的对照试验。
Teach Learn Med. 2011 Jan;23(1):31-6. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2011.536888.
9
The impact of team-based learning on medical students' academic performance.团队学习对医学生学业表现的影响。
Acad Med. 2010 Nov;85(11):1739-45. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181f52bed.
10
Using team-based learning to teach pharmacology to second year medical students improves student performance.采用团队学习的方法教授医学生药理学能够提高学生的表现。
Med Teach. 2010;32(2):130-5. doi: 10.3109/01421590903548521.