城市居民社区成员对参与生物医学研究的看法。
Urban-Dwelling Community Members' Views on Biomedical Research Engagement.
作者信息
Cortés Yamnia I, Arcia Adriana, Kearney Joan, Luchsinger Jose, Lucero Robert J
机构信息
University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Columbia University, New York City, New York, USA.
出版信息
Qual Health Res. 2017 Jan;27(1):130-137. doi: 10.1177/1049732315627650. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
Abstract
In this study, we explore community members' overall understanding and experience with biomedical research engagement. We conducted a qualitative analysis to explore a concept that emerged but was not specifically addressed in a pre-existing dataset obtained using four focus group sessions with 30 urban-dwelling community members. Transcripts were read in an iterative process, and an emergent content analysis was performed. Five main themes were identified: (a) engaging in research to contribute to personal or greater good, (b) hierarchy of trust, (c) the importance of disclosure and transparency, (d) practical barriers to research engagement, and (e) fear of research procedures. Community members view research engagement as a collaborative process whereby community members and researchers are involved in all stages of the investigation. Focusing on research engagement, and not merely participation, may enhance community knowledge of the research process and advance scientific knowledge.
摘要
在本研究中，我们探讨了社区成员对生物医学研究参与的总体理解和体验。我们进行了一项定性分析，以探究一个在使用与30名城市社区成员进行的四次焦点小组访谈所获得的现有数据集中出现但未具体涉及的概念。我们以迭代的方式阅读访谈记录，并进行了内容分析。确定了五个主要主题：(a) 参与研究以为个人或更大利益做出贡献；(b) 信任等级；(c) 披露和透明度的重要性；(d) 参与研究的实际障碍；以及 (e) 对研究程序的恐惧。社区成员将研究参与视为一个协作过程，在此过程中社区成员和研究人员参与调查的各个阶段。关注研究参与，而不仅仅是参与，可能会增强社区对研究过程的了解并推动科学知识的进步。
相似文献
1
Urban-Dwelling Community Members' Views on Biomedical Research Engagement.城市居民社区成员对参与生物医学研究的看法。
Qual Health Res. 2017 Jan;27(1):130-137. doi: 10.1177/1049732315627650. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
2
Reconstructing communities in cluster trials?在整群试验中重建社区？
Trials. 2016 Mar 28;17:166. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1284-6.
3
Developing a Culturally Informed Survey Instrument to Assess Biomedical Research Participation Among Latinos on the U.S.-Mexico Border.开发一种具有文化敏感性的调查工具，以评估美国-墨西哥边境地区拉丁裔人群参与生物医学研究的情况。
Qual Health Res. 2019 Feb;29(3):445-454. doi: 10.1177/1049732318801364. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
4
US Military Service Members' Reasons for Deciding to Participate in Health Research.美国军人决定参与健康研究的原因。
Res Nurs Health. 2017 Jun;40(3):263-272. doi: 10.1002/nur.21785. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
5
Benefits and Risks in Secondary Use of Digitized Clinical Data: Views of Community Members Living in a Predominantly Ethnic Minority Urban Neighborhood.数字化临床数据二次使用中的益处与风险：来自主要为少数族裔城市社区居民的观点
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2015;6(2):12-22. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2014.949906.
6
Public Interest in Medical Research Participation: Does It Matter if Patients or Community Members Have Helped Design the Study?公众对参与医学研究的兴趣：患者或社区成员是否参与研究设计重要吗？
Clin Transl Sci. 2015 Oct;8(5):502-5. doi: 10.1111/cts.12278. Epub 2015 May 25.
7
Views of potential research participants on financial conflicts of interest: barriers and opportunities for effective disclosure.潜在研究参与者对经济利益冲突的看法：有效披露的障碍与机遇
J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Sep;21(9):901-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00502.x.
8
Cross-cultural perspectives on research participation and informed consent.关于研究参与和知情同意的跨文化视角。
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Jan;62(2):479-90. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.06.012. Epub 2005 Jul 20.
9
Improving validity of informed consent for biomedical research in Zambia using a laboratory exposure intervention.通过实验室暴露干预提高赞比亚生物医学研究知情同意的有效性。
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 25;9(9):e108305. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108305. eCollection 2014.
10
Canadian research ethics board members' attitudes toward benefits from clinical trials.加拿大研究伦理委员会成员对临床试验益处的态度。
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Dec 2;16(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0079-8.
引用本文的文献
1
Respectful closure of a CEnR DNA integrity study: A bridge to sustained interactions with research participants.尊重地结束一项CEnR DNA完整性研究：与研究参与者持续互动的桥梁。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Apr 28;9(1):e110. doi: 10.1017/cts.2025.82. eCollection 2025.
2
Community leaders' perceptions of pain and research engagement: Implications for participant diversity and inclusion in pain clinical trials.社区领袖对疼痛的认知与研究参与度：对疼痛临床试验中参与者多样性及包容性的启示
J Pain. 2025 Apr 8:105389. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2025.105389.
