Sandoval Carmen, Barrera Aldo, Ferrés Marcela, Cerda Jaime, Retamal Javiera, García-Sastre Adolfo, Medina Rafael A, Hirsch Tamara
Departmento de Enfermedades Infecciosas e Inmulogia Pediátrica, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Laboratory of Infectious Diseases and Molecular Virology, Centro de Investigaciones Médicas, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 22;11(1):e0147271. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147271. eCollection 2016.
A novel H1N1 influenza A virus caused the first pandemic of the 21st century in 2009. Hospitals had an increased demand of health consultations, that made it difficult to estimate the incidence of infection in hospital personnel due to asymptomatic presentations and the under notification of cases. To estimate and compare the rate of exposure of high versus low risk health personnel to 2009 pandemic H1N1 (H1N1pdm2009) influenza A virus in a University Hospital in Chile, we performed a comparative and prospective study. Serum samples were obtained from 117 individuals that worked in the emergency room (ER) and the operating room (OR) during the peak of the pandemic. Antibody titers were determined by the hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay. Of the samples analyzed, 65% were workers at the ER and 35% at the OR. Of the total number of the subjects tested, 29.1% were seropositive. One out of 3 (36.8%) workers at the ER had positive HI titers, meanwhile only 1 out of 7 (14.6%) workers from the OR was seropositive to the virus. The possibility of being infected in the ER as compared to the OR was 3.4 times greater (OR 3.4; CI 95%, 1.27-9.1), and the individuals of the ER had almost twice as much antibody titers against H1N1pdm2009 than the personnel in the OR, suggesting the potential of more than one exposure to the virus. Of the 34 seropositive subjects, 12 (35.3%) did not develop influenza like illness, including 2 non-clinical personnel involved in direct contact with patients at the ER. Considering the estimated population attack rate in Chile of 13%, both groups presented a higher exposure and seropositive rate than the general population, with ER personnel showing greater risk of infection and a significantly higher level of antibodies. This data provide a strong rationale to design improved control measures aimed at all the hospital personnel, including those coming into contact with the patients prior to triage, to prevent the propagation and transmission of respiratory viruses, particularly during a pandemic outbreak.
一种新型甲型H1N1流感病毒在2009年引发了21世纪的首次大流行。医院对健康咨询的需求增加,这使得由于无症状表现和病例报告不足而难以估计医院工作人员的感染发生率。为了估计和比较智利一家大学医院中高风险与低风险医护人员接触2009年甲型H1N1大流行流感病毒(H1N1pdm2009)的比率,我们进行了一项比较性前瞻性研究。在大流行高峰期,从117名在急诊室(ER)和手术室(OR)工作的人员中采集了血清样本。通过血凝抑制(HI)试验测定抗体滴度。在分析的样本中,65%是急诊室工作人员,35%是手术室工作人员。在所有检测对象中,29.1%呈血清阳性。急诊室每3名工作人员中有1名(36.8%)HI滴度呈阳性,而手术室每7名工作人员中只有1名(14.6%)对该病毒呈血清阳性。与手术室相比,急诊室被感染的可能性高3.4倍(比值比3.4;95%置信区间,1.27 - 9.1),急诊室人员针对H1N1pdm2009的抗体滴度几乎是手术室人员的两倍,这表明可能不止一次接触该病毒。在34名血清阳性受试者中,12名(35.3%)未出现流感样疾病,其中包括2名在急诊室直接接触患者的非临床人员。考虑到智利估计的人群感染率为13%,两组的接触率和血清阳性率均高于普通人群,急诊室人员显示出更高的感染风险和显著更高的抗体水平。这些数据为设计针对所有医院工作人员的改进控制措施提供了有力依据,包括那些在分诊前接触患者的人员,以防止呼吸道病毒的传播,特别是在大流行爆发期间。