• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

沙特阿拉伯大学医院的医疗质量:一项系统综述。

Quality of care in university hospitals in Saudi Arabia: a systematic review.

作者信息

Aljuaid Mohammed, Mannan Fahmida, Chaudhry Zain, Rawaf Salman, Majeed Azeem

机构信息

Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK Department of Health Administration, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2016 Feb 25;6(2):e008988. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008988.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008988
PMID:26916686
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4769408/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To identify the key issues, problems, barriers and challenges particularly in relation to the quality of care in university hospitals in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), and to provide recommendations for improvement.

METHODS

A systematic search was carried out using five electronic databases, for articles published between January 2004 and January 2015. We included studies conducted in university hospitals in KSA that focused on the quality of healthcare. Three independent reviewers verified that the studies met the inclusion criteria, assessed the quality of the studies and extracted their relevant characteristics. All studies were assessed using the Institute of Medicine indicators of quality of care.

RESULTS

Of the 1430 references identified in the initial search, eight studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria. The included studies clearly highlight a need to improve the quality of healthcare delivery, specifically in areas of patient safety, clinical effectiveness and patient-centredness, at university hospitals in KSA. Problems with quality of care could be due to failures of leadership, a requirement for better management and a need to establish a culture of safety alongside leadership reform in university hospitals. Lack of instructions given to patients and language communication were key factors impeding optimum delivery of patient-centred care. Decision-makers in KSA university hospitals should consider programmes and assessment tools to reveal problems and issues related to language as a barrier to quality of care.

CONCLUSIONS

This review exemplifies the need for further improvement in the quality of healthcare in university hospitals in KSA. Many of the problems identified in this review could be addressed by establishing an independent body in KSA, which could monitor healthcare services and push for improvements in efficiency and quality of care.

摘要

目的

确定关键问题、难题、障碍和挑战,特别是与沙特阿拉伯王国(KSA)大学医院护理质量相关的问题,并提供改进建议。

方法

利用五个电子数据库对2004年1月至2015年1月发表的文章进行系统检索。我们纳入了在KSA大学医院进行的、聚焦于医疗保健质量的研究。三位独立评审员核实这些研究符合纳入标准,评估研究质量并提取其相关特征。所有研究均使用医学研究所的护理质量指标进行评估。

结果

在初步检索中识别出的1430篇参考文献中,有八项研究符合纳入标准。纳入的研究明确凸显了KSA大学医院在改善医疗服务质量方面的必要性,特别是在患者安全、临床疗效和以患者为中心等领域。护理质量问题可能归因于领导力的缺失、更好管理的需求以及在大学医院进行领导力改革的同时建立安全文化的必要性。对患者缺乏指导以及语言沟通是阻碍以患者为中心的护理最佳实施的关键因素。KSA大学医院的决策者应考虑采用相关项目和评估工具,以揭示与语言作为护理质量障碍相关的问题。

结论

本综述例证了KSA大学医院医疗保健质量需要进一步改善。本综述中确定的许多问题可通过在KSA设立一个独立机构来解决,该机构可监督医疗服务并推动提高护理效率和质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd85/4769408/83d9f9cf7306/bmjopen2015008988f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd85/4769408/83d9f9cf7306/bmjopen2015008988f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd85/4769408/83d9f9cf7306/bmjopen2015008988f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Quality of care in university hospitals in Saudi Arabia: a systematic review.沙特阿拉伯大学医院的医疗质量:一项系统综述。
BMJ Open. 2016 Feb 25;6(2):e008988. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008988.
2
The effectiveness of interventions to meet family needs of critically ill patients in an adult intensive care unit: a systematic review update.成人重症监护病房中满足重症患者家庭需求的干预措施的有效性:系统评价更新
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Mar;14(3):181-234. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2477.
3
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
4
Effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership on health services planning, delivery and evaluation.消费者和医疗服务提供者合作对卫生服务规划、提供和评估的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 15;9(9):CD013373. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013373.pub2.
5
Experiences of registered nurses as managers and leaders in residential aged care facilities: a systematic review.注册护士在养老院的管理和领导经验:系统评价。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2011 Dec;9(4):388-402. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2011.00239.x.
6
Quality improvement strategies for diabetes care: Effects on outcomes for adults living with diabetes.糖尿病护理质量改进策略:对成年糖尿病患者结局的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 31;5(5):CD014513. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014513.
7
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
8
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
9
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
10
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.医疗机构内协作的测量:对测量工具属性的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient-centered care and satisfaction of patients with diabetes: insights from a survey among patients at primary healthcare centers in Saudi Arabia.以患者为中心的护理与糖尿病患者的满意度:来自沙特阿拉伯初级医疗保健中心患者调查的见解
BMC Prim Care. 2025 May 1;26(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02778-1.
2
Patient satisfaction among Saudi academic hospitals: a systematic review.沙特学术医院的患者满意度:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 20;14(5):e081185. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081185.
3
Privatization of Medical Services and Revenue Development Project: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Staff Perceptions at the University of Jeddah Medical Center.

