Suppr超能文献

为伴侣提供个人护理的心理影响:多维度视角

The Psychological Effects of Providing Personal Care to a Partner: A Multidimensional Perspective.

作者信息

Hansen Thomas, Slagsvold Britt

机构信息

NOVA - Norwegian Social Research , Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Health Psychol Res. 2013 Jul 30;1(2):e25. doi: 10.4081/hpr.2013.e25. eCollection 2013 Apr 18.

Abstract

The expected increasing demand for informal care in aging societies underscores the importance of understanding the psychological implications of caregiving. This study explores the effect of providing regular help with personal care to a partner on different aspects of psychological well-being. We use cross-sectional data from the Norwegian Life Course, Ageing and Generation study (n. ~15,000; age 40-84) and two-wave panel data from the Norwegian study on Life Course, Ageing and Generation (n. ~3000; age 40-84). To separate the effects of providing care from those of the partner's disability, caregivers are contrasted with non-caregivers with both disabled and nondisabled partners. We separate outcomes into cognitive well-being (life satisfaction), psychological functioning (self-esteem, mastery), and affective well-being (happiness, depression, loneliness). Findings show that caregiving has important cross-sectional and longitudinal detrimental psychological effects. These effects are fairly consistent across all aspects of well-being, demonstrating that caregiving has a broad-based negative impact. Among women, however, these effects are similar to if not weaker than the effects of a partner's disability. Caregiving effects are constant by age, education, and employment status, but stronger among caregivers with health problems. Providing personal care to a partner is associated with marked adverse psychological effects for men and women irrespective of age and socio-economic status. Hence, no sociodemographic group is immune from caregiving stress, so programs should be targeted generally. The results also suggest that the health needs of caregivers demand more attention.

摘要

老龄化社会对非正式护理的需求预计会不断增加,这凸显了理解护理工作心理影响的重要性。本研究探讨了定期为伴侣提供个人护理帮助对心理健康不同方面的影响。我们使用了来自挪威生命历程、老龄化与代际研究的横断面数据(约15000人;年龄40 - 84岁)以及来自挪威生命历程、老龄化与代际研究的两波面板数据(约3000人;年龄40 - 84岁)。为了区分提供护理的影响与伴侣残疾的影响,将有残疾和无残疾伴侣的护理者与非护理者进行对比。我们将结果分为认知幸福感(生活满意度)、心理功能(自尊、掌控感)和情感幸福感(幸福、抑郁、孤独感)。研究结果表明,护理工作具有重要的横断面和纵向负面心理影响。这些影响在幸福感的各个方面都相当一致,表明护理工作具有广泛的负面影响。然而,在女性中,这些影响即便不比伴侣残疾的影响弱,也与之相似。护理工作的影响在年龄、教育程度和就业状况方面是恒定的,但在有健康问题的护理者中影响更强。无论年龄和社会经济地位如何,为伴侣提供个人护理对男性和女性都有明显的负面心理影响。因此,没有哪个社会人口群体能免受护理压力的影响,所以项目应该普遍针对所有群体。研究结果还表明,护理者的健康需求需要更多关注。

相似文献

1
The Psychological Effects of Providing Personal Care to a Partner: A Multidimensional Perspective.
Health Psychol Res. 2013 Jul 30;1(2):e25. doi: 10.4081/hpr.2013.e25. eCollection 2013 Apr 18.
2
Feeling the squeeze? The effects of combining work and informal caregiving on psychological well-being.
Eur J Ageing. 2014 May 3;12(1):51-60. doi: 10.1007/s10433-014-0315-y. eCollection 2015 Mar.
5
The impact of chronic diseases: the partner's perspective.
Fam Community Health. 2007 Oct-Dec;30(4):305-17. doi: 10.1097/01.FCH.0000290543.48576.cf.
6
Are informal caregivers less happy than noncaregivers? Happiness and the intensity of caregiving in combination with paid and voluntary work.
Scand J Caring Sci. 2013 Mar;27(1):44-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2012.00998.x. Epub 2012 May 10.
7
10
Providing personal informal care to older European adults: should we care about the caregivers' health?
Prev Med. 2015 Jan;70:64-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.10.028. Epub 2014 Nov 24.

引用本文的文献

4
Living Without a Diagnosis: A Patient's Perspective on Diabetic Macular Ischemia.
Ophthalmol Ther. 2022 Oct;11(5):1617-1628. doi: 10.1007/s40123-022-00546-3. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
5
Seeing Beyond Anatomy: Quality of Life with Geographic Atrophy.
Ophthalmol Ther. 2021 Sep;10(3):367-382. doi: 10.1007/s40123-021-00352-3. Epub 2021 Jun 5.
7
Parental disability, parent care, and offspring mental health outcomes.
Eur J Ageing. 2015 Mar 11;12(3):175-185. doi: 10.1007/s10433-015-0339-y. eCollection 2015 Sep.
8
Feeling the squeeze? The effects of combining work and informal caregiving on psychological well-being.
Eur J Ageing. 2014 May 3;12(1):51-60. doi: 10.1007/s10433-014-0315-y. eCollection 2015 Mar.
9
Carer Characteristics and Health, Wellbeing and Employment Outcomes of Older Australian Baby Boomers.
J Cross Cult Gerontol. 2017 Sep;32(3):339-356. doi: 10.1007/s10823-017-9321-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Changing policies, changing patterns of care: Danish and Swedish home care at the crossroads.
Eur J Ageing. 2012 Jan 26;9(2):101-109. doi: 10.1007/s10433-011-0209-1. eCollection 2012 Jun.
2
Intergenerational solidarity and the family-welfare state balance.
Eur J Ageing. 2005 Sep 27;2(3):174-182. doi: 10.1007/s10433-005-0001-1. eCollection 2005 Sep.
3
The effect of unemployment on the mental health of spouses - evidence from plant closures in Germany.
J Health Econ. 2013 May;32(3):546-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.02.004. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
4
Care challenges for informal caregivers of chronically ill lung patients: results from a questionnaire survey.
Scand J Public Health. 2012 Feb;40(1):18-24. doi: 10.1177/1403494811425712. Epub 2011 Oct 17.
5
Impact of caregiving on Finnish family caregivers.
Scand J Caring Sci. 2012 Jun;26(2):211-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2011.00919.x. Epub 2011 Aug 21.
6
Spousal caregiving in late midlife versus older ages: implications of work and family obligations.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2008 Jul;63(4):S229-S238. doi: 10.1093/geronb/63.4.s229.
7
The association between caregiving satisfaction, difficulties and coping among older family caregivers.
J Clin Nurs. 2007 May;16(5):832-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01382.x.
8
Life satisfaction among informal caregivers in comparison with non-caregivers.
Scand J Caring Sci. 2006 Dec;20(4):427-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2006.00424.x.
9
10
The Satisfaction With Life Scale.
J Pers Assess. 1985 Feb;49(1):71-5. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验