• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

移动技术习惯:设备使用、跨期偏好、冲动控制和奖励敏感性之间的关联模式。

Mobile technology habits: patterns of association among device usage, intertemporal preference, impulse control, and reward sensitivity.

作者信息

Wilmer Henry H, Chein Jason M

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Temple University, 1701 N. 13th Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Oct;23(5):1607-1614. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1011-z.

DOI:10.3758/s13423-016-1011-z
PMID:26980462
Abstract

Mobile electronic devices are playing an increasingly pervasive role in our daily activities. Yet, there has been very little empirical research investigating how mobile technology habits might relate to individual differences in cognition and affect. The research presented in this paper provides evidence that heavier investment in mobile devices is correlated with a relatively weaker tendency to delay gratification (as measured by a delay discounting task) and a greater inclination toward impulsive behavior (i.e., weaker impulse control, assessed behaviorally and through self-report) but is not related to individual differences in sensitivity to reward. Analyses further demonstrated that individual variation in impulse control mediates the relationship between mobile technology usage and delay of gratification. Although based on correlational results, these findings lend some backing to concerns that increased use of portable electronic devices could have negative impacts on impulse control and the ability to appropriately valuate delayed rewards.

摘要

移动电子设备在我们的日常活动中发挥着越来越普遍的作用。然而,很少有实证研究调查移动技术习惯与认知和情感方面的个体差异之间可能存在怎样的关联。本文所呈现的研究提供了证据,表明在移动设备上投入更多与延迟满足的倾向相对较弱(通过延迟折扣任务衡量)以及更倾向于冲动行为(即冲动控制较弱,通过行为和自我报告评估)相关,但与对奖励的敏感度的个体差异无关。分析进一步表明,冲动控制的个体差异介导了移动技术使用与延迟满足之间的关系。尽管基于相关结果,但这些发现为以下担忧提供了一些支持,即便携式电子设备使用的增加可能对冲动控制以及正确评估延迟奖励的能力产生负面影响。

相似文献

1
Mobile technology habits: patterns of association among device usage, intertemporal preference, impulse control, and reward sensitivity.移动技术习惯:设备使用、跨期偏好、冲动控制和奖励敏感性之间的关联模式。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Oct;23(5):1607-1614. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1011-z.
2
Wired to be connected? Links between mobile technology engagement, intertemporal preference and frontostriatal white matter connectivity.是否天生爱连线?手机技术使用与时间偏好及额眶部皮质下白质连接的关系。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2019 May 17;14(4):367-379. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsz024.
3
Likes and impulsivity: Investigating the relationship between actual smartphone use and delay discounting.喜欢和冲动:研究实际智能手机使用与延迟折扣之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 18;15(11):e0241383. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241383. eCollection 2020.
4
Problematic Internet Users' Discounting Behaviors Reflect an Inability to Delay Gratification, Not Risk Taking.有问题的互联网用户的折扣行为反映了他们无法延迟满足,而不是冒险。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2016 Mar;19(3):172-8. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2015.0295. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
5
Neural mechanisms of individual differences in temporal discounting of monetary and primary rewards in adolescents.青少年对货币和初级奖励的时间折扣的个体差异的神经机制。
Neuroimage. 2017 Jun;153:198-210. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.04.013. Epub 2017 Apr 14.
6
Ventral medial prefrontal cortex inactivation impairs impulse control but does not affect delay-discounting in rats.腹内侧前额叶皮层失活可损害冲动控制,但不影响大鼠的延迟折扣。
Behav Brain Res. 2014 May 1;264:230-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.02.013. Epub 2014 Feb 17.
7
Impulse control and restrained eating among young women: Evidence for compensatory cortical activation during a chocolate-specific delayed discounting task.冲动控制和年轻女性的节制饮食:巧克力特定延迟折扣任务中补偿性皮质激活的证据。
Appetite. 2016 Oct 1;105:477-86. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.05.017. Epub 2016 May 18.
8
Measuring facets of reward sensitivity, inhibition, and impulse control in individuals with problematic Internet use.测量有问题的互联网使用者的奖励敏感性、抑制和冲动控制的各个方面。
Psychiatry Res. 2019 May;275:351-358. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.03.032. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
9
Learning to wait for more likely or just more: greater tolerance to delays of reward with increasingly longer delays.学会等待更有可能出现的结果或者仅仅是更多的东西:随着延迟时间越来越长,对奖励延迟的耐受性增强。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2015 Jan;103(1):108-24. doi: 10.1002/jeab.132.
10
Elevated outcome-anticipation and outcome-evaluation ERPs associated with a greater preference for larger-but-delayed rewards.与对更大但延迟奖励的更强偏好相关的预期结果和评估结果的事件相关电位升高。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2017 Jun;17(3):625-641. doi: 10.3758/s13415-017-0501-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Cure for tantrums? Longitudinal associations between parental digital emotion regulation and children's self-regulatory skills.应对发脾气的方法?父母数字情绪调节与儿童自我调节技能之间的纵向关联。
Front Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2024 Jun 28;3:1276154. doi: 10.3389/frcha.2024.1276154. eCollection 2024.
2
Human intelligence can safeguard against artificial intelligence: individual differences in the discernment of human from AI texts.人类智能可以防范人工智能:人类与 AI 文本识别的个体差异。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 29;14(1):25989. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-76218-y.
3
Can physical activity counteract the negative effects of sedentary behavior on the physical and mental health of children and adolescents? A narrative review.

