• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Editorial: From Is to Ought: The Place of Normative Models in the Study of Human Thought.社论:从“是”到“应当”:规范模型在人类思维研究中的地位。
Front Psychol. 2016 Apr 28;7:628. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00628. eCollection 2016.
2
The intersection between Descriptivism and Meliorism in reasoning research: further proposals in support of 'soft normativism'.推理研究中描述主义与改良主义的交叉:支持“软规范主义”的进一步提议
Front Psychol. 2014 Nov 5;5:1269. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01269. eCollection 2014.
3
Subtracting "ought" from "is": descriptivism versus normativism in the study of human thinking.从“是”中减去“应该”:人类思维研究中的描述主义与规范主义。
Behav Brain Sci. 2011 Oct;34(5):233-48; discussion 249-90. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X1100001X.
4
Cognitive Success: A Consequentialist Account of Rationality in Cognition.认知成功:认知合理性的后果主义解释
Top Cogn Sci. 2019 Jan;11(1):7-36. doi: 10.1111/tops.12410. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
5
Inferential Integrity and Attention.推理完整性与注意力。
Front Psychol. 2019 Nov 26;10:2580. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02580. eCollection 2019.
6
The Is-Ought Problem in Practical Ethics.实践伦理学中的“是—应当”问题。
HEC Forum. 2017 Dec;29(4):277-292. doi: 10.1007/s10730-016-9318-8.
7
From is to ought, and back: how normative concerns foster progress in reasoning research.从“是”到“应当”,再回归:规范性考量如何推动推理研究的进展。
Front Psychol. 2014 Mar 13;5:219. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00219. eCollection 2014.
8
Navigating Between Stealth Advocacy and Unconscious Dogmatism: The Challenge of Researching the Norms, Politics and Power of Global Health.在隐性倡导和无意识教条主义之间斡旋:研究全球卫生规范、政治和权力的挑战。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2015 Jun 16;4(10):641-4. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2015.116.
9
Utilitarian Moral Judgment Exclusively Coheres with Inference from Is to Ought.功利主义道德判断完全与从“是”到“应当”的推理相一致。
Front Psychol. 2017 Jun 22;8:1042. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01042. eCollection 2017.
10
Perspectivism and the Argument from Guidance.视角主义与引导论证。
Ethical Theory Moral Pract. 2017;20(2):361-374. doi: 10.1007/s10677-016-9775-9. Epub 2016 Dec 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Associations with Lenticulostriatal Vasculopathy (LSV) at Birth: A Case-Control Study.出生时豆状核纹状体血管病(LSV)的临床关联:一项病例对照研究。
Children (Basel). 2025 Feb 12;12(2):223. doi: 10.3390/children12020223.
2
Conditional rehabilitation of cooperation under strategic uncertainty.战略不确定性下合作的条件性恢复
J Math Biol. 2019 Oct;79(5):1973-2003. doi: 10.1007/s00285-019-01417-5. Epub 2019 Aug 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Deontic introduction: A theory of inference from is to ought.道义引入:一种从“是”到“应当”的推理理论。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 Sep;41(5):1516-32. doi: 10.1037/a0038686. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
2
Bayesian just-so stories in psychology and neuroscience.心理学和神经科学中的贝叶斯牵强附会故事。
Psychol Bull. 2012 May;138(3):389-414. doi: 10.1037/a0026450.
3
Subtracting "ought" from "is": descriptivism versus normativism in the study of human thinking.从“是”中减去“应该”:人类思维研究中的描述主义与规范主义。
Behav Brain Sci. 2011 Oct;34(5):233-48; discussion 249-90. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X1100001X.
4
Bayesian Fundamentalism or Enlightenment? On the explanatory status and theoretical contributions of Bayesian models of cognition.贝叶斯原教旨主义还是启蒙?论认知贝叶斯模型的解释地位和理论贡献。
Behav Brain Sci. 2011 Aug;34(4):169-88; disuccsion 188-231. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X10003134.
5
Précis of bayesian rationality: The probabilistic approach to human reasoning.《贝叶斯理性:人类推理的概率方法》概要
Behav Brain Sci. 2009 Feb;32(1):69-84; discussion 85-120. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X09000284.
6
Moral heuristics.道德启发式
Behav Brain Sci. 2005 Aug;28(4):531-42; discussion 542-73. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X05000099.
7
Individual differences in reasoning: implications for the rationality debate?推理中的个体差异:对理性辩论的影响?
Behav Brain Sci. 2000 Oct;23(5):645-65; discussion 665-726. doi: 10.1017/s0140525x00003435.
8
Beyond intuition and instinct blindness: toward an evolutionarily rigorous cognitive science.超越直觉与本能盲区:迈向一门进化严谨的认知科学。
Cognition. 1994 Apr-Jun;50(1-3):41-77. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90020-5.

Editorial: From Is to Ought: The Place of Normative Models in the Study of Human Thought.

作者信息

Elqayam Shira, Over David E

机构信息

School of Applied Social Sciences, De Montfort University Leicester, UK.

Department of Psychology, Durham University Durham, UK.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2016 Apr 28;7:628. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00628. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00628
PMID:27199856
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4848393/
Abstract
摘要