• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

聚类数据的倾向得分匹配:剖宫产对阿氏评分影响估计的应用

Propensity score matching with clustered data. An application to the estimation of the impact of caesarean section on the Apgar score.

作者信息

Arpino Bruno, Cannas Massimo

机构信息

Department of Political and Social Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.

Department of Economic and Business Science, University of Cagliari, Via Sant'Ignazio 17, Cagliari, 09124, Italy.

出版信息

Stat Med. 2016 May 30;35(12):2074-91. doi: 10.1002/sim.6880. Epub 2016 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1002/sim.6880
PMID:26833893
Abstract

This article focuses on the implementation of propensity score matching for clustered data. Different approaches to reduce bias due to cluster-level confounders are considered and compared using Monte Carlo simulations. We investigated methods that exploit the clustered structure of the data in two ways: in the estimation of the propensity score model (through the inclusion of fixed or random effects) or in the implementation of the matching algorithm. In addition to a pure within-cluster matching, we also assessed the performance of a new approach, 'preferential' within-cluster matching. This approach first searches for control units to be matched to treated units within the same cluster. If matching is not possible within-cluster, then the algorithm searches in other clusters. All considered approaches successfully reduced the bias due to the omission of a cluster-level confounder. The preferential within-cluster matching approach, combining the advantages of within-cluster and between-cluster matching, showed a relatively good performance both in the presence of big and small clusters, and it was often the best method. An important advantage of this approach is that it reduces the number of unmatched units as compared with a pure within-cluster matching. We applied these methods to the estimation of the effect of caesarean section on the Apgar score using birth register data. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

摘要

本文重点关注聚类数据倾向得分匹配的实施。使用蒙特卡罗模拟来考虑和比较不同的方法,以减少由于聚类层面混杂因素导致的偏差。我们研究了以两种方式利用数据聚类结构的方法:在倾向得分模型的估计中(通过纳入固定或随机效应)或在匹配算法的实施中。除了纯粹的聚类内匹配外,我们还评估了一种新方法——“优先”聚类内匹配的性能。这种方法首先在同一聚类内寻找要与处理单元匹配的对照单元。如果在聚类内无法匹配,那么算法就在其他聚类中搜索。所有考虑的方法都成功地减少了由于遗漏聚类层面混杂因素而导致的偏差。“优先”聚类内匹配方法结合了聚类内匹配和聚类间匹配的优点,在存在大聚类和小聚类的情况下都表现出相对较好的性能,并且它常常是最佳方法。与纯粹的聚类内匹配相比,这种方法的一个重要优点是它减少了未匹配单元的数量。我们将这些方法应用于使用出生登记数据估计剖宫产对阿氏评分的影响。版权所有© 2016约翰·威利父子有限公司。

相似文献

1
Propensity score matching with clustered data. An application to the estimation of the impact of caesarean section on the Apgar score.聚类数据的倾向得分匹配:剖宫产对阿氏评分影响估计的应用
Stat Med. 2016 May 30;35(12):2074-91. doi: 10.1002/sim.6880. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
2
A comparison of machine learning algorithms and covariate balance measures for propensity score matching and weighting.用于倾向得分匹配和加权的机器学习算法与协变量平衡度量的比较
Biom J. 2019 Jul;61(4):1049-1072. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201800132. Epub 2019 May 14.
3
An overview of propensity score matching methods for clustered data.基于聚类数据的倾向评分匹配方法概述。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2023 Apr;32(4):641-655. doi: 10.1177/09622802221133556. Epub 2022 Nov 25.
4
Within-center matching performed better when using propensity score matching to analyze multicenter survival data: empirical and Monte Carlo studies.使用倾向评分匹配分析多中心生存数据时,中心内匹配效果更好:实证和蒙特卡罗研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Sep;66(9):1029-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.03.018. Epub 2013 Jun 22.
5
The performance of inverse probability of treatment weighting and full matching on the propensity score in the presence of model misspecification when estimating the effect of treatment on survival outcomes.在估计治疗对生存结局的影响时,存在模型误设情况下治疗权重逆概率法和倾向得分完全匹配法的表现。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2017 Aug;26(4):1654-1670. doi: 10.1177/0962280215584401. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
6
Evaluating the performance of propensity score matching based approaches in individual patient data meta-analysis.评价基于倾向评分匹配方法在个体患者数据荟萃分析中的表现。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Nov 23;21(1):257. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01452-1.
7
Optimal full matching for survival outcomes: a method that merits more widespread use.生存结局的最优完全匹配:一种值得更广泛应用的方法。
Stat Med. 2015 Dec 30;34(30):3949-67. doi: 10.1002/sim.6602. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
8
Comparing the performance of propensity score methods in healthcare database studies with rare outcomes.比较倾向评分方法在具有罕见结局的医疗保健数据库研究中的性能。
Stat Med. 2017 May 30;36(12):1946-1963. doi: 10.1002/sim.7250. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
9
Propensity score applied to survival data analysis through proportional hazards models: a Monte Carlo study.通过比例风险模型将倾向得分应用于生存数据分析:一项蒙特卡洛研究。
Pharm Stat. 2012 May-Jun;11(3):222-9. doi: 10.1002/pst.537. Epub 2012 Mar 12.
10
A comparison of the ability of different propensity score models to balance measured variables between treated and untreated subjects: a Monte Carlo study.不同倾向得分模型平衡治疗组和未治疗组受试者间测量变量能力的比较:一项蒙特卡洛研究
Stat Med. 2007 Feb 20;26(4):734-53. doi: 10.1002/sim.2580.

