Zhou Jing, Kim Jung Eun, Armstrong Cheryl Lh, Chen Ningning, Campbell Wayne W
Departments of Nutrition Science and.
Statistics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Am J Clin Nutr. 2016 Mar;103(3):766-74. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.115.124669. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
Limited and inconsistent research findings exist about the effect of dietary protein intake on indexes of sleep.
We assessed the effect of protein intake during dietary energy restriction on indexes of sleep in overweight and obese adults in 2 randomized, controlled feeding studies.
For study 1, 14 participants [3 men and 11 women; mean ± SE age: 56 ± 3 y; body mass index (BMI; in kg/m(2)): 30.9 ± 0.6] consumed energy-restricted diets (a 750-kcal/d deficit) with either beef and pork (BP; n = 5) or soy and legume (SL; n = 9) as the main protein sources for 3 consecutive 4-wk periods with 10% (control), 20%, or 30% of total energy from protein (random order). At baseline and the end of each period, the global sleep score (GSS) was assessed with the use of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) questionnaire. For study 2, 44 participants (12 men and 32 women; age: 52 ± 1 y; BMI: 31.4 ± 0.5) consumed a 3-wk baseline energy-balance diet with 0.8 g protein · kg baseline body mass(-1) · d(-1). Then, study 2 subjects consumed either a normal-protein [NP (control); n = 23] or a high-protein (HP; n = 21) (0.8 compared with 1.5 g · kg(-1) · d(-1), respectively) energy-restricted diet (a 750-kcal/d deficit) for 16 wk. The PSQI was administered during baseline week 3 and intervention weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16. GSSs ranged from 0 to 21 arbitrary units (au), with a higher value representing a worse GSS during the preceding month.
In study 1, we showed that a higher protein quantity improved GSSs independent of the protein source. The GSS was higher (P < 0.05) when 10% (6.0 ± 0.4 au) compared with 20% (5.0 ± 0.4 au) protein was consumed, with 30% protein (5.4 ± 0.6 au) intermediate. In study 2, at baseline, the GSS was not different between NP (5.2 ± 0.5 au) and HP (5.4 ± 0.5 au) groups. Over time, the GSS was unchanged for the NP group and improved for the HP group (P-group-by-time interaction < 0.05). After intervention (week 16), GSSs for NP and HP groups were 5.9 ± 0.5 and 4.0 ± 0.6 au, respectively (P < 0.01).
The consumption of a greater proportion of energy from protein while dieting may improve sleep in overweight and obese adults. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01005563 (study 1) and NCT01692860 (study 2).
关于膳食蛋白质摄入量对睡眠指标的影响,现有研究结果有限且不一致。
在两项随机对照喂养研究中,我们评估了超重和肥胖成年人在膳食能量限制期间蛋白质摄入量对睡眠指标的影响。
在研究1中,14名参与者[3名男性和11名女性;平均±标准误年龄:56±3岁;体重指数(BMI;单位:kg/m²):30.9±0.6]连续3个为期4周的时间段内食用能量限制饮食(每日能量缺口750千卡),分别以牛肉和猪肉(BP组;n = 5)或大豆和豆类(SL组;n = 9)作为主要蛋白质来源,蛋白质占总能量的比例分别为10%(对照组)、20%或30%(随机顺序)。在基线期和每个时间段结束时,使用匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)问卷评估总体睡眠评分(GSS)。在研究2中,44名参与者(12名男性和32名女性;年龄:52±1岁;BMI:31.4±0.5)先食用为期3周的基线能量平衡饮食,蛋白质摄入量为0.8克·千克基线体重⁻¹·天⁻¹。然后,研究2的受试者食用正常蛋白质[NP(对照组);n = 23]或高蛋白质(HP;n = 21)(分别为0.8克·千克⁻¹·天⁻¹与1.5克·千克⁻¹·天⁻¹)能量限制饮食(每日能量缺口750千卡),为期16周。在基线期第3周以及干预期第4、8、12和16周进行PSQI评估。GSS范围为0至21任意单位(au),数值越高表示前一个月的GSS越差。
在研究1中,我们发现较高的蛋白质量可改善GSS,且与蛋白质来源无关。摄入10%蛋白质(6.0±0.4 au)时的GSS高于摄入20%蛋白质(5.0±0.4 au)时(P<0.05),摄入30%蛋白质时(5.4±0.6 au)介于两者之间。在研究2中,基线时,NP组(5.2±0.5 au)和HP组(5.4±0.5 au)的GSS无差异。随着时间推移,NP组的GSS无变化,而HP组的GSS有所改善(组间与时间的交互作用P<0.05)。干预后(第16周),NP组和HP组的GSS分别为5.9±0.5和4.0±0.6 au(P<0.01)。
节食期间摄入占能量更大比例的蛋白质可能改善超重和肥胖成年人的睡眠。本试验在clinicaltrials.gov上注册,注册号为NCT01005563(研究1)和NCT01692860(研究2)。