3
Mixed-Methods Approach: Impact of Clinical Consenter Diversity on Clinical Trials Enrollment.混合方法研究：临床同意者多样性对临床试验入组的影响。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Mar 20;17(6):1043. doi: 10.3390/cancers17061043.
4
Lessons Learned in Clinical Research Recruitment of Midlife Latinas During COVID-19.在 COVID-19 期间招募中年拉丁裔女性参与临床研究的经验教训。
Menopause. 2022 Jul 1;29(7):883-888. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000001983.
5
Sharing research results with Latina breast cancer survivors who participated in a community-engaged behavioral RCT study: a descriptive cross-sectional survey study.与参与社区参与行为 RCT 研究的拉丁裔乳腺癌幸存者分享研究结果：描述性横断面调查研究。
Trials. 2022 Jan 8;23(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05945-8.
6
Predictors of Participation in Clinical Research.参与临床研究的预测因素。
Nurs Res. 2021;70(4):289-297. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000513.
7
Improving community participation in clinical and translational research: CTSA Sentinel Network proof of concept study.提高社区对临床和转化研究的参与度：CTSA哨兵网络概念验证研究
J Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Mar 10;4(4):323-330. doi: 10.1017/cts.2020.21.
8
Conducting secondary analysis of qualitative data: Should we, can we, and how?对定性数据进行二次分析：我们应该吗？我们能够吗？以及如何进行？
Qual Soc Work. 2019 Jan;18(1):81-97. doi: 10.1177/1473325017700701. Epub 2017 Apr 14.
9
Learning and Action in Community Health: Using the Health Belief Model to Assess and Educate African American Community Residents about Participation in Clinical Research.社区卫生中的学习与行动：运用健康信念模式评估和教育非裔美国社区居民参与临床研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Aug 28;15(9):1862. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15091862.
本文引用的文献
1
Benefits and Risks in Secondary Use of Digitized Clinical Data: Views of Community Members Living in a Predominantly Ethnic Minority Urban Neighborhood.数字化临床数据二次使用中的益处与风险：来自主要为少数族裔城市社区居民的观点
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2015;6(2):12-22. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2014.949906.
2
Why we need community engagement in medical research.为什么我们需要社区参与医学研究。
J Investig Med. 2014 Aug;62(6):851-5. doi: 10.1097/JIM.0000000000000097.
3
Under-representation of racial minorities in prostate cancer studies submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration to support potential marketing approval, 1993-2013.1993 年至 2013 年，向美国食品和药物管理局提交的支持潜在营销批准的前列腺癌研究中，少数族裔代表性不足。
Cancer. 2014 Oct 1;120(19):3025-32. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28809. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
4
The challenge to health professionals when carers resist truth telling at the end of life: a qualitative secondary analysis.当护理人员在生命末期拒绝告知真相时，健康专业人员面临的挑战：一项定性二次分析
J Clin Nurs. 2015 Apr;24(7-8):927-36. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12634. Epub 2014 May 22.
5
Informed consent for biobanking research: cancer patient recruitment from rural communities in Maine.生物样本库研究的知情同意：从缅因州农村社区招募癌症患者。
Biopreserv Biobank. 2013 Apr;11(2):107-14. doi: 10.1089/bio.2012.0054.
6
Reaching the hard-to-reach: a systematic review of strategies for improving health and medical research with socially disadvantaged groups.难以接触的人群：改善健康和医学研究与社会弱势群体相关的策略的系统评价。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Mar 25;14:42. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-42.
7
Twenty years post-NIH Revitalization Act: enhancing minority participation in clinical trials (EMPaCT): laying the groundwork for improving minority clinical trial accrual: renewing the case for enhancing minority participation in cancer clinical trials.NIH 复兴法案颁布 20 年后：增强少数族裔参与临床试验（EMPaCT）：为改善少数族裔临床试验入组奠定基础：重申增强少数族裔参与癌症临床试验的必要性。
Cancer. 2014 Apr 1;120 Suppl 7(0 7):1091-6. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28575.
8
Evaluating community engagement in an academic medical center.评估学术医学中心的社区参与度。
Acad Med. 2014 Apr;89(4):585-95. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000190.
9
Improving diversity in cancer research trials: the story of the Cancer Disparities Research Network.提高癌症研究试验的多样性：癌症差异研究网络的故事。
J Cancer Educ. 2014 Jun;29(2):366-74. doi: 10.1007/s13187-014-0617-y.
10
Unequal burden of disease, unequal participation in clinical trials: solutions from African American and Latino community members.疾病负担不平等，参与临床试验的机会不平等：非裔美国人和拉丁裔社区成员提出的解决方案。
Health Soc Work. 2013 Feb;38(1):29-38. doi: 10.1093/hsw/hlt001.
Zotero 插件