Unidad Clínica y de Investigación en Lípidos y Aterosclerosis, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Aragón (IIS Aragón), Zaragoza, Spain.
Unidad Clínica y de Investigación en Lípidos y Aterosclerosis, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Aragón (IIS Aragón), Zaragoza, Spain.
Clin Nutr. 2017 Apr;36(2):371-379. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.01.018. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: High-protein energy-restricted diets have demonstrated efficacy in promoting weight loss in overweight and obesity. However, the protein percentage that achieves optimal efficacy and acceptability remains unknown. We sought to assess the effects of three energy-reduced diets with different percentages of calories from protein (20%, 27%, and 35%) on weight loss and lipids. Secondary outcomes included diet acceptability and compliance.
Six-month, randomized study included women aged 18-80 years with BMI of 27.5-45 kg/m and who were not taking lipid-lowering drugs. We randomly assigned 91 women to one of three calorie-reduced diets with: protein, 20%, 27%, or 35% (80% from animal protein); carbohydrates, 50%, 43%, or 35%; fat, 30%. Dietary intervention involved individual visits with a nutritionist every 2 weeks during the first 3 months. We performed a follow-up visit at 6 months.
Eighty women aged 44.0 ± 9.08 years with BMI of 37.7 ± 3.39 kg/m completed the study. At 3 months, weight loss was -8.16 ± 4.18 kg, -9.66 ± 5.28 kg, and -10.7 ± 4.28 kg in the 20%, 27%, and 35%-protein groups, respectively (P = 0.16). These figures slightly and homogeneously increased at 6 months. Around 65% of women following 35%-protein diet lost ≥10% of body weight vs. ∼33% in 20%-protein group (P = 0.023). Significant decreases occurred in fat mass, lipids and insulin resistance, especially in the 35%-protein group (P < 0.05 vs. 20% protein). This improvement was not fully explained by weight loss. Triglyceride change was negatively correlated with animal-protein intake. All groups provided similar responses to an acceptance, palatability, and satisfaction questionnaire.
An energy-restricted diet with 35% protein, mostly of animal origin, more effectively impacts cardiometabolic profile than an energy-restricted diet with lower protein content although no clear benefit between diets in terms of overall weight loss was observed. The high-protein diet displayed an excellent safety profile and acceptability. This trial was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT02160496.
The clinical trial has been registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT02160496).
高蛋白能量限制饮食已被证明可有效促进超重和肥胖人群减轻体重。然而,实现最佳疗效和可接受性的蛋白质百分比仍不清楚。我们旨在评估三种不同蛋白供能百分比(20%、27%和 35%)的能量限制饮食对体重减轻和血脂的影响。次要结局包括饮食接受度和依从性。
本为期 6 个月的随机研究纳入了年龄在 18-80 岁之间、BMI 为 27.5-45kg/m²且未服用降脂药物的女性。我们将 91 名女性随机分配到三种热量限制饮食中的一种:蛋白质 20%、27%或 35%(80%来自动物蛋白);碳水化合物 50%、43%或 35%;脂肪 30%。膳食干预包括在前 3 个月内每 2 周由营养师进行一次个体访视。我们在 6 个月时进行了随访。
80 名年龄为 44.0±9.08 岁、BMI 为 37.7±3.39kg/m²的女性完成了研究。3 个月时,20%、27%和 35%蛋白质组的体重减轻分别为-8.16±4.18kg、-9.66±5.28kg 和-10.7±4.28kg(P=0.16)。这些数值在 6 个月时略有且均匀地增加。约 65%的 35%蛋白质饮食组女性体重减轻≥10%,而 20%蛋白质组女性体重减轻约 33%(P=0.023)。脂肪量、血脂和胰岛素抵抗显著降低,尤其是在 35%蛋白质组(P<0.05 与 20%蛋白质)。这种改善不能完全用体重减轻来解释。甘油三酯的变化与动物蛋白的摄入呈负相关。所有组对接受、适口性和满意度问卷的反应相似。
与低蛋白含量的能量限制饮食相比,富含 35%蛋白质(主要来自动物)的能量限制饮食更有效地影响心脏代谢特征,尽管在总体体重减轻方面,两种饮食之间没有明显的益处。高蛋白饮食具有极好的安全性和可接受性。本试验已在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册(标识符:NCT02160496)。
该临床试验已在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册(标识符:NCT02160496)。