Green Adam E, Spiegel Katherine A, Giangrande Evan J, Weinberger Adam B, Gallagher Natalie M, Turkeltaub Peter E
Department of Psychology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
School of Medicine, University of Connecticut, Connecticut, USA.
Cereb Cortex. 2017 Apr 1;27(4):2628-2639. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhw080.
Recent neuroimaging evidence indicates neural mechanisms that support transient improvements in creative performance (augmented state creativity) in response to cognitive interventions (creativity cueing). Separately, neural interventions via tDCS show encouraging potential for modulating neuronal function during creative performance. If cognitive and neural interventions are separately effective, can they be combined? Does state creativity augmentation represent "real" creativity, or do interventions simply yield divergence by diminishing meaningfulness/appropriateness? Can augmenting state creativity bolster creative reasoning that supports innovation, particularly analogical reasoning? To address these questions, we combined tDCS with creativity cueing. Testing a regionally specific hypothesis from neuroimaging, high-definition tDCS-targeted frontopolar cortex activity recently shown to predict state creativity augmentation. In a novel analogy finding task, participants under tDCS formulated substantially more creative analogical connections in a large matrix search space (creativity indexed via latent semantic analysis). Critically, increased analogical creativity was not due to diminished accuracy in discerning valid analogies, indicating "real" creativity rather than inappropriate divergence. A simpler relational creativity paradigm (modified verb generation) revealed a tDCS-by-cue interaction; tDCS further enhanced creativity cue-related increases in semantic distance. Findings point to the potential of noninvasive neuromodulation to enhance creative relational cognition, including augmentation of the deliberate effort to formulate connections between distant concepts.
最近的神经影像学证据表明,存在一些神经机制,它们能支持在认知干预(创造力提示)下创造性表现的短暂提升(增强状态创造力)。另外,经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)这种神经干预方式在创造性表现过程中调节神经元功能方面显示出令人鼓舞的潜力。如果认知干预和神经干预各自有效,那么它们能结合起来吗?状态创造力的增强代表“真正的”创造力吗?还是说干预仅仅通过降低意义/适当性而产生差异?增强状态创造力能否促进支持创新的创造性推理,尤其是类比推理?为了解决这些问题,我们将tDCS与创造力提示相结合。基于神经影像学提出一个区域特异性假设进行测试,高清晰度tDCS靶向额极皮层活动最近已被证明可预测状态创造力的增强。在一项新颖的类比发现任务中,接受tDCS的参与者在一个大矩阵搜索空间中形成了显著更多的创造性类比联系(创造力通过潜在语义分析来衡量)。关键的是,类比创造力的提高并非由于辨别有效类比的准确性降低,这表明是“真正的”创造力而非不适当的差异。一个更简单的关系创造力范式(修改后的动词生成)揭示了tDCS与提示的相互作用;tDCS进一步增强了与创造力提示相关的语义距离增加。研究结果表明,非侵入性神经调节有潜力增强创造性关系认知,包括增强在遥远概念之间建立联系的刻意努力。