Nurs Res. 2021;70(4):289-297. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000513.
Despite numerous efforts to create more equitable healthcare systems, minority populations face long-standing health disparities compared to White populations. Healthcare research is the necessary foundation for creating equitable health systems and providing patient-centered care. Significant challenges exist, however, with recruiting and engaging underrepresented populations in clinical research.
The purpose of this analysis was to determine how research participants' race, trust, and level of education influence participation barriers in clinical research.
The study used secondary, cross-sectional survey data that were collected between 2014 and 2016 through the former Mid-South Clinical Data Research Network, currently known as the Stakeholders, Technology, and Research Clinical Research Network. Descriptive statistics and Spearman rank correlations were performed between level of education, level of trust, and each attitude statement for each racial category.
A total of 2,190 survey responses were used in the data analysis. The mean age of respondents was 52 years, with majority being women, White, insured, and working full time. Overall, the respondents had favorable attitudes toward research participation. Trust was correlated with agreement in many attitude statements for both White and African American respondents, whereas correlations with education level were more variable depending on racial grouping. Trust level was negatively associated with agreement toward the statement "researchers do not care about me" in White and Native American respondents.
The results support the importance of trust to research participation. Generally, education level was not strongly predictive of research participation, although prediction was influenced by race and attitude.
尽管为创建更公平的医疗保健体系做出了众多努力,但少数民族与白人相比,仍长期面临健康差距问题。医疗保健研究是创建公平的医疗保健体系和提供以患者为中心的护理的必要基础。然而,在招募和让代表性不足的人群参与临床研究方面仍存在重大挑战。
本分析旨在确定研究参与者的种族、信任度和受教育程度如何影响临床研究中的参与障碍。
该研究使用了 2014 年至 2016 年期间通过前中南部临床数据研究网络(现称为利益相关者、技术和研究临床研究网络)收集的二次、横断面调查数据。在每个种族类别中,对教育程度、信任程度和每个态度陈述之间进行了描述性统计和斯皮尔曼等级相关分析。
共有 2190 份调查回复用于数据分析。受访者的平均年龄为 52 岁,大多数为女性、白人、有保险且全职工作。总体而言,受访者对参与研究持有积极的态度。信任与白人和非裔美国受访者对许多态度陈述的一致性相关,而与教育程度的相关性则因种族分组而异。信任水平与白人和美国原住民受访者对“研究人员不关心我”这一陈述的一致性呈负相关。
结果支持信任对研究参与的重要性。一般来说,教育程度对研究参与的预测作用不强,尽管预测受到种族和态度的影响。