• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于案例的准备保证过程作为生理学中基于案例的教学法和协作学习模型的应用。

Application of Case-Based Readiness Assurance Process as a Model for Case-Based Pedagogy and Collaborative Learning in Physiology.

作者信息

Nayak Kirtana Raghurama, Punja Dhiren, Suryavanshi Chinmay Ajit, Kamath Asha

机构信息

Department of Physiology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka 576104 India.

Department of Medical Education, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka 576104 India.

出版信息

Med Sci Educ. 2020 May 6;30(2):869-877. doi: 10.1007/s40670-020-00967-4. eCollection 2020 Jun.

DOI:10.1007/s40670-020-00967-4
PMID:34457744
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8368491/
Abstract

The preclinical phase of the undergraduate medical curriculum has to embed clinically relevant learning experience to bridge basic sciences with clinical disciplines. Student-centric educational methods like the readiness assurance process of team-based learning promote active learning. In this study, we report our implementation of the case-based readiness assurance process (CBRAP) as a case-based strategy for introducing early clinical exposure in the preclinical phase of the undergraduate medical curriculum in India. Four CBRAPs with individual and group readiness assurance tests (IRAT and GRAT) were conducted in four different systems taught in physiology (hematology, muscle physiology, cardiovascular physiology, and renal physiology). The multiple-choice questions for CBRAP were specifically designed to test application and problem-solving by incorporating clinical vignettes with pathophysiology and lab findings. This study was designed to involve all 250 students from the first professional year. The GRAT scores were significantly more than mean IRAT scores in all four CBRAPs ( value < 0.001). The GRAT scores in the second, third, and fourth CBRAPs were significantly better than the GRAT score of the first CBRAP ( value < 0.001). The GRAT scores correlated significantly with mean IRAT in three out of four CBRAPs and with the highest IRAT in two out of four CBRAPs. Based on the student feedback of CBRAP and other case-based strategies, it was found that students preferred CBRAP and the majority of students reported that discussion of CBRAP questions with team members was useful. In conclusion, innovative case-based teaching methods with active student involvement can be incorporated in the preclinical curriculum for improving learning outcomes.

摘要

本科医学课程的临床前阶段必须融入与临床相关的学习体验,以弥合基础科学与临床学科之间的差距。以学生为中心的教育方法,如基于团队学习的准备度保证过程,可促进主动学习。在本研究中,我们报告了基于案例的准备度保证过程(CBRAP)的实施情况,这是一种基于案例的策略,用于在印度本科医学课程的临床前阶段引入早期临床接触。在生理学教授的四个不同系统(血液学、肌肉生理学、心血管生理学和肾脏生理学)中进行了四次CBRAP,并进行了个人和小组准备度保证测试(IRAT和GRAT)。CBRAP的多项选择题经过专门设计,通过将临床案例与病理生理学和实验室检查结果相结合来测试应用能力和解决问题的能力。本研究旨在纳入一年级所有250名学生。在所有四次CBRAP中,GRAT分数均显著高于平均IRAT分数( 值<0.001)。第二次、第三次和第四次CBRAP的GRAT分数显著高于第一次CBRAP的GRAT分数( 值<0.001)。在四次CBRAP中的三次中,GRAT分数与平均IRAT显著相关,在四次CBRAP中的两次中,GRAT分数与最高IRAT显著相关。根据学生对CBRAP和其他基于案例策略的反馈,发现学生更喜欢CBRAP,并且大多数学生报告说与团队成员讨论CBRAP问题很有用。总之,具有学生积极参与的创新型基于案例的教学方法可纳入临床前课程,以提高学习效果。