本文引用的文献

1
Beyond Self-Report: Tools to Compare Estimated and Real-World Smartphone Use.超越自我报告:比较估计的和现实世界中智能手机使用情况的工具。
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 28;10(10):e0139004. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139004. eCollection 2015.
2
Texting while driving as impulsive choice: A behavioral economic analysis.开车时发短信作为冲动选择:一项行为经济学分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Oct;83:182-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.07.025. Epub 2015 Aug 13.
3
Media multitasking and behavioral measures of sustained attention.媒体多任务处理与持续注意力的行为测量
体育运动能否抵消久坐行为对儿童和青少年身心健康的负面影响?一项叙述性综述。
Front Public Health. 2024 Aug 2;12:1412389. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1412389. eCollection 2024.
4
Can human intelligence safeguard against artificial intelligence? Exploring individual differences in the discernment of human from AI texts.人类智能能否抵御人工智能?探索在区分人类与人工智能生成文本方面的个体差异。
Res Sq. 2024 Apr 29:rs.3.rs-4277893. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4277893/v1.
5
Exploring the impact of smartphone addiction on decision-making behavior in college students: an fNIRS study based on the Iowa Gambling Task.探究智能手机成瘾对大学生决策行为的影响:一项基于爱荷华赌博任务的功能近红外光谱研究
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Apr 22;15:1342521. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1342521. eCollection 2024.
6
Do Smartphone Addiction and Self-Regulation Failures Affect Students' Academic Life Satisfaction? The Role of Students' Mind Wandering and Cognitive Failures.智能手机成瘾和自我调节失败会影响学生的学业生活满意度吗?学生走神和认知失误的作用。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2024 Mar 18;17:1231-1253. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S437076. eCollection 2024.
7
Role of leisure sedentary behavior on type 2 diabetes and glycemic homeostasis: a Mendelian randomization analysis.休闲性久坐行为对 2 型糖尿病及血糖稳态的作用:一项孟德尔随机化分析。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Nov 23;14:1221228. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1221228. eCollection 2023.
8
Exploring the Impact of Smartphone Addiction on Risk Decision-Making Behavior among College Students Based on fNIRS Technology.基于功能近红外光谱技术探究智能手机成瘾对大学生风险决策行为的影响
Brain Sci. 2023 Sep 15;13(9):1330. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13091330.
9
Investigating psychological and motivational predictors of problematic smartphone use among Smartphone-based Social Networking Service (SNS) users.探究基于智能手机的社交网络服务(SNS)用户中问题性智能手机使用的心理和动机预测因素。
Addict Behav Rep. 2023 Jun 21;18:100506. doi: 10.1016/j.abrep.2023.100506. eCollection 2023 Dec.
10
A Systematic Review of Structural and Functional MRI Studies Investigating Social Networking Site Use.一项关于调查社交网站使用情况的结构和功能磁共振成像研究的系统综述
Brain Sci. 2023 May 11;13(5):787. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13050787.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 Feb;77(2):390-401. doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0771-7.
4
Effects of anonymous peer observation on adolescents' preference for immediate rewards.匿名同伴观察对青少年即时奖励偏好的影响。
Dev Sci. 2014 Jan;17(1):71-8. doi: 10.1111/desc.12099. Epub 2013 Nov 6.
5
Working memory, fluid intelligence, and impulsiveness in heavy media multitaskers.重度媒体多任务处理者的工作记忆、流体智力和冲动性。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Dec;20(6):1274-81. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0456-6.
6
Impulsivity-like traits and risky driving behaviors among college students.大学生冲动特质与冒险驾驶行为。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Apr;53:142-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.01.009. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
7
Who multi-tasks and why? Multi-tasking ability, perceived multi-tasking ability, impulsivity, and sensation seeking.谁会多任务处理,以及为什么?多任务处理能力、感知的多任务处理能力、冲动性和寻求刺激。
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54402. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054402. Epub 2013 Jan 23.
8
Towards a general model of temporal discounting.走向一般的时间折扣模型。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2013 Jan;99(1):58-73. doi: 10.1002/jeab.6. Epub 2012 Dec 5.
9
The neural mechanisms of inter-temporal decision-making: understanding variability.跨期决策的神经机制:理解可变性。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 May;15(5):227-39. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.03.002. Epub 2011 Apr 15.
10
The choice to text and drive in younger drivers: behavior may shape attitude.年轻人边开车边发短信的选择:行为可能会影响态度。
Accid Anal Prev. 2011 Jan;43(1):134-42. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.08.003. Epub 2010 Sep 1.