Comin Marta, Barbieri Sara, Minero Michela, Dalla Costa Emanuela
Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, 26900 Lodi, Italy.
Animals (Basel). 2023 Apr 18;13(8):1395. doi: 10.3390/ani13081395.
According to EU legislation, animal-based indicators (ABMs) are used to evaluate the efficacy of stunning methods to ensure that animals do not regain consciousness. EFSA has provided a list of ABMs for electrical and mechanical stunning in sheep; however, there is still a lack of information on their feasibility. We aimed to identify and evaluate the feasibility constraints of ABMs commonly applied in slaughterhouses to assess proper stunning in sheep.
For this systematic review, we searched the Scopus and Web of Science databases from 2000 to 8 August 2022, including full peer-reviewed papers written in English on the welfare of sheep at the stunning and restraint phases. We excluded studies using a gas stunning method or without prior stunning, as well as manuscripts in which indicators were applied after sticking.
Of 1289 records identified, only 8 papers were eligible for the critical evaluation of physical aspects that affect the feasibility of ABMs. These aspects were defined as a given definition of the feasibility of ABMs, and information was summarized and critically evaluated. The results highlighted a lack of information on the feasibility of ABMs which should be considered in the various conditions of commercial slaughterhouses.
根据欧盟法规,基于动物的指标(ABMs)用于评估致昏方法的有效性,以确保动物不会恢复意识。欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)提供了一份用于绵羊电击和机械致昏的ABMs清单;然而,关于其可行性的信息仍然不足。我们旨在识别和评估屠宰场中常用的ABMs在评估绵羊适当致昏方面的可行性限制。
对于这项系统评价,我们检索了2000年至2022年8月8日的Scopus和Web of Science数据库,包括以英文撰写的关于绵羊在致昏和保定阶段福利的完全同行评审论文。我们排除了使用气体致昏方法或未事先致昏的研究,以及在放血后应用指标的手稿。
在识别出的1289条记录中,只有8篇论文符合对影响ABMs可行性的物理方面进行批判性评价的条件。这些方面被定义为ABMs可行性的特定定义,并对信息进行了总结和批判性评价。结果突出表明,在商业屠宰场的各种条件下,缺乏关于ABMs可行性的信息,这一点应予以考虑。