Iannello Paola, Perucca Valeria, Riva Silvia, Antonietti Alessandro, Pravettoni Gabriella
Department of Psychology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Milan, Italy.
Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Interdisciplinary Centre for Research and Intervention on Decision (IRIDe Centre), Milan, Italy.
Eur J Psychol. 2015 Nov 27;11(4):691-706. doi: 10.5964/ejop.v11i4.979. eCollection 2015 Nov.
Metacognition relative to medical decision making has been poorly investigated to date. However, beliefs about methods of decision making (metacognition) play a fundamental role in determining the efficiency of the decision itself. In the present study, we investigated a set of beliefs that physicians develop in relation to the modes of making decisions in a professional environment. The Solomon Questionnaire, designed to assess metacognitive knowledge about behaviors and mental processes involved in decision making, was administered to a sample of 18 emergency physicians, 18 surgeons, and 18 internists. Significant differences in metacognitive knowledge emerged among these three medical areas. Physicians' self-reports about the decision process mirrored the peculiarities of the context in which they operate. Their metacognitive knowledge demonstrated a reflective attitude that is an effective tool during the decision making process.
迄今为止,相对于医学决策的元认知研究甚少。然而,关于决策方法的信念(元认知)在决定决策本身的效率方面起着根本性作用。在本研究中,我们调查了医生在专业环境中形成的一系列与决策模式相关的信念。所罗门问卷旨在评估对决策中涉及的行为和心理过程的元认知知识,我们对18名急诊科医生、18名外科医生和18名内科医生进行了问卷调查。这三个医学领域在元认知知识方面出现了显著差异。医生对决策过程的自我报告反映了他们工作环境的特殊性。他们的元认知知识表现出一种反思态度,这在决策过程中是一种有效的工具。