Shepherd Stephane M, Willis-Esqueda Cynthia, Newton Danielle, Sivasubramaniam Diane, Paradies Yin
Centre for Forensic Behavioural Science, Swinburne University of Technology, 1/582 Heidelberg Rd, Alphington, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Burnett Hall, Lincoln, NE, USA.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Feb 26;19(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-3959-7.
Cross-cultural educational initiatives for professionals are now commonplace across a variety of sectors including health care. A growing number of studies have attempted to explore the utility of such initiatives on workplace behaviors and client outcomes. Yet few studies have explored how professionals perceive cross-cultural educational models (e.g., cultural awareness, cultural competence) and the extent to which they (and their organizations) execute the principles in practice. In response, this study aimed to explore the general perspectives of health care professionals on culturally competent care, their experiences working with multi-cultural patients, their own levels of cultural competence and the extent to which they believe their workplaces address cross-cultural challenges.
The perspectives and experiences of a sample of 56 health care professionals across several health care systems from a Mid-Western state in the United States were sourced via a 19-item questionnaire. The questionnaire comprised both open-ended questions and multiple choice items. Percentages across participant responses were calculated for multiple choice items. A thematic analysis of open-ended responses was undertaken to identify dominant themes.
Participants largely expressed confidence in their ability to meet the needs of multi-cultural clientele despite almost half the sample not having undergone formal cross-cultural training. The majority of the sample appeared to view cross-cultural education from a 'cultural awareness' perspective - effective cross-cultural care was often defined in terms of possessing useful cultural knowledge (e.g., norms and customs) and facilitating communication (the use of interpreters); in other words, from an immediate practical standpoint. The principles of systemic cross-cultural approaches (e.g., cultural competence, cultural safety) such as a recognition of racism, power imbalances, entrenched majority culture biases and the need for self-reflexivity (awareness of one's own prejudices) were scarcely acknowledged by study participants.
Findings indicate a need for interventions that acknowledge the value of cultural awareness-based approaches, while also exploring the utility of more comprehensive cultural competence and safety approaches.
针对专业人员的跨文化教育举措如今在包括医疗保健在内的各个领域都很常见。越来越多的研究试图探讨此类举措对工作场所行为和客户结果的效用。然而,很少有研究探讨专业人员如何看待跨文化教育模式(如文化意识、文化能力)以及他们(及其组织)在实践中执行这些原则的程度。作为回应,本研究旨在探讨医疗保健专业人员对文化胜任力护理的总体看法、他们与多元文化患者合作的经历、他们自身的文化胜任力水平以及他们认为工作场所应对跨文化挑战的程度。
通过一份包含19个项目的问卷,收集了来自美国中西部一个州多个医疗保健系统的56名医疗保健专业人员的观点和经历。该问卷包括开放式问题和多项选择题。对多项选择题的参与者回答进行百分比计算。对开放式回答进行主题分析以确定主要主题。
尽管近一半的样本没有接受过正式的跨文化培训,但参与者大多对自己满足多元文化客户需求的能力表示有信心。大多数样本似乎从“文化意识”的角度看待跨文化教育——有效的跨文化护理通常被定义为拥有有用的文化知识(如规范和习俗)并促进沟通(使用口译员);换句话说,从直接的实际角度来看。系统性跨文化方法的原则(如文化胜任力、文化安全),如对种族主义、权力不平衡、根深蒂固的多数文化偏见以及自我反思(意识到自己的偏见)的必要性的认识,几乎没有得到研究参与者的认可。
研究结果表明需要进行干预,既要承认基于文化意识方法的价值,同时也要探索更全面的文化胜任力和安全方法的效用。