The Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27516, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 20;17(20):7637. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207637.
The U.S. food system is rapidly changing, including the growth of mass merchandisers and dollar stores, which may impact the quality of packaged food purchases (PFPs). Furthermore, diet-related disparities exist by socioeconomic status (SES) and rural residence. We use data from the 2010-2018 Nielsen Homescan Panel to describe the nutritional profiles of PFPs by store type and to assess whether these vary by household urbanicity and SES. Store types include grocery stores, mass merchandisers, club stores, online shopping, dollar stores, and convenience/drug stores. Food and beverage groups contributing the most calories at each store type are estimated using survey-weighted means, while the associations of urbanicity and SES with nutritional quality are estimated using multivariate regression. We find that households that are customers at particular store types purchase the same quality of food regardless of urbanicity or SES. However, we find differences in the quality of foods between store types and that the quantity of calories purchased at each store type varies according to household urbanicity and SES. Rural shoppers tend to shop more at mass merchandisers and dollar stores with less healthful PFPs. We discuss implications for the types of store interventions most relevant for improving the quality of PFPs.
美国的食品体系正在迅速变化,包括大众零售商和美元商店的增长,这可能会影响包装食品的购买质量(PFPs)。此外,饮食相关的差异存在于社会经济地位(SES)和农村居民之间。我们使用 2010-2018 年尼尔森家庭扫描面板的数据,根据商店类型描述 PFPs 的营养概况,并评估这些概况是否因家庭城市化程度和 SES 而有所不同。商店类型包括杂货店、大众零售商、俱乐部商店、在线购物、美元商店和便利店/药店。使用调查加权平均值估计每种商店类型中贡献最多卡路里的食品和饮料组,同时使用多元回归估计城市化程度和 SES 与营养质量的关联。我们发现,无论城市化程度或 SES 如何,光顾特定商店类型的家庭购买的食品质量相同。然而,我们发现商店类型之间的食品质量存在差异,并且根据家庭城市化程度和 SES 的不同,每种商店类型购买的卡路里数量也有所不同。农村购物者往往更倾向于在大众零售商和美元商店购物,这些商店的 PFPs 不太健康。我们讨论了最相关的商店干预类型的影响,以提高 PFPs 的质量。