• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

语义斯特鲁普效应:一种前高斯分析。

The semantic Stroop effect: An ex-Gaussian analysis.

作者信息

White Darcy, Risko Evan F, Besner Derek

机构信息

Psychology Department, Perception and Cognition Unit (CPU), University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Oct;23(5):1576-1581. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1014-9.

DOI:10.3758/s13423-016-1014-9
PMID:26907601
Abstract

Previous analyses of the standard Stroop effect (which typically uses color words that form part of the response set) have documented effects on mean reaction times in hundreds of experiments in the literature. Less well known is the fact that ex-Gaussian analyses reveal that such effects are seen in (a) the mean of the normal distribution (mu), as well as in (b) the standard deviation of the normal distribution (sigma) and (c) the tail (tau). No ex-Gaussian analysis exists in the literature with respect to the semantically based Stroop effect (which contrasts incongruent color-associated words with, e.g., neutral controls). In the present experiments, we investigated whether the semantically based Stroop effect is also seen in the three ex-Gaussian parameters. Replicating previous reports, color naming was slower when the color was carried by an irrelevant (but incongruent) color-associated word (e.g., sky, tomato) than when the control items consisted of neutral words (e.g., keg, palace) in each of four experiments. An ex-Gaussian analysis revealed that this semantically based Stroop effect was restricted to the arithmetic mean and mu; no semantic Stroop effect was observed in tau. These data are consistent with the views (1) that there is a clear difference in the source of the semantic Stroop effect, as compared to the standard Stroop effect (evidenced by the presence vs. absence of an effect on tau), and (2) that interference associated with response competition on incongruent trials in tau is absent in the semantic Stroop effect.

摘要

以往对标准斯特鲁普效应(通常使用构成反应集一部分的颜色词)的分析已在数百篇文献实验中记录了对平均反应时间的影响。鲜为人知的是,前高斯分析表明,这种效应体现在:(a)正态分布的均值(μ),以及(b)正态分布的标准差(σ)和(c)尾部(τ)。关于基于语义的斯特鲁普效应(将不一致的颜色关联词与例如中性对照进行对比),文献中不存在前高斯分析。在本实验中,我们研究了基于语义的斯特鲁普效应是否也体现在这三个前高斯参数中。重复先前的报告,在四个实验中的每一个实验里,当颜色由不相关(但不一致)的颜色关联词(例如天空、西红柿)呈现时,颜色命名比对照项目由中性词(例如小桶、宫殿)呈现时更慢。前高斯分析表明,这种基于语义的斯特鲁普效应仅限于算术平均值和μ;在τ中未观察到语义斯特鲁普效应。这些数据与以下观点一致:(1)与标准斯特鲁普效应相比,语义斯特鲁普效应的来源存在明显差异(τ上有无效应可证明);(2)语义斯特鲁普效应中不存在与τ中不一致试验上的反应竞争相关的干扰。