本文引用的文献

1
Relationship between nurses' and physicians' perceptions of organizational health and quality of patient care.护士与医生对组织健康和患者护理质量的认知之间的关系。
East Mediterr Health J. 2014 Oct 20;20(10):634-42.
2
Systematic review of quality of care in Saudi Arabia. A forecast of a high quality health care.沙特阿拉伯医疗服务质量的系统评价。对高质量医疗保健的预测。
Saudi Med J. 2014 Aug;35(8):802-9.
3
Patient safety culture in a large teaching hospital in Riyadh: baseline assessment, comparative analysis and opportunities for improvement.
医疗服务私有化与收入发展项目:吉达大学医学中心员工认知的横断面调查
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Sep 14;11(18):2540. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11182540.
4
Attitudes of medical students in Khartoum, Sudan towards the doctor-patient relationship: a cross-sectional study.苏丹喀土穆医学生对医患关系的态度:一项横断面研究。
PeerJ. 2023 Jul 3;11:e15434. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15434. eCollection 2023.
5
2022 Saudi Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidemia.《2022年沙特血脂异常管理指南》
Heart Views. 2023 Apr-Jun;24(2):67-92. doi: 10.4103/heartviews.heartviews_102_22. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
6
Level of Patient Safety Culture Awareness Among Healthcare Workers.医护人员对患者安全文化的认知水平。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023 Feb 2;16:321-332. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S376623. eCollection 2023.
7
Attitudes of Family Medicine Trainees Towards Patient-Centeredness Practice.家庭医学实习生对以患者为中心实践的态度。
Int J Gen Med. 2023 Jan 26;16:329-336. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S400820. eCollection 2023.
8
Experiences and Satisfaction of Patients with Non-Communicable Diseases with Current Care in Primary Health Care Centres in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯初级卫生保健中心非传染性疾病患者对当前护理的体验与满意度
J Patient Exp. 2022 Oct 30;9:23743735221134734. doi: 10.1177/23743735221134734. eCollection 2022.
9
Attitudes and Perceptions of Health Leaders for the Quality Enhancement of Workforce in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯卫生领导者对提升劳动力素质的态度与认知
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 May 12;10(5):891. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10050891.
10
Health Policy Development During COVID-19 in Saudi Arabia: Mixed Methods Analysis.沙特阿拉伯 COVID-19 期间的卫生政策制定:混合方法分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Mar 14;9:801273. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.801273. eCollection 2021.
利雅得一家大型教学医院的患者安全文化:基线评估、比较分析及改进机会
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Mar 12;14:122. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-122.
4
Patients' satisfaction with the quality of nursing care provided: the Saudi experience.患者对所提供护理质量的满意度:沙特阿拉伯的经验。
Int J Nurs Pract. 2013 Dec;19(6):584-90. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12102. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
5
Are healthcare workers' intentions to vaccinate related to their knowledge, beliefs and attitudes? A systematic review.医护人员的疫苗接种意愿与其知识、信念和态度有关吗?一项系统综述。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Feb 19;13:154. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-154.
6
A systematic review of evidence on the links between patient experience and clinical safety and effectiveness.患者体验与临床安全性和有效性之间关联的证据的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2013 Jan 3;3(1):e001570. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001570.
7
Knowledge of the residents at King Abdul-Aziz University Hospital (KAAUH) about palliative care.阿卜杜勒-阿齐兹国王大学医院(KAAUH)住院医师对姑息治疗的了解。
J Family Community Med. 2012 Sep;19(3):194-7. doi: 10.4103/2230-8229.102321.
8
Study of the relation between quality of inpatient care and early readmission for diabetic patients at a hospital in the Eastern province of Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯东部省份某医院住院患者护理质量与早期再入院率的关系研究。
East Mediterr Health J. 2012 May;18(5):474-9. doi: 10.26719/2012.18.5.474.
9
Health care system in Saudi Arabia: an overview.沙特阿拉伯的医疗保健系统:概述。
East Mediterr Health J. 2011 Oct;17(10):784-93. doi: 10.26719/2011.17.10.784.
10
Impact of accreditation on the quality of healthcare services: a systematic review of the literature.认证对医疗服务质量的影响:文献系统评价
Ann Saudi Med. 2011 Jul-Aug;31(4):407-16. doi: 10.4103/0256-4947.83204.