Aggarwal Neil Krishan, Cedeño Kryst, Guarnaccia Peter, Kleinman Arthur, Lewis-Fernández Roberto
Columbia University, 1051 Riverside Drive, Unit 11, New York, NY 10032 USA ; New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY USA.
New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY USA.
Springerplus. 2016 Mar 31;5:384. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2037-4. eCollection 2016.
Cultural competence training is mandatory in the United States of America to alleviate minority health disparities though few studies have examined perceptions across stakeholders. We conducted separate focus groups with patients, clinicians, and administrators from the psychiatry department at one community hospital and compared responses to hospital policies. Stakeholders defined cultural competence through group-based or person-centered traits despite policies recommended person-centered approaches. Administrators and clinicians named clinician techniques for psycho-education whereas patients named these techniques for enlistment in treatment planning as equals. All groups named patient cultural views and institutional challenges as barriers to care, but only patients and administrators additionally named clinician biases as possible barriers. We discuss these discrepant perceptions and possible solutions to improve research, practice, and policy on cultural competence in mental health.
在美国,文化能力培训是强制性的,目的是减少少数群体的健康差距,不过很少有研究考察各利益相关者的看法。我们在一家社区医院与精神病科的患者、临床医生和管理人员分别进行了焦点小组讨论,并比较了他们对医院政策的反应。尽管政策推荐以患者为中心的方法,但利益相关者通过基于群体或以人为本的特征来定义文化能力。管理人员和临床医生提到了用于心理教育的临床医生技巧,而患者则将这些技巧视为平等参与治疗计划制定的方式。所有群体都将患者的文化观点和机构挑战视为护理的障碍,但只有患者和管理人员还提到临床医生的偏见可能是障碍。我们讨论了这些不同的看法以及改善心理健康领域文化能力研究、实践和政策的可能解决方案。