Hedegaard Chris J, Heegaard Peter M H
National Veterinary Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Section for Immunology and Vaccinology, The innate immunology Group, Denmark.
National Veterinary Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Section for Immunology and Vaccinology, The innate immunology Group, Denmark.
Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2016 Jun;174:50-63. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2016.04.007. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
Immunisation by administration of antibodies (immunoglobulins) has been known for more than one hundred years as a very efficient means of obtaining immediate, short-lived protection against infection and/or against the disease-causing effects of toxins from microbial pathogens and from other sources. Thus, due to its rapid action, passive immunisation is often used to treat disease caused by infection and/or toxin exposure. However immunoglobulins may also be administered prior to exposure to infection and/or toxin, although they will not provide long-lasting protection as is seen with active immunisation (vaccination) in which an immunological memory is established by controlled exposure of the host to the pathogen in question. With multi-factorial infectious diseases in production animals, especially those that have proven hard to control by vaccination, the potential of passive immunisation remains big. This review highlights a number of examples on the use of passive immunisation for the control of infectious disease in the modern production of a range of animals, including pigs, cattle, sheep, goat, poultry and fish. Special emphasis is given on the enablement of passive immunisation strategies in these production systems through low cost and ease of use as well as on the sources, composition and purity of immunoglobulin preparations used and their benefits as compared to current measures, including vaccination (also comprising maternal vaccination), antibiotics and feed additives such as spray-dried plasma. It is concluded that provided highly efficient, relatively low-price immunoglobulin products are available, passive immunisation has a clear role in the modern animal production sector as a means of controlling infectious diseases, importantly with a very low risk of causing development of bacterial resistance, thus constituting a real and widely applicable alternative to antibiotics.
通过给予抗体(免疫球蛋白)进行免疫已有一百多年的历史,这是一种非常有效的方法,可立即获得针对感染和/或微生物病原体及其他来源毒素致病作用的短期保护。因此,由于其作用迅速,被动免疫常被用于治疗由感染和/或毒素暴露引起的疾病。然而,免疫球蛋白也可在接触感染和/或毒素之前给予,尽管它们不会像主动免疫(接种疫苗)那样提供持久的保护,主动免疫是通过让宿主有控制地接触相关病原体来建立免疫记忆。对于生产动物中的多因素传染病,尤其是那些已证明难以通过疫苗控制的疾病,被动免疫的潜力仍然很大。本综述重点介绍了一系列动物(包括猪、牛、羊、山羊、家禽和鱼类)现代生产中使用被动免疫控制传染病的一些实例。特别强调了通过低成本和易用性在这些生产系统中实现被动免疫策略,以及所用免疫球蛋白制剂的来源、组成和纯度,以及与当前措施(包括疫苗接种(也包括母源疫苗接种)、抗生素和饲料添加剂如喷雾干燥血浆)相比它们的益处。得出的结论是,如果有高效、相对低价的免疫球蛋白产品,被动免疫在现代动物生产领域作为控制传染病的一种手段具有明确作用,重要的是其产生细菌耐药性的风险非常低,因此构成了一种切实可行且广泛适用的抗生素替代品。