相似文献

1
Application of Case-Based Readiness Assurance Process as a Model for Case-Based Pedagogy and Collaborative Learning in Physiology.基于案例的准备保证过程作为生理学中基于案例的教学法和协作学习模型的应用。
Med Sci Educ. 2020 May 6;30(2):869-877. doi: 10.1007/s40670-020-00967-4. eCollection 2020 Jun.
2
Application of Modified Team-Based Learning Approach for Enhancing Undergraduate Medical Educational Seminars.应用改良的基于团队的学习方法提升本科医学教育研讨会效果
Med Sci Educ. 2019 Jul 26;29(4):1163-1170. doi: 10.1007/s40670-019-00776-4. eCollection 2019 Dec.
3
Impact of readiness assurance process and faculty feedback on individual application exercises: a model for continuous assessment in physiology.准备保证过程和教师反馈对个体应用练习的影响:生理学中持续评估的一种模式。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2020 Dec 1;44(4):509-515. doi: 10.1152/advan.00065.2020.
4
Evaluation of the effectiveness of student learning and teacher instruction on team-based learning during quality control of diagnostic imaging.在诊断影像学质量控制中,基于团队学习的学生学习和教师教学效果评价。
Med Educ Online. 2020 Dec;25(1):1732159. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2020.1732159.
5
Modified Team-Based Learning in an Ophthalmology Clerkship in China.中国眼科学实习中的改良团队学习法。
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 21;11(4):e0154250. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154250. eCollection 2016.
6
A Novel Grading Strategy for Team-Based Learning Exercises in a Hands-on Course in Molecular Biology for Senior Undergraduate Underrepresented Students in Medicine Resulted in Stronger Student Performance.一种针对医学领域中代表性不足的高年级本科学生的分子生物学实践课程中基于团队学习练习的新型评分策略,带来了更强的学生表现。
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2019 Mar;47(2):115-123. doi: 10.1002/bmb.21200. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
7
Effect of an individual readiness assurance test on a team readiness assurance test in the team-based learning of physiology.个体准备度保证测试对基于团队学习的生理学团队准备度保证测试的影响。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2013 Mar;37(1):61-4. doi: 10.1152/advan.00095.2012.
8
Maternal-Fetal Physiology, Intrapartum Care, Postpartum Care: A Team-Based Learning Module for Normal Obstetrics.母胎生理学、分娩期护理、产后护理:正常产科学基于团队的学习模块
MedEdPORTAL. 2019 Nov 22;15:10856. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10856.
9
A meta-analysis of students' readiness assurance test performance with team-based learning.基于团队学习的学生准备度保证测试表现的荟萃分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Jul 14;20(1):223. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02139-9.
10
First year medical student performance on weekly team-based learning exercises in an infectious diseases course: insights from top performers and struggling students.医学一年级学生在传染病课程中每周进行团队学习练习的表现:来自优秀生和困难生的见解。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jun 3;19(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1608-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Implementation of modified team-based learning within a problem based learning medical curriculum: a focus group study.在基于问题的医学课程中实施改良的团队学习:一项焦点小组研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Apr 10;18(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1172-8.
2
Implementation of team-based learning on a large scale: Three factors to keep in mind.团队学习的大规模实施:需要牢记的三个因素。
Med Teach. 2018 Jun;40(6):582-588. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1451630. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
3
Case-Based Learning and its Application in Medical and Health-Care Fields: A Review of Worldwide Literature.基于案例的学习及其在医疗卫生领域的应用:全球文献综述
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2016 Apr 27;3. doi: 10.4137/JMECD.S20377. eCollection 2016 Jan-Dec.
4
Development and validation of simulated virtual patients to impart early clinical exposure in endocrine physiology.用于在内分泌生理学中提供早期临床接触的模拟虚拟患者的开发与验证。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2018 Mar 1;42(1):15-20. doi: 10.1152/advan.00110.2017.
5
Team-based learning (TBL) in the medical curriculum: better than PBL?医学课程中的团队学习(TBL):比 PBL 更好?
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Dec 8;17(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-1068-z.
6
A systematic review of the published literature on team-based learning in health professions education.对已发表的关于卫生专业教育中基于团队学习的文献的系统综述。
Med Teach. 2017 Dec;39(12):1227-1237. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1340636. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
7
Assessment of first-year medical students' perceptions of teaching and learning through team-based learning sessions.评估医学生通过团队学习课程对教学的看法。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2016 Dec;40(4):536-542. doi: 10.1152/advan.00001.2016.
8
Modified Team-Based Learning in an Ophthalmology Clerkship in China.中国眼科学实习中的改良团队学习法。
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 21;11(4):e0154250. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154250. eCollection 2016.
9
Assessing the Effectiveness of Case-Based Collaborative Learning via Randomized Controlled Trial.通过随机对照试验评估基于案例的协作学习的有效性。
Acad Med. 2016 May;91(5):723-9. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001004.
10
Analysis of the Team-Based Learning Literature: TBL Comes of Age.基于团队学习的文献分析:基于团队的学习走向成熟。
J Excell Coll Teach. 2014;25(3-4):303-333.