• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从性别视角看关于癌症护理的人际投诉。

Interpersonal complaints regarding cancer care through a gender lens.

作者信息

Olsson Erik Masao

机构信息

Department of Technology Management and Economics, Centre for Healthcare Improvement and Division of Quality Sciences, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden and Centre for Equity in Healthcare, Gothenburg, Sweden.

出版信息

Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2016 Jul 11;29(6):687-702. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-03-2014-0032.

DOI:10.1108/IJHCQA-03-2014-0032
PMID:27298065
Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to investigate healthcare customer complaints concerning interpersonal matters in cancer care. Design/methodology/approach - Complaints from cancer patients and their relatives (n=116) that dealt with interpersonal matters registered between 2009 and 2011 at four local Patients' Advisory Committees in Western Sweden were sampled and analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Findings - Complaints concerned lack of information and consideration from healthcare providers. Lack of empathy and civility also caused dissatisfaction, the latter particularly for women. Relatives complained that they did not feel included in the care process or were not offered proper support. Most complaints by relatives were filed by a female relative and concerned a male patient. Research limitations/implications - Information about patient demographics other than gender could not be investigated due to database limitations. Hence, factors such as age, country of birth, and geographical residence were not included for analysis. In addition, neither the type nor stage of cancer among the sampled patients was able to be addressed. Practical implications - Patient complaints should not only be viewed as a post-consumption judgment, but also as a service interaction activity. This may require healthcare providers to enhance their interpersonal skills, allowing patients and relatives to provide feedback during service interaction to satisfactorily address dissatisfaction. Visualizing gender disparities may help healthcare providers prevent stereotypical encounters. In addition, the provider should be invited to participate in the customer's value creating network, which may also include knowledge and skills from other sources, such as relatives. Originality/value - Value co-creation offers a different view on patient complaints. Incorporating social construction into value co-creation may reveal socially constructed disparities. The paper provides aggregated information on cancer patients' and relatives' complaints concerning interpersonal issues, which can increase knowledge about patient healthcare service perceptions.

摘要

目的——本文旨在调查癌症护理中有关人际问题的医疗保健客户投诉。

设计/方法/途径——对2009年至2011年期间瑞典西部四个地方患者咨询委员会登记的涉及人际问题的癌症患者及其亲属(n = 116)的投诉进行抽样,并采用定性内容分析法进行分析。

研究结果——投诉涉及医疗保健提供者缺乏信息提供和关怀。缺乏同理心和礼貌也会导致不满,后者对女性影响尤为明显。亲属抱怨他们在护理过程中没有被纳入,或者没有得到适当的支持。亲属的大多数投诉由女性亲属提出,且涉及男性患者。

研究局限/启示——由于数据库限制,无法调查除性别以外的患者人口统计学信息。因此,年龄、出生地和居住地区等因素未纳入分析。此外,抽样患者的癌症类型和阶段均无法涉及。

实际意义——患者投诉不应仅被视为消费后的评判,还应被视为一种服务互动活动。这可能要求医疗保健提供者提高他们的人际沟通技巧,允许患者和亲属在服务互动过程中提供反馈,以令人满意地解决不满。直观呈现性别差异可能有助于医疗保健提供者避免刻板印象的接触。此外,应邀请提供者参与客户的价值创造网络,这也可能包括来自其他来源(如亲属)的知识和技能。

原创性/价值——价值共创为患者投诉提供了不同的视角。将社会建构纳入价值共创可能揭示社会建构的差异。本文提供了关于癌症患者及其亲属有关人际问题投诉的汇总信息,这可以增加对患者医疗保健服务认知的了解。

相似文献

1
Interpersonal complaints regarding cancer care through a gender lens.从性别视角看关于癌症护理的人际投诉。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2016 Jul 11;29(6):687-702. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-03-2014-0032.
2
Patients' and relatives' complaints about encounters and communication in health care: evidence for quality improvement.患者及其亲属对医疗服务中诊疗过程与沟通的投诉:质量改进的证据
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 May;75(2):199-204. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.10.007. Epub 2008 Nov 26.
3
Exploring complaints by female and male patients at Swedish hospitals using a probabilistic graphical model.使用概率图形模型探究瑞典医院中女性和男性患者的投诉情况。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2018 Sep;32(3):1148-1156. doi: 10.1111/scs.12560. Epub 2018 Feb 20.
4
The nature of patient complaints: a resource for healthcare improvements.患者投诉的本质:医疗保健改进的资源。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2019 Aug 1;31(7):556-562. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzy215.
5
Improving healthcare practice behaviors: an exploratory study identifying effective and ineffective behaviors in healthcare.改善医疗实践行为:一项探索性研究,旨在识别医疗保健中的有效和无效行为。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2016;29(2):141-61. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-07-2015-0089.
6
Important quality aspects in the transfer process.转移过程中的重要质量方面。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2014;27(2):123-39. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-09-2012-0090.
7
Service quality, patient satisfaction and loyalty in the Bangladesh healthcare sector.孟加拉国医疗保健部门的服务质量、患者满意度和忠诚度。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2017 Jun 12;30(5):477-488. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-01-2017-0004.
8
Exploring the nonlinear impact of critical incidents on users' satisfaction with healthcare services.探究关键事件对用户医疗服务满意度的非线性影响。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2019 Apr 15;32(3):621-634. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-04-2018-0089.
9
Service quality in public health clinics: perceptions of users and health professionals.公共卫生诊所的服务质量:用户和卫生专业人员的看法
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2017 Oct 9;30(8):680-692. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-09-2016-0140.
10
Healthcare service quality perception in Japan.日本的医疗服务质量认知
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2011;24(6):417-29. doi: 10.1108/09526861111150680.

引用本文的文献

1
Unveiling the Negative Customer Experience in Diagnostic Centers: A Data Mining Approach.揭示诊断中心的负面客户体验:一种数据挖掘方法。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 Apr 8;17:1491-1504. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S456109. eCollection 2024.
2
User involvement and value co-creation in well-being ecosystems.用户参与和价值共创在幸福感生态系统中的作用。
J Health Organ Manag. 2023 Sep 26;37(9):34-55. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-11-2022-0339.
3
Value Cocreation in Health Care: Systematic Review.医疗保健中的价值共创:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Mar 25;24(3):e33061. doi: 10.2196/33061.
4
Exploring power shifts as an enabler for a strengthened patient role in quality improvements: a Swedish survey study.探索权力转移如何成为增强患者在质量改进中的角色的推动者:一项瑞典调查研究。
BMJ Open Qual. 2021 Feb;10(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001185.
5
Learning from complaints in healthcare: a realist review of academic literature, policy evidence and front-line insights.从医疗保健投诉中学习:对学术文献、政策证据和一线观点的现实主义综述。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Aug;29(8):684-695. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009704. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
6
Differences in primary health care use among sub-Saharan African immigrants in Norway: a register-based study.挪威撒哈拉以南非洲移民在初级卫生保健利用方面的差异:一项基于登记册的研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jul 28;17(1):509. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2404-z.