引用本文的文献

1
Vaccine hesitancy and economic hardship: A latent class analysis of racial and ethnic minority communities at high risk of COVID-19 infection in Southern California.疫苗犹豫与经济困境:南加州新冠病毒感染高风险种族和少数族裔社区的潜在类别分析
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2025 Dec;21(1):2529612. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2025.2529612. Epub 2025 Jul 10.
2
A Matched Design for Causal Inference With Survey Data: Evaluation of Medical Marijuana Legalization in Kentucky and Tennessee.基于调查数据的因果推断匹配设计:肯塔基州和田纳西州医用大麻合法化评估。
Biom J. 2024 Dec;66(8):e70012. doi: 10.1002/bimj.70012.
3
Cardinality matching versus propensity score matching for addressing cluster-level residual confounding in implantable medical device and surgical epidemiology: a parametric and plasmode simulation study.
基于参数和等离子体模拟的研究:针对医疗器械和外科流行病学中基于簇的残余混杂问题,采用配比法和倾向评分匹配法的比较。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Nov 22;24(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02406-z.
4
A new method for clustered survival data: Estimation of treatment effect heterogeneity and variable selection.一种新的聚类生存数据分析方法:处理效应异质性估计和变量选择。
Biom J. 2024 Jan;66(1):e2200178. doi: 10.1002/bimj.202200178. Epub 2023 Dec 10.
5
Effect of optimal antenatal care on maternal and perinatal health in Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚最佳产前护理对孕产妇和围产期健康的影响。
Front Pediatr. 2023 Feb 7;11:1120979. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1120979. eCollection 2023.
6
Protocol for a Prospective Observational Study of Revision Palatoplasty Versus Pharyngoplasty for Treatment of Velopharyngeal Insufficiency Following Cleft Palate Repair.腭裂修复术后并发咽鼓管功能不良的前瞻性观察性研究:经软腭修补术与咽成形术治疗的比较
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2024 May;61(5):870-881. doi: 10.1177/10556656221147159. Epub 2022 Dec 23.
7
An overview of propensity score matching methods for clustered data.基于聚类数据的倾向评分匹配方法概述。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2023 Apr;32(4):641-655. doi: 10.1177/09622802221133556. Epub 2022 Nov 25.
8
A flexible approach for causal inference with multiple treatments and clustered survival outcomes.一种适用于多处理和聚类生存结局的因果推断的灵活方法。
Stat Med. 2022 Nov 10;41(25):4982-4999. doi: 10.1002/sim.9548. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
9
Propensity score methods for observational studies with clustered data: A review.基于聚类数据的观察性研究的倾向评分方法:综述。
Stat Med. 2022 Aug 15;41(18):3612-3626. doi: 10.1002/sim.9437. Epub 2022 May 23.
10
Selecting External Controls for Internal Cases Using Stratification Score Matching Methods.使用分层评分匹配方法选择内部病例的外部对照。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 23;19(5):2549. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052549.