相似文献

1
The semantic Stroop effect: An ex-Gaussian analysis.语义斯特鲁普效应:一种前高斯分析。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Oct;23(5):1576-1581. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1014-9.
2
Response Time Distribution Analysis of Semantic and Response Interference in a Manual Response Stroop Task.手动反应Stroop任务中语义和反应干扰的反应时间分布分析
Exp Psychol. 2019 May;66(3):231-238. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000445.
3
Disentangling Genuine Semantic Stroop Effects in Reading from Contingency Effects: On the Need for Two Neutral Baselines.区分阅读中真正的语义斯特鲁普效应与偶然效应:论两个中性基线的必要性。
Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 17;7:386. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00386. eCollection 2016.
4
The semantic Stroop effect is controlled by endogenous attention.语义斯特鲁普效应受内源性注意控制。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Nov;44(11):1730-1742. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000552. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
5
A horse race of a different color: Stroop interference patterns with transformed words.一场别样的赛马比赛:变换词的斯特鲁普干扰模式
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1984 Oct;10(5):622-39. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.10.5.622.
6
Distributional analysis of semantic interference in picture naming.图片命名中语义干扰的分布分析
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Apr;70(4):782-792. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1165264. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
7
Attention, spatial integration, and the tail of response time distributions in Stroop task performance.注意、空间整合与斯特鲁普任务表现中反应时间分布的尾部
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012;65(1):135-50. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.605152. Epub 2011 Sep 21.
8
Semantic component of a cross-modal Stroop-like task.一种跨模态类斯特鲁普任务的语义成分。
Am J Psychol. 1993 Fall;106(3):383-405.
9
Effects of response type and set size on Stroop color-word performance.反应类型和刺激集大小对斯特鲁普颜色-文字任务表现的影响。
Percept Mot Skills. 1983 Jun;56(3):735-43. doi: 10.2466/pms.1983.56.3.735.
10
Likelihood of attending to the color word modulates Stroop interference.关注颜色词的可能性会调节斯特鲁普干扰。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012 Feb;74(2):416-29. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0250-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Vagally mediated heart rate variability modulates the association between the perceived workload and the Stroop effect on behavioral performance.迷走神经介导的心率变异性调节了感知工作量与Stroop效应在行为表现上的关联。
Physiol Rep. 2025 Jul;13(14):e70466. doi: 10.14814/phy2.70466.
2
The loci of Stroop effects: a critical review of methods and evidence for levels of processing contributing to color-word Stroop effects and the implications for the loci of attentional selection.Stroop 效应的位置:对影响颜色词 Stroop 效应的加工层次的方法和证据的批判性回顾,以及对注意选择位置的影响。
Psychol Res. 2022 Jun;86(4):1029-1053. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01554-x. Epub 2021 Aug 13.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Automaticity revisited: when print doesn't activate semantics.重新审视自动性:当印刷不能激活语义。
Front Psychol. 2015 Feb 10;6:117. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00117. eCollection 2015.
2
Behavioral and electrophysiological investigation of semantic and response conflict in the Stroop task.斯特鲁普任务中语义和反应冲突的行为学与电生理学研究
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Apr;22(2):543-9. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0697-z.
3
Suggestion does not de-automatize word reading: evidence from the semantically based Stroop task.建议不会使单词阅读自动化:基于语义的 Stroop 任务的证据。
Delta plots for conflict tasks: An activation-suppression race model.
冲突任务的 Delta 图:激活-抑制竞争模型。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Dec;28(6):1776-1795. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-01900-5. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
4
The effect of high-frequency rTMS of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on the resolution of response, semantic and task conflict in the colour-word Stroop task.左背外侧前额叶皮层高频重复经颅磁刺激对颜色-词斯特鲁普任务中反应、语义和任务冲突的解决的影响。
Brain Struct Funct. 2021 May;226(4):1241-1252. doi: 10.1007/s00429-021-02237-4. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
5
Neuropsychological Decomposing Stroop Interference Into Different Cognitive Monitoring: An Exploratory Factor Analysis.将斯特鲁普干扰分解为不同认知监控的神经心理学研究:探索性因素分析
Basic Clin Neurosci. 2019 Sep-Oct;10(5):475-483. doi: 10.32598/bcn.9.10.265. Epub 2019 Sep 1.
6
How different direct association routes influence the indirect route in the same Simon-like task.在相同的 Simon 类似任务中,不同的直接关联途径如何影响间接途径。
Psychol Res. 2019 Nov;83(8):1733-1748. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1024-5. Epub 2018 May 14.
7
Some further clarifications on age-related differences in Stroop interference.关于Stroop干扰中与年龄相关差异的一些进一步说明。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Apr;25(2):767-774. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1427-0.
8
The location-, word-, and arrow-based Simon effects: An ex-Gaussian analysis.基于位置、字词和箭头的西蒙效应:一项高斯分布拟合分析。
Mem Cognit. 2018 Apr;46(3):497-506. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0767-3.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Jun;19(3):521-7. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0217-y.
4
A tutorial on a practical Bayesian alternative to null-hypothesis significance testing.关于实用贝叶斯替代零假设检验的教程。
Behav Res Methods. 2011 Sep;43(3):679-90. doi: 10.3758/s13428-010-0049-5.
5
Single-letter coloring and spatial cuing do not eliminate or reduce a semantic contribution to the Stroop effect.单字母着色和空间提示并不能消除或减少语义对斯特鲁普效应的贡献。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2010 Dec;17(6):827-33. doi: 10.3758/PBR.17.6.827.
6
Predicting conversion to dementia of the Alzheimer's type in a healthy control sample: the power of errors in Stroop color naming.预测健康对照组阿尔茨海默病型痴呆的转化:Stroop 颜色命名错误的作用。
Psychol Aging. 2010 Mar;25(1):208-18. doi: 10.1037/a0017474.
7
On the additive effects of stimulus quality and word frequency in lexical decision: evidence for opposing interactive influences revealed by RT distributional analyses.关于词汇判断中刺激质量和词频的相加效应:反应时分布分析揭示的相反交互影响的证据
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 May;34(3):495-513. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.3.495.
8
A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values.解决p值普遍存在问题的实用方法。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Oct;14(5):779-804. doi: 10.3758/bf03194105.
9
Filling a gap in the semantic gradient: color associates and response set effects in the Stroop task.填补语义梯度中的空白:斯特鲁普任务中的颜色联想与反应集效应
Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Apr;13(2):310-5. doi: 10.3758/bf03193849.
10
Dissociating stimulus-stimulus and response-response effects in the Stroop task.在斯特鲁普任务中区分刺激-刺激和反应-反应效应。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2005 Jun;59(2):132-8. doi: 10.1037/h0087468.