Kroenke Candyce H, Michael Yvonne L, Shu Xiao-Ou, Poole Elizabeth M, Kwan Marilyn L, Nechuta Sarah, Caan Bette J, Pierce John P, Chen Wendy Y
Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Division of Research, Oakland, CA, USA.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Drexel University School of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Psychooncology. 2017 Apr;26(4):544-552. doi: 10.1002/pon.4059. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
Larger social networks have been associated with better breast cancer survival. To investigate potential mediators, we evaluated associations of social network size and diversity with lifestyle and treatment factors associated with prognosis.
We included 9331 women from the After Breast Cancer Pooling Project who provided data on social networks within approximately two years following diagnosis. A social network index was derived from information about the presence of a spouse or intimate partner, religious ties, community participation, friendship ties, and numbers of living relatives. Diversity was assessed as variety of ties, independent of size. We used logistic regression to evaluate associations with outcomes and evaluated whether effect estimates differed using meta-analytic techniques.
Associations were similar across cohorts though analyses of smoking and alcohol included US cohorts only because of low prevalence of these behaviors in the Shanghai cohort. Socially isolated women were more likely to be obese (OR = 1.21, 95% CI:1.03-1.42), have low physical activity (<10 MET-hours/week, OR = 1.55, 95% CI:1.36-1.78), be current smokers (OR = 2.77, 95% CI:2.09-3.68), and have high alcohol intake (≥15 g/d, OR = 1.23, 95% CI:1.00-1.51), compared with socially integrated women. Among node positive cases from three cohorts, socially isolated women were more likely not to receive chemotherapy (OR = 2.10, 95% CI:1.30-3.39); associations differed in a fourth cohort. Other associations (nonsignificant) were consistent with less intensive treatment in socially isolated women. Low social network diversity was independently associated with more adverse lifestyle, but not clinical, factors.
Small, less diverse social networks measured post-diagnosis were associated with more adverse lifestyle factors and less intensive cancer treatment. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
更大的社交网络与更好的乳腺癌生存率相关。为了探究潜在的中介因素,我们评估了社交网络规模和多样性与预后相关的生活方式及治疗因素之间的关联。
我们纳入了来自乳腺癌合并项目的9331名女性,她们在诊断后约两年内提供了社交网络数据。社交网络指数源自关于配偶或亲密伴侣的存在、宗教联系、社区参与、友谊关系以及在世亲属数量的信息。多样性被评估为关系的种类,与规模无关。我们使用逻辑回归来评估与结局的关联,并使用荟萃分析技术评估效应估计值是否存在差异。
各队列之间的关联相似,不过由于上海队列中吸烟和饮酒行为的患病率较低,吸烟和饮酒分析仅纳入了美国队列。与社交融入良好的女性相比,社交孤立的女性更有可能肥胖(比值比[OR]=1.21,95%置信区间[CI]:1.03 - 1.42)、身体活动水平低(<10代谢当量小时/周,OR = 1.55,95% CI:1.36 - 1.78)、当前吸烟(OR = 2.77,95% CI:2.09 - 3.68)以及酒精摄入量高(≥15克/天,OR = 1.23,95% CI:1.00 - 1.51)。在三个队列的淋巴结阳性病例中,社交孤立的女性更有可能未接受化疗(OR = 2.10,95% CI:1.30 - 3.39);在第四个队列中关联有所不同。其他关联(无统计学意义)与社交孤立女性接受的治疗强度较低一致。社交网络多样性低与更多不良生活方式因素独立相关,但与临床因素无关。
诊断后测得的社交网络规模小且多样性低与更多不良生活方式因素以及癌症治疗强度较低相关。版权所有© 2016约翰威立父子有限公司。