• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

作为社会创新推动者的技术反思型个体。

Technologically Reflective Individuals as Enablers of Social Innovation.

作者信息

Schweitzer Fiona, Rau Christiane, Gassmann Oliver, van den Hende Ellis

出版信息

J Prod Innov Manage. 2015 Nov;32(6):847-860. doi: 10.1111/jpim.12269. Epub 2015 May 20.

DOI:10.1111/jpim.12269
PMID:27134342
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4841176/
Abstract

This paper identifies technologically reflective individuals and demonstrates their ability to develop innovations that benefit society. Technological reflectiveness (TR) is the tendency to think about the societal impact of an innovation, and those who display this capability in public are individuals who participate in online idea competitions focused on technical solutions for social problems (such as General Electric's eco-challenge, the James Dyson Award, and the BOSCH Technology Horizon Award). However, technologically reflective individuals also reflect in private settings (e.g., when reading news updates), thus requiring a scale to identify them. This paper describes the systematic development of an easy-to-administer multi-item scale to measure an individual's level of TR. Applying the TR scale in an empirical study on a health monitoring system confirmed that individuals' degree of TR relates positively to their ability to generate (1) more new product features and uses, (2) features with higher levels of societal impact, and (3) features that are more elaborated. This scale allows firms seeking to implement co-creation in their new product development (NPD) process and sustainable solutions to identify such individuals. Thus, this paper indicates that companies wishing to introduce new technological products with a positive societal impact may profit from involving technologically reflective individuals in the NPD process.

摘要

本文识别了具有技术反思能力的个体,并展示了他们开发造福社会的创新成果的能力。技术反思(TR)是思考一项创新对社会影响的倾向,而那些在公开场合展现出这种能力的人,是参与专注于社会问题技术解决方案的在线创意竞赛的个体(如通用电气的生态挑战奖、詹姆斯·戴森奖和博世技术地平线奖)。然而,具有技术反思能力的个体也会在私下场合进行反思(例如阅读新闻更新时),因此需要一个量表来识别他们。本文描述了一个易于管理的多项目量表的系统开发过程,以衡量个体的技术反思水平。在一项关于健康监测系统的实证研究中应用该技术反思量表证实,个体的技术反思程度与他们产生以下内容的能力呈正相关:(1)更多新产品特性和用途;(2)具有更高社会影响水平的特性;(3)更详尽的特性。该量表使寻求在新产品开发(NPD)过程中实施共同创造及可持续解决方案的公司能够识别此类个体。因此,本文表明,希望推出具有积极社会影响的新技术产品的公司,可能会从让具有技术反思能力的个体参与新产品开发过程中受益。

相似文献

1
Technologically Reflective Individuals as Enablers of Social Innovation.作为社会创新推动者的技术反思型个体。
J Prod Innov Manage. 2015 Nov;32(6):847-860. doi: 10.1111/jpim.12269. Epub 2015 May 20.
2
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
3
Cooperation as the Secret Ingredient in the Recipe to Foster Internal Technological Eco-Innovation in the Agri-Food Industry.合作是农业食品行业内部技术生态创新的秘方。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 10;17(7):2588. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072588.
4
Big tech and societal sustainability: an ethical framework.大型科技与社会可持续性:一个伦理框架。
AI Soc. 2020;35(4):829-840. doi: 10.1007/s00146-020-00956-6. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
5
A Framework to Move Forward on the Path to Eco-innovation in the Construction Industry: Implications to Improve Firms' Sustainable Orientation.建筑业生态创新道路上前进的框架:对提升企业可持续导向的启示
Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Dec;21(6):1469-84. doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9620-2. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
6
A Technology-Based Classification of Firms: Can We Learn Something Looking Beyond Industry Classifications?基于技术的企业分类:超越行业分类我们能学到什么?
Entropy (Basel). 2018 Nov 18;20(11):887. doi: 10.3390/e20110887.
7
User roles and contributions during the new product development process in collaborative innovation communities.合作创新社区中新产品开发过程中的用户角色与贡献。
Appl Ergon. 2017 Sep;63:106-114. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.04.013. Epub 2017 Apr 22.
8
H2020 EU Research & Innovation Program Boost the Transfer of Technological Breakthroughs, Enable New Solutions for Personalised Health and Impact the Industry and Healthcare Systems.“地平线2020”欧盟研究与创新计划推动技术突破的转化,为个性化医疗带来新解决方案,并对行业和医疗体系产生影响。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;211:3-17.
9
Co-creation as an innovative setting to improve the uptake of scientific knowledge: overcoming obstacles, understanding considerations and applying enablers to improve scientific impact in society.共同创造作为一种创新模式,用于提高科学知识的应用:克服障碍、理解注意事项并应用促进因素以提升科学在社会中的影响力。
J Innov Entrep. 2021;10(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s13731-021-00176-2. Epub 2021 Sep 26.
10
The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility and Public Attention on Innovation Performance: Evidence from High-polluting Industries.企业社会责任和公众关注对创新绩效的影响:来自高污染行业的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Oct 16;16(20):3939. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16203939.

引用本文的文献

1
Perception of hypotheticality in technology-based business ideas: effects on Opportunity Beliefs from a Construal Level Theory perspective.基于技术的商业想法中的假设性认知:从解释水平理论视角看对机会信念的影响。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jun 7;15:1404726. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1404726. eCollection 2024.
2
Environmental corporate social responsibility practices and firm innovation: Complementarities and empirical evidence from Spanish firms.环境企业社会责任实践与企业创新:来自西班牙企业的互补性及实证证据
Heliyon. 2024 Apr 8;10(8):e28800. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28800. eCollection 2024 Apr 30.
3
A managers' work engagement framework for the digital tasks.一个针对数字任务的管理者工作投入框架。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 24;14:1009459. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1009459. eCollection 2023.
4
Empathy in occupational therapy students: a cross-sectional study at a Spanish university.职业治疗专业学生的同理心:西班牙某大学的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 26;12(4):e058821. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058821.
5
Empathy and the Development of Affective Skills.同理心与情感技能的发展。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2018 Dec;82(10):7192. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7192.

本文引用的文献

1
Insight, rumination, and self-reflection as predictors of well-being.洞察力、沉思和自我反省是幸福感的预测指标。
J Psychol. 2011 Jan-Feb;145(1):39-57. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2010.528072.
2
When asking "why" does not hurt. Distinguishing rumination from reflective processing of negative emotions.当追问“为什么”并无坏处时。区分对负面情绪的反复思考与反思性处理。
Psychol Sci. 2005 Sep;16(9):709-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01600.x.
3
The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being.活在当下的益处:正念及其在心理健康中的作用。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Apr;84(4):822-48. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822.
4
Why ruminators are poor problem solvers: clues from the phenomenology of dysphoric rumination.为什么反复思考者是糟糕的问题解决者:烦躁性反复思考现象学的线索。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999 Nov;77(5):1041-60. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.77.5.1041.
5
Private self-consciousness and the five-factor model of personality: distinguishing rumination from reflection.私密自我意识与人格五因素模型:区分沉思与反思。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999 Feb;76(2):284-304. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.76.2.284.
6
Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): a reevaluation of the Life Orientation Test.区分乐观主义与神经质(以及特质焦虑、自我掌控和自尊):对生活取向测试的重新评估。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994 Dec;67(6):1063-78. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.67.6.1063.
7
Long-term working memory.长期工作记忆
Psychol Rev. 1995 Apr;102(2):211-45. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.102.2.211.